Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a form of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) that can develop as complication of portal hypertension. Treatment of PoPH includes PAH-specific therapies and in certain cases, such therapies are necessary to facilitate a successful liver transplantation. A significant number of barriers may limit the adequate treatment of patients with PoPH and explain the poorer survival of these patients when compared to other types of PAH. Until recently, only one randomized controlled trial has included PoPH patients and the majority of treatment data is derived from relatively small observational studies. In the present manuscript we review some of the barriers in the treatment of patients with PoPH and implications for liver transplantation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Serum chloride at 6 months from the PAH diagnosis is a strong and independent predictor of mortality in patients with idiopathic or heritable PAH, even after adjusting serum sodium, renal function, diuretic, and prostacyclin analog usage.
BackgroundThe prevalence and prognostic implications of hypoxemia either at rest or during six-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with idiopathic or heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH or HPAH) have not been systemically studied.ObjectivesWe sought to determine the prevalence, phenotypic and prognostic implications of hypoxemia in patients with IPAH and HPAH.MethodsPatients with IPAH or HPAH were identified from the Cleveland Clinic Pulmonary Hypertension Registry. Pulse oximetry (SpO2) at rest and during 6MWT was used to define hypoxemia at rest or during activities when measurements were lower than 90%, respectively.ResultsA total of 292 patients (age 50.6 ± 18.0 years, 73% females) with IPAH (88%) and HPAH (12%) were included. Of them, 143 (49%) had SpO2 >90% at rest and during 6MWT, 89 (31%) subjects had hypoxemia during 6MWT and 60 (20%) had hypoxemia at rest. Patients with hypoxemia had older age, greater body mass index, higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, worse functional capacity and pulmonary function tests but less severe pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension. Individuals with hypoxemia either at rest or during the initial 6MWT had worse long-term survival when compared to subjects without hypoxemia, even when adjusting for a great number of potential confounders. (HR: 2.5 (95% CI: 1.54–3.98))ConclusionsHypoxemia in patients with IPAH and HPAH is associated with more comorbidities, less severe pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension and worse survival.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is progressive disorder characterized by elevated pulmonary vascular resistance that can lead to right heart failure and death. One of the main therapeutic options for PAH are medications targeting the prostacyclin pathway. Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue and selexipag is a selective IP receptor agonist. Treprostinil can be delivered by a variety of routes including oral, inhaled, subcutaneous and intravenous. Selexipag is currently approved as an oral formulation. The impact of the route of deliver and the optimal dosing for transitioning inhaled treprostinil to oral treprostinil or selexipag is unknown. More importantly, given the different selectivity for prostacyclin receptors, it is uncertain whether treprostinil and selexipag can be substituted. We present two patients with PAH who received medications targeting the prostacyclin pathway and were transitioned from inhaled treprostinil to either oral treprostinil or selexipag. In both cases, we noted clinical, functional and hemodynamic deterioration. These cases highlight that the route of delivery (inhaled versus oral) and/or the specific PH medication (treprostinil versus selexipag) matter; therefore close monitoring during transitions is imperative.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.