SARS-CoV-2 is the agent responsible for COVID-19, the current pandemic, which is characterized by developing respiratory disturbances that are associated with severe hypoxemia associated with symptoms of non-bacterial pneumonia, ARDS up to multi-organ failure. It has been characterized by presenting 2 different phenotypes (phenotype L and phenotype H), with phenotype H being a stage of progressive deterioration of phenotype L, which depends on the earliness with which ventilatory management begins and the degree of inflammatory compromise. However, since VMI can generate VILI, the use of protective ventilation has been recommended as a ventilatory strategy for COVID-19. This review aims to comment on the available evidence of the essential aspects of protective IMV in the context of ARDS associated with COVID-19, in addition to the use of neuromuscular blockade and prone strategies.
Acute aortic syndrome includes a group of diseases that have clinical similarity in their natural history, the most important characteristic being their association with a high vital risk. The diagnosis and management of aortic dissection depends on the degree of aortic involvement according to the location of the lesion, as defined by the Stanford classification. In this syndrome, chest pain is considered the cardinal symptom; however, there are situations where clinical feedback is difficult. We present the case of a patient who debuted with a Stanford A aortic dissection, with an indication for surgical resolution in the acute phase, but who unexpectedly presented unspecific clinical manifestations. An opportune diagnosis was not obtained. After repeated consultations for changes in his symptoms, the definitive diagnosis was determined through imaging study, evolving favorably with ambulatory therapy.
Introduction Transfusion medicine develops and disseminates guidelines that govern the optimal conditions for transfusion. The purpose of this article is to review the current evidence on the use of blood components. Methods We searched PubMed, Scholar Google, ScienceDirect, SciELO and Cochrane web portals, as well as official documents published in the Chilean Society of Hematology. Articles from the last ten years were included, of which 42 were appropriate for this narrative literature review. Conclusion First of all, there is a controversy between two types of strategies regarding the practice of red blood cell transfusion: a liberal strategy and a restrictive strategy. Second, for the management of coagulopathies, clotting times do not reflect the true ability of patients to clot. Third, to reverse the effect of coumadin, the administration of vitamin K would suffice over the use of fresh frozen plasma. Fourth, the use of physiological triggers could help define the best time for a transfusion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.