Fluor-18-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has emerged as a promising diagnostic modality in recurrent colorectal carcinoma. Wholebody FDG-PET may be an accurate diagnostic modality to determine whether patients with recurrent hepatic disease are suitable candidates for curative resection. Reports on the use of FDG-PET in patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma are scarce, especially those on colorectal liver metastases. To assess the usefulness of this emerging modality for the selection of patients to undergo resection for colorectal liver metastases, a systematic (meta)-analysis of the current literature was conducted. In the absence of randomized controlled clinical trials, a traditional meta-analysis could not be performed. An alternative strategy was designed to evaluate the current literature. After a literature search, an index score was devised to evaluate the articles with regard to the impact of FDG-PET in patients with colorectal liver metastases. The index scored articles on several items and, as such, could be considered an objective approach for the assessment of diagnostic, nonrandomized clinical trials. The proposed index proved to be an independent instrument for judging several research questions and was used systematically to address the sensitivity, specificity, and clinical impact of FDG-PET in patients with colorectal liver metastases. For FDG-PET, the pooled sensitivity and specificity results were 88.0% and 96.1%, respectively, for hepatic disease and 91.5% and 95.4%, respectively, for extrahepatic disease. For the 6 articles that reported the highest scores on the index, the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for hepatic metastatic disease were 79.9% and 92.3%, respectively, and 91.2% and 98.4%, respectively, for extrahepatic disease, respectively. For computed tomography, the pooled sensitivity and specificity results were 82.7% and 84.1%, respectively, for hepatic lesions and 60.9% and 91.1%, respectively, for extrahepatic lesions.

Based on an iterative procedure, the RTL method has been shown to provide optimal threshold levels independent of the SBR and to be applicable in phantom and in patient studies. It is a promising tool for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification of PET lesions.

With the increasing possibilities for surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases, careful selection of patients who may benefit from surgical treatment becomes critical. The addition of PET to 18 F-FDG may significantly improve conventional staging by CT. Up to now, definitive evidence that the addition of 18 F-FDG PET to conventional staging leads to superior clinical results and improved clinical management in these patients has been lacking. In this randomized controlled trial in patients with colorectal liver metastases, we investigated whether the addition of 18 F-FDG PET is beneficial and reduces the number of futile laparotomies. Methods: A total of 150 patients with colorectal liver metastases selected for surgical treatment by imaging with CT were randomly assigned to CT only (n 5 75) or CT plus 18 F-FDG PET (n 5 75). Patients were followed up for at least 3 y. The primary outcome measure was futile laparotomy, defined as any laparotomy that did not result in complete tumor treatment, that revealed benign disease, or that did not result in a disease-free survival period longer than 6 mo. Results: Patient and tumor characteristics were similar for both groups. The number of futile laparotomies was 34 (45%) in the control arm without 18 F-FDG PET and 21 (28%) in the experimental arm with 18 F-FDG PET; the relative risk reduction was 38% (95% confidence interval, 4%260%, P 5 0.042). Conclusion: The number of futile laparotomies was reduced from 45% to 28%; thus, the addition of 18 F-FDG PET to the work-up for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases prevents unnecessary surgery in 1 of 6 patients.

Background Although self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement as bridge to surgery (BTS) in patients with left‐sided obstructing colonic cancer has shown promising short‐term results, it is used infrequently owing to uncertainty about its oncological safety. This population study compared long‐term oncological outcomes between emergency resection and SEMS placement as BTS. Methods Through a national collaborative research project, long‐term outcome data were collected for all patients who underwent resection for left‐sided obstructing colonic cancer between 2009 and 2016 in 75 Dutch hospitals. Patients were identified from the Dutch Colorectal Audit database. SEMS as BTS was compared with emergency resection in the curative setting after 1 : 2 propensity score matching. Results Some 222 patients who had a stent placed were matched to 444 who underwent emergency resection. The overall SEMS‐related perforation rate was 7·7 per cent (17 of 222). Three‐year locoregional recurrence rates after SEMS insertion and emergency resection were 11·4 and 13·6 per cent (P = 0·457), disease‐free survival rates were 58·8 and 52·6 per cent (P = 0·175), and overall survival rates were 74·0 and 68·3 per cent (P = 0·231), respectively. SEMS placement resulted in significantly fewer permanent stomas (23·9 versus 45·3 per cent; P < 0·001), especially in elderly patients (29·0 versus 57·9 per cent; P < 0·001). For patients in the SEMS group with or without perforation, 3‐year locoregional recurrence rates were 18 and 11·0 per cent (P = 0·432), disease‐free survival rates were 49 and 59·6 per cent (P = 0·717), and overall survival rates 61 and 75·1 per cent (P = 0·529), respectively. Conclusion Overall, SEMS as BTS seems an oncologically safe alternative to emergency resection with fewer permanent stomas. Nevertheless, the risk of SEMS‐related perforation, as well as permanent stoma, might influence shared decision‐making for individual patients.

BackgroundFor a selection of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), liver resection is a curative option. In order to predict long-term survival, clinicopathologic risk scores have been developed, but little is known about histologic factors and their prognostic value for disease-free and overall survival. The objective of the present study was to assess possible prognostic histologic factors in patients with solitary CRLM treated with liver resection who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment.MethodsPatients with solitary CRLM who underwent liver resection between 1992 and 2011 were evaluated for clinical prognostic factors. Histologic analyses on tumor thickness at the tumor–normal interface, presence of a fibrotic capsule, intrahepatic vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, or bile duct invasion and perineural growth were performed, using immunohistochemistry.ResultsA total of 124 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 41 months (range 1–232 months). There was no association between histologic factors and disease-free survival in multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, intrahepatic lymphatic invasion was associated with a decreased overall survival (41.9 vs. 61.0 months; p = 0.041), especially in combination with vascular invasion (n = 15) (28.1 vs. 62.2 months; p < 0.0001). In addition, size over 50 mm (29.2 vs. 65.9 months; p = 0.004) and interval less than 12 months between resection of the primary tumor and diagnosis of liver metastasis (49.0 vs. 91.5 months: p = 0.019) were also independent adverse prognostic factors.ConclusionsIntrahepatic lymphatic invasion, especially in combination with vascular invasion, is an important adverse prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with solitary CRLM after liver resection.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4562-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.