The reverse transcriptase inhibitor, nevirapine (NVP), causes skin rashes and hepatotoxicity. We used a rat model to determine if the rash is caused by the parent drug or a reactive metabolite. By manipulation of metabolic pathways and testing analogues, we eliminated all but one pathway, 12-hydroxylation, which involves the oxidation of an exocyclic methyl group, as being responsible for the rash. Treatment with 12-OH-NVP caused a rash, and an analogue in which the methyl hydrogens were replaced by deuterium to inhibit the 12-OH pathway did not cause a rash; however, quite unexpectedly, blood levels of the deuterated analogue were very low. This is due to partitioning of the benzylic free radial intermediate between oxygen rebound to form 12-OH-NVP and loss of another hydrogen atom to form a reactive quinone methide, which inactivates P450. Cotreatment with the P450 inhibitor, 1-aminobenzotriazole, led to comparable levels of NVP and the deuterated analogue, and the deuterated analogue still caused a lower rash incidence. These data clearly point to the 12-hydroxy pathway being responsible for NVP skin rash. We propose that the hepatotoxicity of NVP in humans is due to the quinone methide formed by P450 in the liver, while the skin rash may be due to the quinone methide formed in the skin by sulfation of 12-OH metabolite followed by loss of sulfate. This is the first example in which a valid animal model of an idiosyncratic drug reaction was used to determine the metabolic pathway responsible for the reaction.
Purpose: To determine the safety and tolerability of olaparib with cisplatin and gemcitabine, establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of the combination.Experimental Design: We conducted a phase I study of olaparib with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Treatment at dose level 1 (DL1) consisted of olaparib 100 mg orally every 12 hours on days 1 to 4, gemcitabine 500 mg/m 2 on days 3 and 10, and cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 on day 3. PAR levels were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).Results: Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in two of three patients at DL1 included thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia. The protocol was amended to enroll patients treated with 2 prior severely myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens and treated with olaparib 100 mg once daily on days 1 to 4 (DLÀ1). No DLTs were seen in six patients at DLÀ1. Because of persistent thrombocytopenia and neutropenia following a return to DL1, patients received 100 mg olaparib every 12 hours on day 1 only. No hematologic DLTs were observed; nonhematologic DLTs included gastrointestinal bleed, syncope, and hypoxia. Of 21 patients evaluable for response, two had partial response. Olaparib inhibited PARP in PBMCs and tumor tissue, although PAR levels were less effectively inhibited when olaparib was used for a short duration.Conclusions: Olaparib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine is associated with myelosuppression even at relatively low doses. Modified schedules of olaparib in chemotherapy naive patients will have to be explored with standard doses of chemotherapy.
Purpose To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor PF-04929113 (SNX-5422) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. Methods This was a single institution, phase I, dose-escalation study of PF-04929113 dosed twice-weekly. Endpoints included determination of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), MTD, the safety profile of PF-04929113, pharmacodynamic assessment of PF-04929113 on Hsp70 induction, pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of PF 04928473 (SNX-2112) and its prodrug PF-04929113 and assessment of response. Results Thirty three patients with advanced malignancies were treated. Dose escalation was continued up to 177 mg/m2 administered orally twice a week. One DLT (non-septic arthritis) was noted. No grade 4 adverse events (AEs) were seen; grade 3 AEs included diarrhea (9%), non-septic arthritis (3%), AST elevation (3%) and thrombocytopenia (3%). No objective responses were seen in 32 evaluable patients. Fifteen patients (47%) had stable disease; 17 patients (53%) had progressive disease. PK data revealed rapid absorption, hepatic and extra-hepatic clearance, extensive tissue binding and almost linear pharmacokinetics of the active drug PF 04928473. PD studies confirmed inhibition of Hsp90 and a linear correlation between PK parameters and Hsp70 induction. Conclusions PF-04929113 administered orally twice weekly is well tolerated and inhibits its intended target Hsp90. No objective responses were seen but long lasting stabilizations were obtained. Although no clinically significant drug-related ocular toxicity was seen in this study the development of PF-04929113 has been discontinued due to ocular toxicity seen in animal models and in a separate phase I study.
Olaparib (AZD2281) is an orally active PARP-1 inhibitor, primarily effective against cancers with BRCA1/2 mutations. It is currently in Phase III development and has previously been investigated in numerous clinical trials, both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. Despite this widespread testing, there is only one published method that provides assay details and stability studies for olaparib alone. A more sensitive uHPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of olaparib in human plasma was developed, increasing the range of quantification at both ends (0.5-50,000 ng/mL) compared to previously published methods (10-5,000 ng/mL). The wider range encompasses C MAX levels produced by typical olaparib doses and permits better pharmacokinetic modeling of olaparib elimination. This assay also utilizes a shorter analytical runtime, allowing for more rapid quantification and reduced use of reagents. A liquid-liquid extraction was followed by chromatographic separation on a Waters UPLC ® BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 µm) and mass spectrometric detection. The mass transitions m/z 435.4→281.1 and m/z 443.2→281.1 were used for olaparib and the internal standard [ 2 H 8 ]-olaparib, respectively. OPEN ACCESSChromatography 2014, 1 83The assay proved to be accurate (<9% deviation) and precise (CV < 11%). Stability studies showed that olaparib is stable at room temperature for 24 h. in whole blood, at 4 °C for 24 h post-extraction, at −80 °C in plasma for at least 19 months, and through three freeze-thaw cycles. This method proved to be robust for measuring olaparib levels in clinical samples from a Phase I trial.
Nevirapine, used for the treatment of HIV infection, is associated with development of skin rash and liver toxicity. The mechanism of these idiosyncratic reactions is unknown. We have previously reported the discovery of a new animal model of nevirapine-induced skin rash in rats. When treated with nevirapine, Brown Norway rats developed red ears on about day 7 and skin rash on about day 21. On rechallenge, ears turn red within 24 h, and skin lesions develop by day 9. In the current study, we analyzed the time course of the sequence of events involved in the development of skin rash. Rats were treated with nevirapine for 7, 14, or 21 days or rechallenged with it for 0, 1, or 9 days. This treatment led to an increase in the total number of auricular lymph node T, B, and macrophage cells. There was also an increase in the activation/infiltration marker ICAM-1 and activation/antigen presentation marker MHC II in these cells compared with those from control rats. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed macrophage infiltration and ICAM-1 expression in the ears of treated rats as early as day 7 of treatment. Macrophage infiltration preceded T cell infiltration, which was not apparent until the onset of rash. Both MHC I and MHC II expression increased in the skin of nevirapine-treated rats that developed rash. A major inducer of MHC is IFNgamma. Although rechallenge with nevirapine led to a large increase in serum levels of IFNgamma, this was not observed during the treatment of naïve rats with nevirapine. These observations provide further clues to the mechanism of nevirapine-induced skin rash.
Nevirapine treatment can cause a skin rash. We developed an animal model of this rash and determined that the 12-hydroxylation metabolic pathway is responsible for the rash, and treatment of animals with 12-OH-nevirapine also leads to a rash. In the present study, we investigated the specificity of lymphocytes in nevirapine-induced skin rash. Brown Norway rats were treated with nevirapine or 12-OH-nevirapine to induce a rash. Lymph nodes were removed, and the response of lymphocytes to nevirapine and its metabolites/analogs was determined by cytokine production (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay, and Luminex) and proliferation (alamar blue assay). Subsets of lymphocytes were depleted to determine which cells were responsible for cytokine production. Lymphocytes from animals rechallenged with nevirapine proliferated to nevirapine, but not to 12-OH-nevirapine or 4-chloro-nevirapine. They also produced interferon-␥ (IFN-␥) when exposed to nevirapine, significantly less when exposed to 4-chloro-nevirapine, and very little when exposed to 12-OHnevirapine, even though oxidation to 12-OH-nevirapine is required to induce the rash. Moreover, the specificity of lymphocytes from 12-OH-nevirapine-treated rats was the same, i.e., responding to nevirapine more than to 12-OH-nevirapine, even though these animals had never been exposed to nevirapine. A Luminex immunoassay showed that a variety of other cytokines/chemokines were also produced by nevirapine-stimulated lymphocytes. CD4 ϩ cells were the major source of IFN-␥. The specificity of lymphocytes in activation assays cannot be used to determine what initiated an immune response. This has significant implications for understanding the evolution of an immune response and the basis of the pharmacological interaction hypothesis.Nevirapine (NVP), marketed under the trade name Viramune (Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany), is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infections. Although effective, its use has been limited because of its propensity to cause skin rash and liver toxicity. In patients, skin rashes vary from mild erythematous, maculopapular rashes to more severe Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis (Warren et al., 1998;Fagot et al., 2001). Our group discovered a novel animal model of NVPinduced skin rash in rats. The characteristics of NVP-induced skin rash in Brown Norway rats are very similar to the milder rashes that occur in humans, which suggests that the mechanisms are very similar. Specifically, in both humans and rats there is a 2-to 3-week delay between starting the drug and the onset of rash, and on re-exposure, symptoms are more severe and accelerated (Shenton et al., 2003;Taiwo, 2006). Females are more susceptible to developing rash than males in both Brown Norway rats and humans. Furthermore, the sensitivity to NVP-induced skin rash can be transferred with CD4 ϩ T cells from NVP-rechallenged rats to naive recipients ...
Treatment of HIV-1 infections with nevirapine is associated with skin and liver toxicity. These two organ toxicities range from mild to severe, in rare cases resulting in life-threatening liver failure or toxic epidermal necrolysis. The study of the mechanistic steps leading to nevirapine-induced skin rash has been facilitated by the discovery of an animal model in which nevirapine causes a skin rash in rats that closely mimics the rash reported in patients. The similarity in characteristics of the rash between humans and rats strongly suggests that the basic mechanism is the same in both. The rash is clearly immune-mediated in rats, and partial depletion of CD4(+) T cells, but not CD8(+) T cells, is protective. We have demonstrated that the rash is related to the 12-hydroxylation of nevirapine rather than to the parent drug. This is presumably because the 12-hydroxy metabolite can be converted to a reactive quinone methide in skin, but that remains to be demonstrated. Although the rash is clearly related to the 12-hydroxy metabolite rather than the parent drug, cells from rechallenged animals respond ex vivo to the parent drug by producing cytokines such as interferon-gamma with little response to the 12-hydroxy metabolite, even when the rash was induced by treatment with the metabolite rather than the parent drug. This indicates that the response of T cells in vitro cannot be used to determine what caused an immune response. We are now studying the detailed steps by which the 12-hydroxy metabolite induces an immune response and skin rash. This animal model provides a unique tool to study the mechanistic details of an idiosyncratic drug reaction; however, it is likely that there are significant differences in the mechanisms of different idiosyncratic drug reactions, and therefore the results of these studies cannot safely be generalized to all idiosyncratic drug reactions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.