Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

No abstract

SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

Objective To analyze ambulatory movements and team dynamics during robot-assisted surgery (RAS), and investigate whether congestion of the physical space associated with RA technology led to workflow challenges, or predisposed to errors and adverse events. Methods With IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed 10 recorded RA radical prostatectomies in a single operating room (OR). OR was divided into 8 zones, and all movement were tracked and described in terms of start and end zones, duration, personnel, and purpose. Movement were further classified into avoidable (can be eliminated/improved) and unavoidable (necessary for completion of the procedure). Results Mean operative time was 166 minutes, of which ambulation constituted 27 minutes (16%). A total of 2,896 ambulatory movements were identified (mean=290 ambulatory movements/procedure). Most of movements were procedure-related (31%), and were performed by the circulating nurse. We identified 11 main pathways in the OR (Figure 1); the heaviest traffic was between the Circulating Nurse Zone, Transit Zone and Supply-1 Zone. Fifty percent of ambulatory movements were found to be avoidable. Conclusion More than half of the movements during RAS can be eliminated with an improved OR setting. More studies are needed to design an evidence-based OR layout that enhances access, workflow and patient safety.

This study objectively evaluated the cognitive engagement of a surgical mentor teaching technical skills during surgery. The study provides a deeper understanding of how surgical teaching actually works and opens new horizons for assessment and teaching of surgery. Further research is needed to study the feasibility of this novel concept in assessment and guidance of surgical performance.

No abstract

Castleman's disease is a rare disorder, yet a rarer newly described syndrome called TAFRO syndrome was discovered to accompany it. TAFRO represents the constellation of symptoms (Thrombocytopenia, Anasarca, MyeloFibrosis, Renal failure, Organomegaly). Most cases were described in Japan. We present the first case of TAFRO syndrome in Syria. A 58-year-old Caucasian male with no relevant history presented with fatigue, oliguria, decreased platelets, increased creatinine level, hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, pitting edema and lymph node enlargement. Possible differential diagnoses were excluded by laboratory, radiologic and cytologic tests including TB, malignancy and autoimmune diseases. A biopsy of a supraclavicular lymph node confirmed Castleman disease. Our patient had Catleman's disease, and presented with only four diagnostic criteria for TAFRO syndrome (Myelofibrosis was absent) in addition to other minor characteristics (microcytic anemia, negative HIV and HHV-8 infections.) which make the presentation consistent with TAFRO syndrome described in the Japanese cases. The criteria for diagnosing TAFRO syndrome are still changing, and the pathophysiology behind it is unclear. We recommend further research to understand this syndrome taking into account that its prevalence might be worldwide.

Communication gaps have been systematically linked to failures during surgery; however few studies have addressed challenges related to the remoteness of the surgeon during robot-assisted surgery (RAS). While studies on team communication in the Operating Room (OR) rarely report on nonverbal aspects, our initial work has shown that the vast majority of interaction events between the console surgeon and the right bed side assistant is nonverbal. This study focuses on improving our understanding of the nature of the multimodal interactions between surgeons and right bed side assistants. Six robot-assisted radical prostatectomies were recorded and the interaction events between the surgeon and the right bed side assistant were categorized by type (verbal/nonverbal), topic, and sender. The proportion of verbal and nonverbal events varied with the topic of the interaction. Strategies to improve team communication during surgery should take into account both the use of nonverbal communication means and the change in communication strategies based on purpose.