In clinical practice, biological markers are not available to routinely assess the progression of atherosclerotic disease or the development of restenosis following endarterectomy or catheter based interventions. Endarterectomy procedures provide an opportunity to study mechanisms of restenosis and progression of atherosclerotic disease since atherosclerotic tissue is obtained. Athero-Express is an ongoing prospective study, initiated in 2002, with the objective to investigate the etiological value of plaque characteristics for long term outcome. Patients are included who undergo an endarterectomy of the carotid artery. At baseline blood is withdrawn, patients fill in an extensive questionnaire and diagnostic examinations are performed. Atherosclerotic plaques are freshly harvested, immunohistochemically stained and examined for the presence of macrophages, smooth muscle cells, collagen and fat. Parts of the atherosclerotic plaques are freshly frozen to study protease activity and protein and RNA expressions. Patients undergo a duplex follow up to assess procedural restenosis (primary endpoint) at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years. Secondary endpoints encompass major adverse cardiovascular events. In the future, the creation of this biobank with atherosclerotic specimen will allow the design of cross-sectional and follow up studies with the objective to investigate the expression of newly discovered genes and proteins and their interaction with patients and plaque characteristics in the progression of atherosclerotic disease. Objective is to include 1000-1200 patients in 5 years. In January 2004, 289 patients had been included. It is expected that 250 patients will be included yearly.
Carotid artery plaques obtained from women have a more stable, less inflammatory phenotype compared with men, independent of clinical presentation and cardiovascular risk profile. Asymptomatic women demonstrate the highest prevalence of stable plaques. These findings could explain why women benefit less from carotid endarterectomy compared with men.
Summary
Background
Reoperation rates are high after surgery for hip fractures. We investigated the effect of a sliding hip screw versus cancellous screws on the risk of reoperation and other key outcomes.
Methods
For this international, multicentre, allocation concealed randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 50 years or older with a low-energy hip fracture requiring fracture fixation from 81 clinical centres in eight countries. Patients were assigned by minimisation with a centralised computer system to receive a single large-diameter screw with a side-plate (sliding hip screw) or the present standard of care, multiple small-diameter cancellous screws. Surgeons and patients were not blinded but the data analyst, while doing the analyses, remained blinded to treatment groups. The primary outcome was hip reoperation within 24 months after initial surgery to promote fracture healing, relieve pain, treat infection, or improve function. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00761813.
Findings
Between March 3, 2008, and March 31, 2014, we randomly assigned 1108 patients to receive a sliding hip screw (n=557) or cancellous screws (n=551). Reoperations within 24 months did not differ by type of surgical fixation in those included in the primary analysis: 107 (20%) of 542 patients in the sliding hip screw group versus 117 (22%) of 537 patients in the cancellous screws group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.63–1.09; p=0.18). Avascular necrosis was more common in the sliding hip screw group than in the cancellous screws group (50 patients [9%] vs 28 patients [5%]; HR 1.91, 1.06–3.44; p=0.0319). However, no significant difference was found between the number of medically related adverse events between groups (p=0.82; appendix); these events included pulmonary embolism (two patients [<1%] vs four [1%] patients; p=0.41) and sepsis (seven [1%] vs six [1%]; p=0.79).
Interpretation
In terms of reoperation rates the sliding hip screw shows no advantage, but some groups of patients (smokers and those with displaced or base of neck fractures) might do better with a sliding hip screw than with cancellous screws.
Funding
National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Stichting NutsOhra, Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Physicians’ Services Incorporated.
Plaque phenotype of patients with TIA is comparable to that of patients with stroke; whereas, the plaque phenotype of patients with AFX resembles the plaque phenotype of asymptomatic patients. Follow-up studies should be encouraged to determine whether plaque characteristics visualized by imaging techniques might help to identify patients most likely to benefit from CEA.
Surgical-site infection is a major complication following endarterectomy of the common femoral artery. The aim of this single-center study was to determine risk factors for surgical-site infection after endarterectomy of the common femoral artery and especially the possible association between patch type (venous, bovine, or prosthetic) and the occurrence of groin infection. Retrospectively 140 patients who underwent an endarterectomy of the common femoral artery between 2003 and 2006 were reviewed. About 20 patients (14%) suffered from a surgical-site infection (12 superficial and 8 deep, of which 2 with involvement of the patch). All infections occurred within 30 days postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference between type of patch and surgical-site infection. However, using multivariate analysis, previous arterial surgery in the groin (P = .013) and a wound drain left postoperatively (P = .016) were independent variables for the development of a surgical-site infection after endarterectomy of the common femoral artery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.