With the global economy in crisis, there is great need for a deeper understanding of Australia's economic place in the world – both today and throughout history. This new edition of Barrie Dyster and David Meredith's highly successful book is fully updated and includes three new chapters covering until the end of 2011. The book explores the evolution of Australia's position in the global economy from the start of the twentieth century through to the present day, examining the international and local economies of five key historical periods. With a focus on trade, foreign investment and immigration, the book considers periods both of growth and decline. By using historical perspectives to explain the present and give direction to the future, this unique book presents a rich account of Australia's position within a global economic context. It is an essential resource for students and lecturers of Australian economic history.
Australia should be the country lawyers most love to study. In the half century after the first British settlement was established in 1788, the majority of immigrants to Australia had been selected by judges and juries in Britain and Ireland. They were convicts. Although their discipline was a perennial concern of the colonial authorities, breaches of discipline could not be punished in a summary fashion. Convicts had to be brought before a court, where they could give evidence and even initiate complaints. It was not simply that early Australia was saturated in law. A full complement of legal institutions and legal practices evolved in this anomalous society. This is the paradox presented, unintentionally, by Robert Hughes in his best-selling book The Fatal Shore (1987); 1 the first gulag became a complacent law-abiding community. Why, then, did it take The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology twenty-four years, until its forty-eighth issue in 1991, to accept or commission articles on the startling criminological experiment that had taken place in its own country? The best explanation is a double one. First, the historically orthodox view of the convicts since 1950 has been that they came from a self-perpetuating criminal caste in the United Kingdom. Because they were outside the normal class structure, they were uninteresting to social scientists; the idea of a separate criminal class has been an easy but disabling concept for scholars. Second, the apparently conventional outcome of Australian society after its apparently lurid origins seems to defy logic, so the problem has been sidestepped. In the last fifteen years, most historians of nineteenth-century England have undermined and rejected the stereotype of a distinct criminal class; crime was committed by people inside the class structure. The publication in 1988 of a collection called Convict Workers, edited by Stephen Nicholas, 2 brought this new orthodoxy to Australia. Convict Workers demonstrated that the convicts were members of the conventional working classes at both ends of the voyage. Their destiny in Australia was work, with which they were familiar before their transportation. Essays by Garton and Dyster 3 provide a history of this debate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.