I ntrapartum fetal monitoring, most commonly continuous electronic fetal heart rate by cardiotocography, was developed to prevent adverse perinatal outcomes associated with fetal asphyxia. Cardiotocography has reduced rates of neonatal seizures, but not perinatal mortality, and has increased operative delivery rates due to its poor sensitivity in predicting fetal compromise. Sensitivity can be enhanced significantly by using fetal blood sampling (FBS), which directly measures fetal capillary pH, base excess, or lactate. This monitoring technique reduces the rate of emergency cesarean section (CS) for nonreassuring fetal status. It is an invasive procedure, however, that has undesirable effects, that is, maternal discomfort, fetal scalp abscess, hemorrhage, and a failure rate of 11% to 20%. The technical difficulties and relatively small risk, however, can be justified by the reduction in CS rates. The authors of this retrospective study analyzed a group of consecutive parturients who had FBS to determine whether the rate of CS was increased in those undergoing sampling in early labor (r3 cm dilation) compared with those having it during established labor (Z4 cm dilation). The study also examined whether repeated FBS was associated with poorer neonatal outcomes.The study took place in 1 secondary and 1 tertiary obstetric unit in Manchester, England, between March 2008 and June 2009. Data were obtained from case notes and medical records for 381 women undergoing FBS. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding variables. The median age of women studied was 27 years; mean body mass index was 25.6. The majority (67.4%) of patients were nulliparous, and the ethnicity distribution was representative of the general delivery population in the units participating in the study. Overall, 123 women (32.4%) had spontaneous vaginal deliveries; 118 (31%) had CS; and 140 (36.7%) had instrumental vaginal deliveries. Thirty-three (8.7%) women had a first FBS at r3 cm (early-labor group), whereas 348 (91.3%) had progressed to Z4 cm (later-labor group) at the time of FBS; 147 (38.6%) required 2 or more samplings. Of the early-labor group, 48.4% had instrumental or spontaneous vaginal delivery, compared with 71.9% of the established-labor group. The odds ratio (OR) of the early-labor group for CS was 2.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-5.40], versus the established-labor group, although this OR dropped to 1.8 (95% CI, 1.04-3.13) after adjustment for factors that could affect the likelihood of CS (eg, parity, previous CS, body mass index, induction/augmentation, and maternal age). In women requiring Z2 FBSs, the OR for CS was 1.71 (95% CI, 1.37-2.13) compared with women requiring only a single sample. All babies were liveborn, with a mean birth weight of 3360 g. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes (umbilical artery pH, Apgar scores, neonatal intensive care unit admission) between infants whose mothers underwent FBS early versus later in labor. When Z3 samples were obtained during labor, ...