No abstract

No abstract

Abstract-The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has separate clinical structures and care processes for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, because veterans are returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with TBI (most frequently mild TBI [mTBI]) and PTSD, the VA needs to evaluate current service delivery systems. We conducted key informant interviews with 40 providers from across the United States who represented separate clinical teams providing specialized TBI or PTSD services. We identified challenges providers perceive in scheduling and engaging patients with co-occurring mTBI and PTSD (mTBI/ PTSD) in treatment, determining the etiology of patients' presenting problems, coordinating services, and knowing whether or how to alter standard treatments. We found consensus that patients with mTBI/PTSD often have other morbidities requiring specialized treatment, including pain and sleep disturbance. Another important theme we found was the need for patient and family educational material on mTBI/PTSD or pain and mTBI/PTSD and provider education tailored to provider specialty. Together, findings point to the need for guidance for providers on best practices to assess and treat mTBI/PTSD given available information, a systematic approach toward patient and provider education, and research to build the evidence base for practice.

Combat-injured polytrauma patients have complex rehabilitation needs that require a high level of specialized training and skill. Physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists treating war injured service members need a high level of expertise in assessment and treatment of co-occurring pain, TBI, and stress disorders. Physiatrists are playing an important role in providing and coordinating the rehabilitation care for individuals with significant polytraumatic war injuries from the Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) conflicts.

Persistent problems after traumatic brain injury: The need for long-term follow-up and coordinated careTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability in the United States [1]. Survivors of TBI experience various problems, including physical, cognitive, emotional, and community integration issues. Established in 1992, the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) coordinates nine healthcare centers-two civilian, three military, and four Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sites-that provide evidence-based treatment, education, and research on TBI (www.dvbic.org). Patients with TBI who are admitted to regional medical centers within the DVBIC network receive multidisciplinary assessment and rehabilitation by experts in physiatry (physical medicine and rehabilitation [PM&R]), neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, and other allied health professions. After discharge, DVBIC patients are also advised to return for onsite, 3-day comprehensive follow-up evaluations at 1 and 2 years postinjury.To determine the prevalence of a constellation of problems faced by the TBI patients admitted to our Palo Alto VA facility, we performed an extensive chart review on 138 patients who had sustained closed head injuries. These patients were enrolled in the DVBIC program at the Palo Alto VA from 1993 to 2003 and ranged in age from 18 to 76 (median = 27). Of these patients, 71 percent returned for either the 1 or 2 year follow-up at the Palo Alto site and 49 percent returned for both follow-ups. Compared with the patients who returned for both follow-ups, those who missed one or both follow-ups had more emotional symptoms at baseline (mean = 3.2 vs 2.4 symptoms/patient, p < 0.005) but fewer cognitive impairments (4.2 vs 5.9 impairments/patient, p < 0.001). The two groups did not differ significantly in age or the frequency of physical symptoms at baseline (4.4 vs 4.6, p = 0.5).The present analysis focused on those who returned for both follow-ups. We evaluated the patients' problems in four areas: physical, cognitive, emotional, and community integration, using standardized neurocognitive tests and structured clinical interviews. Physical problems were mainly documented by the physiatrist and included pain, motor weakness, gait abnormality, seizure, dizziness, and fatigue. Cognitive deficits were primarily measured by the neuropsychologist and included deficits in attention/concentration, processing speed, memory, problem-solving, executive organization, and safety judgment. Emotional issues, mainly identified by the psychiatrist, included depressed mood, anxiety, posttraumatic distress, suicidal ideation, irritability, and disinhibition. Community integration issues, primarily evaluated by the occupational therapist, included problems with self-care, money management, employment, community accessibility, recreational activities, and adjustment to limitations.As Figure 1 demonstrates, 90 percent or more of TBI patients had at least one problem in each category at baseline, i.e., dur...

Abstract-The conflicts in Iraq andAfghanistan have resulted in a new generation of combat survivors with complex physical injuries and emotional trauma. This article reports the initial implementation of the Polytrauma Network Site (PNS) clinic, which is a key component of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Polytrauma System of Care and serves military personnel returning from combat. The PNS clinic in Palo Alto, California, is described to demonstrate the VA healthcare system's evolving effort to meet the clinical needs of this population. We summarize the following features of this interdisciplinary program: (1) sequential assessment, from initial traumatic brain injury screening throughout our catchment area to evaluation by the PNS clinic team, and (2) clinical evaluation results for the first 62 clinic patients. In summary, this population shows a high prevalence of postconcussion symptoms, posttraumatic stress, poor cognitive performance, head and back pain, auditory and visual symptoms, and problems with dizziness or balance. An anonymous patient feedback survey, which we used to fine-tune the clinic process, reflected high satisfaction with this new program. We hope that the lessons learned at one site will enhance the identification and treatment of veterans with polytrauma across the country.

The field of traumatic brain injury has evolved since the time of the Civil War in response to the needs of patients with injuries and disabilities resulting from war. The Department of Veterans Affairs and the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center have been in the forefront of the development of the interdisciplinary approach to the rehabilitation of soldiers with traumatic brain injury, particularly those injured from the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. The objectives of this literature review are to examine how the casualties resulting from major wars in the past led to the establishment of the current model of evaluation and treatment of traumatic brain injury and to review how the field has expanded in response to the growing cohort of military service members and veterans with TBI.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and The Department of Defense (DoD) guidelines are based upon the best information available at the time of publication. They are designed to provide information and assist decision-making. They are not intended to define a standard of care and should not be construed as one. Neither should they be interpreted as prescribing an exclusive course of management.Variations in practice will inevitably and appropriately occur when providers take into account the needs of individual patients, available resources, and limitations unique to an institution or type of practice. Every healthcare professional making use of these guidelines is responsible for evaluating the appropriateness of applying them in the setting of any particular clinical situation.