Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.
Abstract. HPV involvement in head and neck (HN) cancer is still under active investigation. Fresh frozen and archival clinical samples from 115 patients affected by HN carcinomas were analysed by PCR-based methods and direct sequencing. HPV types, intra-type variants, physical status, viral load and viral transcript presence were determined. HPV positivity was correlated with the main clinical-pathological features, including smoker and drinker status, and the clinical outcome. Twenty-one tumours were HPV positive (18.3%) with HPV16 being the most frequent type (n=14) followed by HPV6 (n=4), HPV33, HPV35, and HPV58 (n=1, each type). Tonsil carcinomas contained more high-risk HPV types (6/8; 75%) than all other sites (p=0.0004). HPV16 genome was integrated in all analysed tumours, as pure integrated form or mixed with concomitant episomal forms (4 cases). The viral load showed a wide variability (range, 0.7-485 copies per cell) with the highest value detected in a larynx tumour and the lowest one in a case of cancer of the oral cavity. In 9 HPVpositive samples where mRNA was available, transcripts of viral early oncogenes originating by integrated, episomal or mixed forms of the viral genome were found. A statistically significant correlation was evidenced between HPV and tumour differentiation, being the virus more associated with tumour grade G3/G4. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that lymph-node and grade status were significant independent factors for a worse disease-free survival and overall survival, whereas the HPV status was associated with a better overall survival (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.81; p=0.01). Taken together these results indicate that distinct pathological mechanisms for the malignant transformation in each single HN subsite should be taken in account; HPV molecular analyses should be considered a valid tool to distinguish subsets of oropharyngeal tumours and HPV presence could be useful for the prognostic assessment of HNSCC. IntroductionTumours of the oral cavity and pharynx have been estimated at 643,000 cases for 2002, with 349,000 deaths (1). The incidence of these cancers is traditionally found to be very high in some areas of the world (e.g., France and South India), but in the last decade other areas (e.g., Eastern Europe and Japan) reported an increasing incidence of head and neck (HN) squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) (2). HN cancer constitutes one of the most difficult pathologies to eradicate. Recurrences are frequent and about a half of patients die (1). The heterogeneity of treatment response and the lack of prognostic factors could be the main causes of the adverse clinical outcome. Moreover, the behaviour variability of each individual tumour has also emphasized the difficulties of managing these tumours.Life habits such as the intake of toxic agents present in tobacco smoke, alcohol drink and betel chewing, or poor hygiene remain major risk factors for these tumours. However, the fraction of HN cancers attributable to these risk factors is close to 80-90%, while the...
Performing a proper nasal and oropharyngeal swab procedure is essential in the screening of COVID‐19 infection. The video illustration of nasal and oropharyngeal swab is presented (Video S1). To correctly perform the nasopharyngeal swab, the patient must be seated comfortably with the back of their head against the headrest. The swab is inserted in the nose horizontally, along an imaginary line between the nostril and the ear. Oropharyngeal sampling is easier to perform. The swab is directed toward the rear wall of the oropharynx and it is rotated a few times before removal. After taking the sample, it is necessary to insert both swabs in the same tube, breaking the rod with one swift and controlled movement. Finally, carefully reset the cap. It appears to be extremely important to properly collect nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs in order to minimize the false negative rate among COVID‐19 positive patients.
SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.