Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (HEART2D) is a multinational, randomized, controlled trial designed to compare the effects of prandial versus fasting glycemic control on risk for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Patients (type 2 diabetes, aged 30 -75 years) were randomly assigned within 21 days after AMI to the 1) prandial strategy (PRANDIAL) (three premeal doses of insulin lispro targeting 2-h postprandial blood glucose Ͻ7.5 mmol/l) or the 2) basal strategy (BASAL) (NPH twice daily or insulin glargine once daily targeting fasting/premeal blood glucose Ͻ6.7 mmol/l).RESULTS -A total of 1,115 patients were randomly assigned (PRANDIAL n ϭ 557; BASAL n ϭ 558), and the mean patient participation after randomization was 963 days (range 1-1,687 days). The trial was stopped for lack of efficacy. Risks of first combined adjudicated primary cardiovascular events in the PRANDIAL (n ϭ 174, 31.2%) and BASAL (n ϭ 181, 32.4%) groups were similar (hazard ratio 0.98 [95% CI 0.8 -1.21]). Mean A1C did not differ between the PRANDIAL and BASAL groups (7.7 Ϯ 0.1 vs. 7.8 Ϯ 0.1%; P ϭ 0.4) during the study. The PRANDIAL group showed a lower daily mean postprandial blood glucose (7.8 vs. 8.6 mmol/l; P Ͻ 0.01) and 2-h postprandial blood glucose excursion (0.1 vs. 1.3 mmol/l; P Ͻ 0.001) versus the BASAL group. The BASAL group showed lower mean fasting blood glucose (7.0 vs. 8.1 mmol/l; P Ͻ 0.001) and similar daily fasting/premeal blood glucose (7.7 vs. 7.3 mmol/l; P ϭ 0.233) versus the PRANDIAL group.CONCLUSIONS -Treating diabetic survivors of AMI with prandial versus basal strategies achieved differences in fasting blood glucose, less-than-expected differences in postprandial blood glucose, similar levels of A1C, and no difference in risk for future cardiovascular event rates.
In patients with Type 2 diabetes and inadequate glucose control while on insulin or insulin and oral agent(s) combination therapy, treatment with a twice-daily insulin lispro mixture plus metformin, which targets both post-prandial and pre-meal BG, provided clinically significant improvements in A1c, significantly reduced post-prandial BG after each meal, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycaemia as compared with once-daily glargine plus metformin, a treatment that targets fasting BG.
We investigated the influence of a program of exercise training consisting of three weekly sessions, each 45 min long, for 12 wk, on indices of physical fitness, glycemic control, and insulin sensitivity in nine adolescents with type I diabetes; six age-matched adolescents with diabetes of equivalent duration served as nonexercised controls. All subjects were instructed not to change dialy insulin dose or caloric intake. In the exercised group, maximal oxygen uptake during graded cycle ergometry to volitional exhaustion increased by 9 +/- 2.7% (P less than 0.01) and lean body mass increased by 4 +/- 1.8% (P less than 0.05). Insulin sensitivity, assessed via the euglycemic clamp technique at insulin infusion rates of 100 mU/M2/min, showed an increase of insulin-mediated glucose disposal from 274 +/- 33 to 338 +/- 28 mg/M2/min, representing an increase in insulin sensitivity of 23 +/- 5% (P less than 0.01). None of these indices changed in the control group. Despite increased insulin sensitivity, glycohemoglobin levels remained at 12 +/- 1% before and after the 12 wk of exercise training, indicating no improvement in overall glycemic control. No increase in hypoglycemic reactions was reported in either group. We conclude that exercise training may be a valuable adjunct in managing type I diabetes providing there is concomitant attention to diet and insulin. Exercise training alone, however, does not improve glycemic control, although it improves physical fitness and insulin sensitivity.
Atherosclerotic vascular disease is more common in diabetic than in nondiabetic individuals. Diabetic macrovascular disease also has a more severe course with greater prevalence of multiplevessel coronary artery disease and more diffuse elongated atheromas in affected blood vessels. In this review, we discuss possible reasons for increased incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events in individuals with diabetes. Although an increased prevalence of standard CV risk factors has been clearly documented in association with diabetes, diabetes-related abnormalities, particularly hyperglycemia, also play an important role. Epidemiological studies suggest that the effect of hyperglycemia on CV risk is independent of other known risk factors, but no data from primary interventional trials are available yet. Analysis of datasets from populations that included individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose suggest that the pathogenic role of hyperglycemia on the blood vessel wall already exists in the early stages of glucose intolerance. The effect of postprandial or postchallenge hyperglycemia seems to be greater than the effect of fasting blood glucose abnormalities. The relationship of postprandial glycemia, fasting blood glucose, and CV risk in individuals with diagnosed (or overt) diabetes is less clear, although most reports indicate a greater pathogenic potential of postprandial hyperglycemia rather than fasting hyperglycemia. Based on the results of epidemiological reports, the most appropriate targets in interventional trials are postprandial hyperglycemia or A1C.Diabetes Care 31 (Suppl. 2):S155-S160, 2008
Objective. To measure daily physical activity in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (IRA] and in healthy controls, and to identify variables that may influence physical activity in IRA patients.Methods. Twenty-three prepubertal children, ages 5-11 years, with mild to moderate IRA and no prior exposure to systemic glucocorticosteroids, were compared to 23 healthy children of similar age. Physical activity was measured for 3 days (minimum of one weekend day] using 3 standardized methods simultaneously. Total body movement was assessed by the Caltrac accelerometer and the University of Cincinnati Motion Sensor (UCMS]. The Caltrac measured movement in the vertical plane; the UCMS measured movement of 10" or more from the horizontal plane. The type and intensity of daily physical activity was measured by the %day activity record, which also recorded the number of hours of daily sleep. Participation and duration of involvement in organized sports was ascertained by questionnaire.
114Results. The mean physical activity was significantly lower in JRA patients than in controls for the activity diary {P = 0.05). However, daily body movement measured by the Caltrac and UCMS were similar for both groups. Differences were seen in the number of hours of sleep per day (P = 0.02) and participation in strenuous activities (P < 0.01). IRA patients had significantly less participation in organized sports [P = 0.011.Conclusion. There was less daily physical activity by this group of JRA patients than for healthy ageand sex-matched control subjects.
In brief: Fourteen adolescents (eight females and six males) with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) participated in a 12-week exercise program consisting of three 45-minute sessions per week. Exercise consisted of calisthenic warm-up and stretching (ten minutes), aerobic movement to music (25 minutes at 80% V o2 max), and cool-down (ten minutes). The purpose was to determine whether and to what degree such training would bring about changes in blood lipid and lipoprotein profiles in such patients. The authors found a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concomitant to an increase in V o2 max with no change in glycemic control. These findings support the beneficial effects of regular exercise for individuals with IDDM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.