Latinos in the United States experience numerous alcohol-related health disparities. There is accumulating evidence that pre-immigration factors are associated with post-immigration alcohol use, but the explanation for health disparities remains unclear. The present study is a secondary analysis of data from the Recent Latino Immigrant Study (RLIS), the first community-based cohort study to examine the pre- to post-immigration alcohol use trajectories of young adult Latino immigrants during their initial years in the United States. Exploratory analysis and hierarchical multiple logistic regression were performed to assess associations between various pre- and post-immigration factors and alcohol misuse among young adult Latino immigrants early in the immigration process. Using an ecodevelopmental approach, we examined potential social and environmental determinants across multiple levels of influence associated with post-immigration alcohol misuse in this population. The study sample consisted of 474 young adult Latino immigrants between the ages of 18–34. The sample was comprised of the following national/regional origins: Cuban (43%), South American (28.7%), and Central American (28.3%). Approximately half of the sample (49.6%) reported a family history of substance use problems (FHSUP+). Participants who reported FHSUP+ and who engaged in alcohol misuse prior to immigrating to the US were more likely to engage in post-immigration alcohol misuse. Results revealed various social and environmental factors associated with pre-immigration alcohol misuse in this population. Study findings can inform culturally tailored prevention interventions aimed at mitigating problem drinking behaviors among young adult recent Latino immigrants.
Introduction Macroglossia occurs in 80% to 99% of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) and a variety of surgical techniques for tongue reduction are offered by surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of the anterior “W” tongue reduction technique in patients with BWS. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all patients diagnosed with BWS that underwent an anterior “W” tongue reduction for macroglossia in the past 7 years, performed by 2 surgeons. Demographics, procedural characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and complications were assessed. Results A total of 19 patients met inclusion criteria consisting of 8 male and 11 female patients. The mean age at the time of surgery was 405 days, mean surgeon operating time was 1.06 h, and mean length of follow-up was 467 days. Postoperative oral competence was observed in 100% of patients. There was no reported history of sleep apnea or airway compromise. Speech delay was seen in 4 patients pre- and postoperatively. Feeding issues decreased from 7 patients preoperatively to 1 patient postoperatively. Preoperative prevalence of class III malocclusion (53%) and isolated anterior open bite (26%) decreased postoperatively to 37% and 16%, respectively. The only reported complications were superficial tip wound dehiscence in 3 patients treated with nystatin antifungal therapy. None of the patients required revisional surgery. Conclusion Patients treated with the anterior “W” tongue reduction technique had low rates of perioperative complications and significant improvements in oral competence. Anterior “W” tongue reduction is safe and effective for the correction of macroglossia in patients with BWS.
Backgrounds/Aims: Current literature presents limited data regarding outcomes following conversion at the time of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MI-PD). Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients were stratified into three groups: MI-PD, converted to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (CO-PD), and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (O-PD). Multivariable modeling was applied to compare outcomes of MI-PD and CO-PD to those of O-PD. Results: Of 17,570 patients identified, 12.5%, 4.2%, and 83.4% underwent MI-PD, CO-PD, and O-PD, respectively. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (R-PD) resulted in a higher lymph node yield (n = 23.2 ± 12.2) even when requiring conversion (n = 22.4 ± 13.2, p < 0.001). Margin positivity was higher in the CO-PD group (26.6%) than in the MI-PD group (21.3%) and the O-PD (22.6%) group (p = 0.017). Length of stay was shorter in the MI-PD group (laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy 10.4 ± 8.6, R-PD 10.6 ± 8.8) and the robotic converted to open group (10.7 ± 6.4) than in the laparoscopic converted to open group (11.2 ± 9) and the O-PD group (11.5 ± 8.9) (p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, both MI-PD (odds ratio = 1.40; p < 0.001) and CO-PD (odds ratio = 1.24; p = 0.020) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of long-term survival. Conclusions: CO-PD does not negatively impact perioperative or oncologic outcomes.
Frontonasal dysplasia (FND) is a rare congenital craniofacial cleft syndrome associated with a spectrum of midline facial bone and soft-tissue malformations. When present, the physical features of FND are often obvious and classified at birth. The resultant facial deformities have the potential to negatively influence psychosocial health and quality of life. Reconstructive surgical intervention in early childhood can serve to restore facial contour and alleviate psychological stress. In this report, a case of a 14-year-old female with previously undiagnosed mild form of FND presented for reconstructive surgery evaluation and underwent several procedures including sliding advanced genioplasty, submucosal resection of the nasal turbinates, open rhinoplasty, and bilateral transnasal medial canthopexies. The patient had subsequent nasal tip recontouring for persistent supratip fullness. The patient achieved an acceptable esthetic outcome and was satisfied with her physical appearance. This case emphasizes the subtle presentation and reconstructive surgical options of a mild case of FND that was diagnosed at a later age, unlike the more severe phenotypes of the syndrome and other common craniofacial anomalies that are usually diagnosed and treated in early childhood. Multidisciplinary craniofacial care teams should be able to correctly diagnose and implement the appropriate surgical interventions in patients with milder forms of FND.
Sturge Weber Syndrome is characterized by the classic triad of a facial port-wine stain, leptomeningeal angiomatosis, and glaucoma. The resultant facial vascular anomaly can lead to soft tissue and bone irregularities, causing psychosocial distress and mental health morbidity. When severe, patients can opt for multi-staged surgical intervention by reconstructive surgeons to restore normal symmetry and improve the aesthetic appearance of the face. This study reports a case of surgical correction for severe facial vascular malformation resulting in poor outcomes due to the associated mental comorbidities seen in Sturge Weber Syndrome. A 37-year-old male with previously diagnosed Sturge Weber Syndrome presented to the outpatient craniofacial clinic for surgical evaluation of a large facial tuberous hemangioma. The patient underwent multiple operations for facial reconstruction including a staged full-thickness skin graft, facial recontouring, and extracranial correction of vertical orbital dystopia. The case was complicated by the patient’s poorly controlled seizure disorder and psychosocial illness, resulting in self-mutilation of the repair and poor follow-up. Over the span of 10 years, the patient’s mental illness caused him to fail numerous attempts at facial restoration and ultimately led to a poor final result. The psychosocial distress seen in patients with Sturge Weber Syndrome can adversely affect surgical outcomes. Physicians should be mindful of the possible complications that can arise in these patients and have the clinical means to address them.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.