Bioindicators assess the mangroves ecological state according to the types of pressures but they differ with the ecosystem’s specificities. We investigated benthic meiofauna diversity and structure within the low human-impacted mangroves in French Guiana (South America) in response to sediment variables with various distances to the main city. Contaminant’s concentrations differed among the stations, but they remained below toxicity guidelines. Meiofauna structure (Foraminifera, Kinorhyncha, Nematoda) however varied accordingly. Nematode’s identification brought details on the sediment’s quality. The opportunistic genus Paraethmolaimus (Jensen, 1994) strongly correlated to the higher concentrations of Hg, Pb. Anoxic sediments were marked by organic enrichment in pesticides, PCB, and mangrove litter products and dominance of two tolerant genus, Terschellingia (de Man, 1888) and Spirinia (Gerlach, 1963). In each of these two stations, we found many Desmodora individuals (de Man, 1889) with the presence of epibionts highlighting the nematodes decreased fitness and defenses. Oxic sediments without contaminants were distinguished by the sensitive genera Pseudocella (Filipjev, 1927) and a higher diversity of trophic groups. Our results suggested a nematodes sensitivity to low contaminants concentrations. Further investigations at different spatio-temporal scales and levels of deterioration, would be necessary to use of this group as bioindicator of the mangroves’ ecological status.
The impact of concrete composition and roughness on the formation of microalgal biofilms and their photobiology were studied on marine infrastructures presenting four different compositions combined with two degrees of roughness (rough and smooth). The structures were first inoculated with a natural microphytobenthic biofilm and immersed in sterilised seawater with a controlled photoperiod for six days. Photosynthetic activity was assessed with an imaging PAM-(Pulse Amplitude Modulated) fluorometer and microtopography was monitored in parallel with a 3-D camera. The results indicated that roughness had an impact on the biofilm biomass, its physiological status and its photosynthetic efficiency and capacity. The assessment of surface roughness indicated that negative reliefs were preferably colonised by MPB (microphytobenthos) cells with better photosynthetic performances. Moreover, MPB biofilms showed better photoacclimation in these microhabitats than on the positive and smooth reliefs. This study confirms the importance of microhabitat for biofilm formation and their photobiology.
In the Marineff project, experimental eco-engineering dyke modules were immersed in 2020 in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel). Eco-engineering and classic dyke modules were compared regarding biodiversity and productivity. This paper presents the monitoring strategy of primary production assessment applied. Primary production assessment was performed by coupling various technics in order to consider all the compartments of primary producers present on the dykes and in the associated surrounding water mass. Seaweeds, microphytobenthos and phytoplankton were studied. Benthic chambers measuring oxygen and pCO2 under controlled light, and technics based on variable fluorescence were applied on eco-engineering and classic dyke modules. Preliminary results are presented in order to illustrate the expected indicator and methodology improvement and limits were discussed. The whole data set will allow us to explore the relationship between productivity and biodiversity as a function of the sites and of the nature of the infrastructure, eco-engineering or not. At this stage of our study we pointed out that the macroalgae were 7.9 times more productive than biofilm per surface on eco-engineering module whilst only 1.5 times on classic module. Smooth surface appeared to favour biofilm productivity at this stage of colonisation while rough surface drove more quickly the system to a production dominated by macroalgae.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.