The pottery craft in Indonesia faces a challenge in the postmodern era that demands them to self-adjust. This study uses qualitative approach in the case study of the Bayat Klaten's pottery industry. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and documentation. Data analysis was done using Miles and Huberman's interactive model. The findings reveal that (1) the social system at Bayat's ceramics industry was a collaborative effort among the Bayat community. This is a contributing factor in facing the challenges in postmodern era. (2) The production of the products is adjusted with the needs of the current time and creative approach. (3) There are many types of modification in the Bayat pottery products, yet they still represent old elements such as ornaments as decoration. This study is expected to develop the creative thinking skill among high school/vocational high school students through pottery making.
This study aims to examine the development and relationship between art and the selfie trend in the postmodern era. The development of technology in the digital communication era, as well as various facilities and social media, have resulted in an increased selfie trend. The selfie phenomenon has become a lifestyle for all smartphone users. Ultimately, it is seen not only as a form of narcissism, but also a piece of artwork that has value. This study employs a qualitative approach, focusing on phenomenology study. The research context is on the art in selfie photographs.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif untuk menjelaskan pelaksanaan dan kualitas instrumen penilaian sumatif oleh satuan pendidikan yang berfokus pada penilaian aspek kognitif. Sampel dipilih melalui teknik random sampling. Data penelitian adalah data pelaksanaan dan instrumen penilaian hasil belajar sumatif mata pelajaran Seni Budaya aspek Seni Rupa di SMP Kabupaten Sleman berupa tes objektif dari kegiatan Penilaian Tengah Semester (PTS), Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) dan Penilaian Akhir Tahun (PAT) pada tahun 2019-2020. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan analisis statistika deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan penilaian sumatif dilaksanakan oleh para guru Seni Budaya sesuai dengan acuan-acuan pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 yang disesuaikan dengan kebijakan sekolah. Instrumen utama penilaian sumatif tersebut berupa soal pilihan ganda dengan empat pilihan jawaban. Secara umum kualitas soal tersebut sangat baik dari segi materi, konstruksi, dan bahasa. Dari segi tingkat kesukaran, secara umum instrumen penilaian tersebut masih didominasi soal dengan tingkat kesukaran mudah dan sedang dan dari segi tingkat pengetahuan masih didominasi soal dalam kategori tingkat ingatan dan pemahaman dan belum mencakup soal untuk kategori high order thinking skill. Kata Kunci: kualitas instrumen, penilaian sumatif, seni rupa, SMP kabupaten Sleman THE QUALITY OF INSTRUMENTS OF ART LEARNING SUMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN SLEMAN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Abstract This research is a quantitative descriptive study to explain the implementation and quality of summative assessment instruments by educational units that focus on assessing cognitive aspects. The sample was selected by random sampling technique. The research data is the implementation and the assessment instruments for summative learning outcomes in the arts and cultural subject focusing on art aspect in junior high schools of Sleman Regency in the form of objective tests of Mid-Semester Assessment (PTS), Final Semester Assessment (PAS) and Year-End Assessment (PAT) in 2019 -2020. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis. The results showed that Cultural Arts teachers carried out the implementation of summative assessment in accordance with the guidelines for implementing the 2013 Curriculum, which was adjusted to school. The main instrument for summative assessment is multiple-choice questions with four answer choices. In general, the quality of the questions was very good in terms of material, construction, and language. In terms of the level of difficulty, in general, the assessment instrument is still dominated by questions with easy and moderate difficulty levels, and very little covers difficult questions. In terms of the level of knowledge, it is still dominated by questions in the category of memory and understanding levels. It does not include questions for the high-order thinking skill category. Keywords: instrument quality, summative assessment, art learning.
This article examines the existence, role, and practice of Art for Children (AFC) Yogyakarta as a community art center for children in Yogyakarta. Due to its cultural and educational setting, the children’s art center serves as an alternative for non-formal art education. The data were gathered by the passive participant observation, in-depth interview, and document review and analyzed by using the interactive model. The research results in four things. First, the establishment of the Art for Children (AFC) meets the needs of the self-actualization of both the artists and the parents in nurturing children’s art. Teaching art to children becomes the honorable way for the artists to reach his self-fulfillment as artists as well as members of a society and, on the other hand, engaging their children’s in the art center is the responsibility for the parents to fulfill their aesthetic needs and to support their children’s education. Second, the lesson emphasizes the process rather than the result; it is oriented to the development of art educational values rather than artistic skills. The training process involves collaboration between the artists and the parents. The artists engage the parents in active participation of guiding the children. Third, through this strategy the children have produced original and creative drawings and paintings worthwhile for children’s aesthetic education and cultural activity in the city.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.