Asymptomatic malarial parasitemia is highly prevalent in Plasmodium falciparum endemic areas and often associated with increased prevalence of mild to moderate anemia. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of anemia during asymptomatic malaria parasitemia and its interplay with persistent infection in highly exposed individuals. A household-based longitudinal survey was undertaken in a malaria hyperendemic area in Cameroon using multiplex nested polymerase chain reaction to detect plasmodial infections. Residents with P. falciparum asymptomatic parasitemia were monitored over a 3-week period with the aid of structured questionnaires and weekly measurements of axillary temperatures. Of the 353 individuals included (median age: 26 years, range 2–86 years, male/female sex ratio 0.9), 328 (92.9%) were positive for malaria parasitemia of whom 266 (81.1%) were asymptomatic carriers. The prevalence of anemia in the study population was 38.6%, of which 69.2% were asymptomatic. Multivariate analyses identified high parasitemia (> 327 parasites/µL) and female gender as associated risk factors of asymptomatic malarial anemia in the population. Furthermore, risk analyses revealed female gender and anemia at the time of enrolment as key predictors of early development of febrile illness (< 3 weeks post enrolment) among the asymptomatic individuals. Together, the data reveal an extremely high prevalence of asymptomatic malaria parasitemia and anemia in the study area, unveiling for the first time the association of asymptomatic malarial anemia with early clinical conversion from asymptomatic to symptomatic infection. Furthermore, these findings underscore the negative impact of asymptomatic malaria parasitemia on individual health, necessitating the development of appropriate control and preventive measures.
Presence of mature gametocyte forms of malaria parasites in peripheral blood is a key requirement for malaria transmission. Yet, studies conducted in most malaria transmission zones report the absence of gametocyte in the majority of patients. We therefore sought to determine the risk factors of both all-stage and mature gametocyte carriage in an area with high stable transmission of Plasmodium falciparum in Cameroon. Gametocyte positivity was determined using three complementary methods: thick blood smear microscopy, RT-PCR and RT-LAMP, whereas exposure to the infection was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Of 361 malaria endemic residents randomly included in the study (mean age: 28±23 years, age range: 2–100 years, male/female sex ratio: 1.1), 87.8% were diagnosed with P . falciparum infection, of whom 45.7% presented with fever (axillary body temperature ≥37.5°C). Mature gametocyte positivity was 1.9% by thick blood smear microscopy and 8.9% by RT-PCR targeting the mature gametocyte transcript, Pfs25 . The gametocyte positivity rate was 24.1% and 36.3% by RT-PCR or RT-LAMP, respectively, when targeting the sexual stage marker, Pfs16 . Multivariate analyses revealed anemia as a common independent risk factor for both mature and all-stage gametocyte carriage, whereas fever and low anti-gametocyte antibody levels were independently associated with all-stage gametocyte carriage only. Taken together, the data suggest important differences in risk factors of gametocyte carriage depending on stage analyzed, with anemia, fever and low antiplasmodial plasma antibody levels representing the major contributing risk factors.
BackgroundPlasmodium falciparum infected erythrocytes sequestering in placental tissue release Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) and histidine-rich protein-II (HRP-II). These proteins can be detected in peripheral blood using monoclonal antibody-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Nevertheless, studies to evaluate the reliability of RDTs in detecting placental malaria compared with microscopy of placental tissue impression smear (PTIS) as the gold standard are scarce.MethodsBetween August 2013 and January 2015, Giemsa-stained blood smears for peripheral blood smear (Pbs), placental intervillous space (IVS) blood smear and placental tissue impression smear (PTIS)] were prepared from HIV-negative women during delivery at the Marie Reine Medical Health Centre in Yaoundé, Cameroon. RDTs with monoclonal antibodies specific to HRP-II (P.f) or pLDH (Pan) antigens were used to screen maternal peripheral blood samples.ResultsThe prevalence of malaria was 16%, 7.5%, 11.5%, 8% and 13% for One Step malaria HRP-II and pLDH RDTs, peripheral blood smear, IVS blood and placental tissue impression smears, respectively. The proportion of women positive by One Step malaria pLDH RDT and Pbs increased with parasite density in PTIS, while One Step malaria HRP-II RDT detected high proportion of infected women even with low parasite density. Although the prevalence of malaria infection by both microscopy and RDTs decreased significantly with mother age (0.0008 ≤ p ≤ 0.025), parity seemed to have very little influence. The sensitivity of One Step malaria HRP-II and pLDH RDTs were 96.15% and 61.53%, respectively, compared to 80.76% for Pbs (p = 0.014 and 0.0029, respectively). The specificity of these RDTs was 96.49% and 100%, respectively, compared to 100% for Pbs (p ≥ 0.12). In addition, the positive predictive values were 80.64% and 100% for HRP-II and pLDH-based RDTs, respectively, compared to 100% for Pbs (p < 0.0001 and 1, respectively), while the negative predictive values were 99.40% and 94.48%, respectively, compared to 97.16% for Pbs (p ≥ 0.49). The combination of One Step malaria HRP-II RDT and Pbs showed the similar performance as that observed with One Step malaria HRP-II RDT only.ConclusionThese results depict One Step malaria HRP-II RDT to be better in detecting placental P. falciparum infection in pregnant women compared to Giemsa-stained peripheral thick blood smear. This is important for better case management since microscopic examination of PTIS cannot be employed during pregnancy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.