BackgroundThe spectrum of pathogens causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) in cancer patients has shown significant fluctuations in different geographical areas and time. We studied the microbial spectrum and drug-resistance profile of pathogens causing BSIs in febrile cancer patients at a referral hospital in Ethiopia.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2011 and June 2012 at Tikur Anbessa Hospital in Addis Ababa. Blood cultures from febrile cancer patients (n=107) were performed. Bacterial and fungal pathogens were identified and antimicrobial susceptibility testing done for the bacterial isolates using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method.ResultsA total of 82 pathogens were isolated from 112 blood culture tests of the 76 patients: 71 (86.6%) of the isolates were bacteria and 11 (13.4%) were fungi. The majority (60.5% [43 of 71]) of the isolates were Gram-positive bacteria, where Staphylococcus aureus was predominant (72% [31 of 43]), and 68% of S. aureus isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone and oxacillin. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 39.5% (28 of 71) of the isolates. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (17.9% [five of 28]) was the most frequent Gram-negative isolate. In Gram-negative bacteria, the highest rates of resistance were observed in amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (80% [12 of 15]), followed by ceftriaxone (73.3%) and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (73.3%). Multidrug resistance (resistance to three or more types of antibiotics, in this case to ceftriaxone, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) was observed in 26.3% (13 of 43) of Gram-positive and 40% (six of 16) of Gram-negative bacteria. Neutropenia was an independent risk factor for BSIs (P=0.02).ConclusionGram-positive bacteria were the predominant etiologic agents of BSIs in Ethiopian patients with cancer. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria showed an increasing level of resistance for most of the antibiotics used for empiric therapy. Routine bacterial surveillance and study of their resistance patterns must be an essential component of cancer-related infection control and care in our setting.
BackgroundIn recent years, saprophytic bacteria have been emerging as potential human pathogens causing life-threatening infections in patients with malignancies. However, evidence is lacking concerning such bacteria, particularly in sub-Saharan countries. This study was designed to determine the spectrum and drug resistance profile of the rare bacterial pathogens causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) in febrile cancer patients at a referral hospital in Ethiopia.MethodsBetween December 2011 and June 2012, blood samples were collected from 107 patients with cancer in Tikur Anbessa hospital. Culturing was performed using the blood culture bottles and solid media and the microorganisms were identified using the gram staining and APINE identification kits (Biomerieux, France). The disk diffusion method was used for the antimicrobial susceptibility testing.ResultsOverall, 13 (12.2%) rare human pathogens were isolated from 107 adult febrile cancer patients investigated. Aeromonas hydrophilia species (a fermentative gram-negative rod) was the predominant isolate, 30.8% (4/13), followed by Chryseomonas luteola 15.4% (2/13), Sphignomonas poucimobilis 15.4% (2/13), and Pseudomonas fluorescens 15.4% (2/13). Of the nine isolates tested for a nine set of antibiotics, 89% were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole.ConclusionsThis study revealed the emergence of saprophytic bacteria as potential drug-resistant nosocomial pathogens in Ethiopian patients with cancer. As these pathogens are ubiquitous in the environment, infection prevention actions should be strengthened in the hospital and early diagnosis and treatment with appropriate antibiotics are warranted for those already infected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.