No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The knowledge of the main mechanical constants of a rock mass (such as strength, deformability and the Poisson's ratio) is one of the most important for rock engineering design on or in rock mass. Until now, several empirical relationships were determined for calculating these material constants based on both the quality of the studied rock mass (ie. RMR or GSI values) IntroductionLarge scale rock mass characterization introduces material parameters related to mechanical properties. The most important properties are the deformation modulus; the unconfined strength and the Poisson's ratio value of the rock mass in interest. These material parameters are frequently related to laboratory data characteristics of intact rock samples and to the classical rock mass classification systems (e.g. RQD, Q, RMR or GSI). These rock mass quality measures quantify the relation between the rock mass and the intact rock.The established empirical relations between the mechanical parameters of rock masses (unconfined compressive strength, deformation modulus) and the rock mass classification systems (RMR or GSI values) show exponential increasing deformation modulus and compressive strength with the increasing quality of the rock mass.The paper summarizes the observed correlations published between the mechanical properties of rock masses and one of the rock mass classification systems. It was found, that the deformation modulus and the strength of a rock mass data may reflect a simple exponential relationship of the observed quantities. According to analysis of different proposed equations a new formula is suggested and the modification ratio (i.e. ratio of the deformation modulus and the strength of rock mass) is also determined.However, it is important to note, that there are huge differences between the published date and the empirical formulas. The reason for this variance is the difference in situ testing methods, that may give different values of mechanical parameters even for the same rock mass. According to Bieniawski [1], even a single testing method, such as flat jack test, can lead to a widely scattering results even where the rock mass is very uniform. The other reason for the discrepancy in the different calculation methods is the directional effect. Most rock masses are anisotropic and do not have single deformation modulus [2].There is no mechanical (physical) interpretation of the above empirical equations but these were analysed by e.g. [3]. Recently, Ván and Vásárhelyi [4] suggested a damage mechanical approach to analyse them. In this paper their method will be also presented.

Matra Gravitational and Geophysical Laboratory (MGGL) has been established near Gyöngyösoroszi, Hungary in 2015, in the cavern system of an unused ore mine. The Laboratory is located at 88 m below the surface, with the aim to measure and analyse the advantages of the underground installation of third generation gravitational wave detectors. Specialized instruments have been installed to measure seismic, infrasound, electromagnetic noise, and the variation of the cosmic muon flux. In the preliminary (RUN-0) test period, March-August 2016, data collection has been accomplished. In this paper we describe the research potential of the MGGL, list the installed equipments and summarize the experimental results of RUN-0. Here we report RUN-0 data, that prepares systematic and synchronized data collection of the next run period.

The determination of deformation parameters of rock material is an essential part of any design in rock mechanics. The goal of this paper is to show, that there is a relationship between static and dynamic modulus of elasticity (E), modulus of rigidity (G) and bulk modulus (K). For this purpose, different data on igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks, all of which are widely used as construction materials, were collected and analyzed from literature. New linear and nonlinear relationships have been proposed and results confirmed a strong correlation between static and dynamic moduli of rock species. According to rock types, for igneous rocks, the best correlation between static and dynamic modulus of elasticity (E) were nonlinear logarithmic and power ones; for sedimentary rocks were linear and for metamorphic rocks were nonlinear logarithmic and power correlation. Moreover, with respect to different published linear correlations between static modulus of elasticity (E stat ) and dynamic modulus of elasticity (E dyn ), an interesting correlation for rock material constants was established. It was found that the static modulus of elasticity depends on the dynamic modulus only with one parameter formula.