Background:The manifestations of oral changes and disorders affecting the geriatric population are different from the rest of the population. Inaccessibility to dental care is a compelling impediment to avail oral health services.Objective:The aims were to assess the dental and oral problems and to find out the determinants of oral health seeking behaviour among elderly population of Al-Jouf province, Saudi Arabia.Methods:The present cross sectional study included geriatric patients of 60 years and above, who visited the College of Dentistry, Al-Jouf University. A simple pre-structured questionnaire was filled by the patients, which comprised of demographic details and the different oral complaints of elderly and the type of health care utilized for those complaints.Results:Out of total 892 elderly persons included, 51.79% were males and 48.21 were females. The most common oral problem was missing tooth (78.69%) followed by gum problems (74.21%). 39.5% males and 28.0% females visited general dental practitioners for oral health care. Majority of the participants (32.8%) suggested accessibility as a basic factor in determining the health care source. The difference in the distribution of male and females or association between the type of care and gender and distribution for choosing a health care source was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05).Conclusion:Inaccessibility to dental care emerged as an important barrier to avail oral health services. Adequate access to medical and dental care can reduce premature morbidity and mortality, preserve function, and enhance overall quality of life.
Background: Personality factors might influence participants' satisfaction and the effects of dental management on daily living.Purpose: This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to assess the impacts of two types of implant-supported maxillary anterior crown restorations on daily living and participants' satisfaction, and its correlations with personality profiles.Materials and Methods: One hundred and seventy participants (84 males and 86 females; mean age = 35 ± 9 years) obtained maxillary anterior implant-supported crowns. They were allocated into two treatment groups (85 participants each: 43 females and 42 males). Group 1 was treated with titanium abutment-supported porcelain fused to metal (PFM) restorations. Group 2 was treated with zirconium abutment-supported ceramic restorations. A control group (85 participants each: 43 females and 42 males) that matched the treatment groups in gender and age was recruited. Precise clinical standards were followed to judge the clinical success of treatment. The NEO Five-Factor Inventory was used to evaluate participants' personality profiles. The dental impact on daily living questionnaire (DIDL) was used to evaluate restoration impacts on daily living and participants' satisfaction. Statistical analysis was carried out with probability of α = .05.Results: Higher DIDL scores were reported after crown treatments (P < .001). Group 2 participants reported highest levels of satisfaction with appearance (P = .007). DIDL scores were significantly associated with neuroticism, extraversion, and openness scores (P < .05) before restoration, and, with neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness scores (P < .05) after restoration.Conclusion: Implant-supported crown restorations in anterior maxillary region were associated with positive impacts on daily living and participants' satisfaction. Implantsupported ceramic crowns and abutments were accompanied with higher levels of satisfaction with appearance than implant-supported PFM crowns and titanium abutments. Certain personality and psychological features (neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness) might affect and predict dental satisfaction and impacts on daily living.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.