As most critically ill or injured patients will require some degree of sedation, the goal of this paper was to comprehensively review the literature associated with use of sedative agents in the intensive care unit (ICU). The first and selected latter portions of this article present a narrative overview of the shifting paradigm in ICU sedation practices, indications for uninterrupted or prolonged ICU sedation, and the pharmacology of sedative agents. In the second portion, we conducted a structured, although not entirely systematic, review of the available evidence associated with use of alternative sedative agents in critically ill or injured adults. Data sources for this review were derived by searching OVID MEDLINE and PubMed from their first available date until May 2012 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses and economic evaluations. Advances in the technology of mechanical ventilation have permitted clinicians to limit the use of sedation among the critically ill through daily sedative interruptions or other means. These practices have been reported to result in improved mortality, a decreased length of ICU and hospital stay and a lower risk of drug-associated delirium. However, in some cases, prolonged or uninterrupted sedation may still be indicated, such as when patients develop intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury. The pharmacokinetics of sedative agents have clinical importance and may be altered by critical illness or injury, co-morbid conditions and/or drug-drug interactions. Although use of validated sedation scales to monitor depth of sedation is likely to reduce adverse events, they have no utility for patients receiving neuromuscular receptor blocking agents. Depth of sedation monitoring devices such as the Bispectral Index (BIS©) also have limitations. Among existing RCTs, no sedative agent has been reported to improve the risk of mortality among the critically ill or injured. Moreover, although propofol may be associated with a shorter time to tracheal extubation and recovery from sedation than midazolam, the risk of hypertriglyceridaemia and hypotension is higher with propofol. Despite dexmedetomidine being linked with a lower risk of drug-associated delirium than alternative sedative agents, this drug increases risk of bradycardia and hypotension. Among adults with severe traumatic brain injury, there are insufficient data to suggest that any single sedative agent decreases the risk of subsequent poor neurological outcomes or mortality. The lack of examination of confounders, including the type of healthcare system in which the investigation was conducted, is a major limitation of existing pharmacoeconomic analyses, which likely limits generalizability of their results.

With the COVID-19 pandemic, we are in unprecedented times - our clinical environment is changing rapidly and may continue to do so in the future. Over the last decade there has been an increased support for the use of internal medicine point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) across the country and worldwide. While standard infection control guidelines are available on device and tranducer cleaning and disinfection, these recommendations may not apply during the COVID-19 pandemic. While we anticipate that the experience and need for POCUS deployment will differ across the country depending on several contextual factors, similar principles will likely emerge across multiple settings. To that end, to enable POCUS readiness, we recommend that each program/ practice site consider undertaking the following steps and recommendations on a semi-urgent basis if POCUS use is anticipated. The objective of this article to provide internists who currently use POCUS with the interim recommendations on processes that need to be in place prior to its use. This document refers primarily to the non-critical use of ultrasound devices based on the Spaulding classification6 (see Appendix for definitions) and does not apply to the setting of critical use where sterilization is required, nor semi-critical use, where high-level disinfection is required. Each institution must have its own policy in place on the cleaning and disinfection procedures for POCUS. This doucument is meant to serve as an adjunct to existing protocols.

Studies have established that diabetic patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) may have increased mortality. The primary objective of this study was to investigate if time to first appropriate antibiotic in the emergency department (ED) was associated with in-hospital mortality of CAP in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). This was a retrospective cohort study of adult diabetic patients who were admitted with CAP. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received first dose of appropriate antibiotic within 8 hours of triage and those who received it later than 8 hours. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. Two hundred six patients were included in the study. Fifty-nine patients (28.6%) had complications of CAP on admission and 31 patients (16%) died. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients who received their initial appropriate antibiotic after 8 hours of triage than those who received it within 8 hours [18 (35.3%), 15 (9.7%), p < 0.0001]. Time to first appropriate antibiotic later than 8 hours of triage was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (OR 4, 95% CI 1.2-13.1, p = 0.02). Antibiotic administration later than 8 hours of triage in the ED was associated with increased in-hospital mortality of CAP among patients with DM.

No abstract