No abstract

Summary Polymer flooding is one of the most widely used chemical enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) methods because of its simplicity and low cost. To achieve high oil recoveries, large quantities of polymer solution are often injected through a small wellbore. Sometimes, the economic success of the project is only feasible when injection rate is high for high-viscosity solution. However, injection of viscous polymer solutions has been a concern for the field application of polymer flooding. The pressure increase in polymer injectors can be attributed to (1) formation of an oil bank, (2) polymer rheology (shear-thickening behavior near wellbore), and (3) plugging of the reservoir pores by insoluble polymer molecules or suspended particles in the water. In this paper, a new model to history match field injection-rate/pressure data is proposed. The pertinent equations for deep-bed filtration and external-cake buildup in radial coordinates were coupled to the viscoelastic polymer rheology to capture important mechanisms. Radial coordinates were selected to minimize the velocity/shear-rate errors caused by gridblock size in the Cartesian coordinates. The filtration theory was used and the field data history matched successfully. Systematic simulations were performed, and the impact of adsorption (retention), shear thickening, deep-bed filtration, and external-cake formation was investigated to explain the well-injectivity behavior of polymer. The simulation results indicate that the gradual increase in bottomhole pressure (BHP) during early times is attributed to the shear-thickening rheology at high velocities experienced by viscoelastic hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) polymers around the wellbore and the permeability reduction caused by polymer adsorption and internal filtration of undissolved polymer. However, the linear impedance during external-cake growth is responsible for the sharper increase in injection pressure at the later times. One can use the proposed model to calculate the injectivity of the polymer-injection wells, understand the contribution of different phenomena to the pressure rise in the wells, locate the plugging or damage that may be caused by polymer, and accordingly design the chemical stimulation if necessary.

Polymer flooding is one of the most widely used chemical enhanced oil recovery methods due to its simplicity and low cost. To achieve high oil recoveries, large quantities of polymer solution is often injected through a small wellbore. Sometimes, the economic success of the project is only feasible when injection rate is high for high viscosity solution. However, injection of viscous polymer solutions has been a concern for the field application of polymer flooding. The pressure increase in polymer injectors can be attributed to (1) formation of an oil bank, (2) polymer rheology (shear-thickening behavior at near well-bore), and (3) plugging of the reservoir pores by insoluble polymer molecules or suspended particles in the water. In this paper, we propose a new model to history match field injection rate/pressure data. The pertinent equations for deep-bed filtration and external cake build-up in radial coordinate were coupled to the viscoelastic polymer rheology to capture important mechanisms. We selected radial coordinate in order to minimize the velocity/shear rate errors due to gridblock size in Cartesian coordinate. We used filtration theory and successfully history matched the field data. We performed systematic simulations and studied the impact of adsorption (retention), shear thickening, deep bed filtration, and external cake formation to explain the well injectivity behavior of polymer. The simulation results indicate that the gradual increase in bottomhole pressure during early times is attributed to the shear thickening rheology at high velocities experienced by viscoelastic HPAM polymers around the wellbore and the permeability reduction due to polymer adsorption and internal filtration of undissolved polymer. However, the linear impedance during external cake growth is responsible for the sharper increase in injection pressure at the later times. The proposed model can be used to calculate the injectivity of the polymer injection wells, understand the contribution of different phenomena on the pressure rise in the wells, locate the plugging or damage that may be caused by polymer, and accordingly design the chemical stimulation if necessary.

No abstract

Polymer flooding is a mature EOR technique, which is successfully applied in both sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. In ongoing polymer projects, make-up brine is either formation water, sea water or any available water sources like deep or shallow aquifers. In this paper we focus on the use of low salinity water as the make-up brine. The objectives of combining low salinity flooding (LSF) with polymer flooding are three-fold:Using low salinity brine reduces the amount of polymer required to obtain the target viscosity, which may lead to significant cost reduction.Combining the benefit of low salinity flooding with polymer flooding leads to higher oil recovery over conventional polymer flooding.Enhancing the elasticity of polymers by using low salinity brine which may lead to reduced Sorw and increased oil recovery. In addition to the objectives mentioned above, the use of a low-salinity make-up brine can give other benefits, such as better polymer stability (especially at high temperatures), lower sensitivity to polymer shear degradation, lower polymer adsorption and lower scaling and souring tendency. The paper will presentExperimental procedures for investigating the potential benefits of low salinity polymer on both the required polymer concentration and the oil recovery.Experimental results for several field casesDe-risking activities that were undertaken to mitigate any potential negative impact of using low salinity polymer, in the areas of clay swelling, polymer shear sensitivity, mixing and adsorption. The paper concludes that low-salinity polymer flooding can significantly improve existing and anticipated polymer flooding projects by reducing polymer volumes and/or increasing oil recovery. Low-salinity polymer flooding provides opportunities to apply polymer flooding in high-salinity and high-temperature reservoirs, for which polymer flooding with produced or formation water would be technically unfeasible or uneconomic.