Cytogenetic investigations were performed in 781 couples prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) because of severe male infertility or fertilization failures in previous in-vitro fertilization attempts. Out of these 1562 patients, 1012 had a normal karyotype without any aberrations (64.8%), 204 patients had an abnormal karyotypes (13.1%). These chromosome aberrations included constitutional aberrations (4.4%), fragile sites of autosomes (3.0%), low level mosaicism of sex chromosomes (4.0%) and secondary structural chromosome aberrations (4.2%). Combinations of different types of abnormalities were stated. Another 346 patients (22.1%) showed single cell aberrations; the significance of these is unclear at the moment. Constitutional chromosome aberrations were detected in 69 patients. The following chromosome aberrations were observed: 35 sex chromosomal aberrations (comprising hyperploidies of X or Y chromosomes, mosaicisms and derivative X and Y chromosomes), 34 autosomal aberrations including 14 reciprocal translocations, five Robertsonian translocations, six inversions, one marker chromosome, one trisomy 18 mosaicism and seven other structural aberrations. Three autosomal regions showed fragile sites: 6q13 in 2.9% of the patients, 17p12 and 10q24 in 0.05% each. In conclusion, our data show that a high number of infertile couples in an ICSI programme are affected by chromosome aberrations which occur in both sexes. It is suggested that a chromosomal analysis should be performed on both partners before ICSI treatment is initiated.
We evaluated the frequency of chromosomal aberrations and microdeletions of the Y chromosome in a sample of 204 patients included in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programme. The prevalence of Y chromosome deletions in males with severely or only moderately reduced sparm counts is mainly unknown, so that patients were chosen with sperm counts ranging from mild oligozoospermia to azoospermia. While six out of 158 (3.8%) patients showed constitutional chromosomal aberrations, only two out of 204 (0.98%) patients were diagnosed with a microdeletion of Yq11. One had a terminal deletion in subinterval 6 of Yq11.23 which included the DAZ gene and a corresponding sperm count < 0.1 x 10(6) spermatozoa/ml. The second patient had an isolated deletion of marker Y6PH54c, a more proximal site in subinterval 5 on Yq11.23, but repeatedly showed sperm counts of 3-8 x 10(8) spermatozoa/ml. Thus, of the 158 patients who underwent a combined cytogenetic and Y-microdeletion screening, eight patients (5.1%) showed chromosomal abnormalities, either at the cytogenatic (n = 6) or the molecular level (n = 2). In conclusion, although rare in number, microdeletions of the Y chromosome can also be observed in patients with moderately reduced sperm counts. A more proximal site of the deletion breakpoint does not necessarily imply a more severe impairment of spermatogenesis than a distal deletion site. In our sample, the overall frequency of constitutional chromosomal aberrations exceeded the incidence of microdeletions of the Y chromosome even in patients with idiopathic azoo- or severe oligozoospermia.
We evaluated the frequency of congenital chromosomal aberrations in a sample of 305 couples included in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programme. Twenty individuals (3.3%) with congenital chromosomal abnormalities could be identified. The following types of abnormalities were observed: reciprocal translocations (n = 7), Robertsonian translocations (n = 3), inversions (n = 3), other structural aberrations (n = 4) and sex chromosome aberrations (n = 3). The rate of chromosomally abnormal males (10/305, 3.3%) lay within the expected range for patients with reduced semen quality. Surprisingly, 50% (10/20) of all abnormal karyotypes were contributed by the female partner of ICSI patients. These data confirm the higher incidence of chromosomal aberrations in infertile populations as compared with the baseline population risk. Additionally, the data imply that in some cases of male factor infertility a hidden female chromosomal factor may be present, which cannot be identified by standard clinical evaluation. In conclusion, we recommend chromosomal analysis in both partners of couples undergoing ICSI treatment.
A complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) with eight breakpoints resulting in four derivative chromosomes (4, 11, 12 and 13) was detected prenatally in a male fetus of a twin pregnancy. The karyotype of the female second fetus was normal. The apparently balanced de novo CCR was identified by classical cytogenetic methods and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We compared these findings with results from spectral karyotyping (SKY).
This paper reports on results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients in whom constitutional or secondary chromosome aberrations were detected in the male and/or female partner. Out of 434 couples treated by ICSI (590 cycles), 16 couples (3.7%) were affected by constitutional chromosome aberrations and 96 (22.1%) by secondary chromosome aberrations. Constitutional chromosome aberrations were found in eight male and eight female patients. Couples with the aberration in the male showed significantly lower fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates (P < 0.05). The occurrence of female constitutional chromosome aberrations led to lower fertilization rates but implantation and pregnancy rates were similar to a control group; however, a higher abortion rate was noted. In the group with secondary chromosome aberrations, 22 males and 59 females carried an abnormality and in 15 couples, both partners. Compared to the remaining (unaffected) 322 couples, fertilization and embryo transfer rates were reduced but implantation rates and pregnancy rates were not different. In all couples where an abortion occurred, mainly parental autosomal aberrations were involved (six out of eight). Our retrospective analysis shows that an unexpectedly high number of infertile couples in an ICSI programme are affected by chromosome aberrations, which in turn may explain the reduced fertilization rates observed in this subgroup of patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.