This study examined the association between two primary covariates, extent of disease (ED) and performance status rating (PSR), and the outcome of psychological distress in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung. Patients were studied at the time of entry onto one of three Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocols: 7781 (N = 165) and 8083 (N = 139) for limited disease; and 7782 (N = 151) for extensive disease. Besides ED (limited versus extensive), a four-point rating of PSR was obtained. Psychological distress was measured by the standardized Profile of Mood States (POMS). Gender, age, marital status, education, PSR, ED and two relevant interaction terms (PSR X ED; gender X ED) were analyzed using multiple linear and hierarchical regressions. Of the six main variables, gender and PSR had significant association with POMS total mood disturbance, a summary score for POMS emotional subscales, and most of the individual subscales. The PSR X ED interaction provided a rationale for testing a new regression model in which PSR and ED were combined into a single index of impairment. The final index resulted in five levels of physical impairment which bear an approximately linear relationship to increasing levels of distress (Overall regression, P less than 0.001). These data suggest that PSR is an important factor in modelling POMS distress at both levels of ED, and that ED becomes an important factor with poorer performance status only.

In this double-blind, two-period, crossover trial with randomized treatment assignment, progabide (+/- 30 mg/kg/day) and placebo were compared as add-on to standard therapy in 20 "therapy-resistant" epileptic patients (11 males, nine females; age range, 7-47 years). The duration of each treatment period was 6 weeks. Crossover was performed gradually over 3-4 days. Twenty-four patients entered the study: three dropped out for reasons unrelated to progabide effects; one dropped out during the placebo period because of increased seizure frequency. Of the 20 patients who completed the study, 14 had partial, two partial plus secondary generalized, and four generalized seizures. Preexisting antiepileptic treatment consisted of one antiepileptic drug (AED) in three, two AEDs in eight, three AEDs in five, and four AEDs in four patients (mean, 2.5 AEDs/patient). The following parameters were recorded at biweekly intervals: (a) efficacy parameters--total seizure count, counts of each seizure type, and global clinical judgment; (b) safety parameters--adverse drug effects, brief clinical and neurological examinations, and laboratory tests; and (c) plasma concentrations of progabide and of the associated AEDs. Twelve patients were considered to be improved (p less than 0.01) with progabide by global clinical judgment compared with two patients improved with placebo. Nine patients of 20 had a 48-100% reduction of total seizure count in the verum period, leading to a significant reduction of total seizure number and of complex partial seizures in the verum period as compared with the placebo period (p less than 0.05). Adverse effects were reported or observed in 10 patients during the progabide period and in five patients in the placebo period. The side effects were generally mild and consisted of somnolence in four cases and of tremors, dry mouth, troubles of equilibrium, anorexia, euphoria, depression, and anxiety in individual patients; a 15-20% reduction of the progabide dose was required in two cases only. No treatment-related alterations in results of laboratory tests were observed.

Fengabine is a new GABAmimetic compound active in animal models predictive of antidepressant activity. The present overview reports the results of 6 double-blind trials versus tricyclics (TCAs) (3 in outpatients and 3 in inpatients). Overall, 398 adult patients (149 males and 249 females) were treated; 194 with fengabine and 204 with TCAs (98 clomipramine, 63 amitriptyline and 43 imipramine). 284 suffered from major depression (MD) (including major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, depressed; DSM III) and 114 from minor depression (MiD) including dysthymic disorder, atypical depression and adjustment disorder with depressive mood (DSM III). Dosage ranged from 600 to 2,400 mg/day for fengabine and 50 to 200 mg/day for TCAs. Efficacy was evaluated with the HAM-D scale. 311 subjects (154 fengabine and 157 TCAs) ended the 4-week treatment period. Considering the whole sample and mean 1AM-D scores, no significant differences emerged between the 2 treatment groups at any of the assessment periods. Because of a significant treatment × type of depression interaction, MD and MiD were analysed separately, and a different trend appeared in the 2 subgroups with TCAs behaving slightly better than fengabine in MD and fengabine performing slightly better than TCAs in MiD. Using the physician’s clinical improvement, 74% of patients under fengabine and 72% of those under TCAs were rated as improved or much improved. Side effects, particularly of the anticholinergic type were significantly more frequent in the TCAs group. Gamma-GT were more frequently altered in the fengabine group (30.4 vs. 10.5%); this increase was interpreted as a consequence of enzymatic induction. Lastly, more patients taking fengabine exhibited an increase in cholesterol values.

Twenty therapy-resistant epileptic patients entered a double-blind, randomized, two-period, cross-over trial comparing progabide (19.3-36 mg/kg/day) and placebo as add-on drugs to standard therapy. Each period lasted 6 weeks with a gradual crossover during 4 days. Five patients were dropped because of reasons unrelated to treatment. Among the 15 patients who completed the study, seven had partial, six primary generalized, and two secondary generalized epilepsies. Preexisting antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) ranging from one to three per patient (mean 2.2 AEDs/patient) were maintained unchanged during the trial. Efficacy was assessed biweekly by means of total seizure counts, counts of each seizure type, and global clinical judgment. At the same time intervals, safety was assessed by means of reports of adverse events, clinical and neurological examination, laboratory tests, and measurement of plasma concentrations of progabide and associated AEDs. According to the clinical global judgment, eight patients were considered improved during progabide treatment. Seizures were reduced in 14 of 15 patients during the progabide as compared with the placebo period. During the progabide period, the reduction of the total seizure count was 45 and 58% in two patients and 88-97% in six patients. A significant reduction of the total seizure number was observed in the progabide period as compared with the placebo period, both in the whole patient group (p less than 0.01) and in the two subgroups of patients with generalized (p less than 0.01) and partial (p less than 0.05) epilepsies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract