The quality of fit of a trans-tibial patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket may be influenced by consistency in casting, rectification or alignment. This paper quantifies, for the first time, the variations in the rectified casts between two experienced prosthetists and the variation between the rectified casts of each individual prosthetist. Prosthetists A and B observed the hand casting of a typical trans-tibial amputee. Each prosthetist was supplied with 5 previously measured duplicated plaster models. The two prosthetists rectified the supplied plaster models based on their own interpretation of basic rectification guidelines. Both prosthetists operated in isolation. The re-measured rectified plaster model data was compared with the unrectified data. The extent of rectification at each of 1800 locations per plaster model was calculated. In zones of major rectification, the mean difference between prosthetists was quantified as 2mm and the standard deviation (SD) about that mean was +/- 1mm for each prosthetist. The co-ordinates of the apex of the fibular head for the 10 modified casts indicated that the maximum variation was in the axial direction with a SD of 4.3mm for prosthetist A and a SD of 2.8mm for prosthetist B. The lengths of the 5 plaster models rectified by prosthetist A indicated a SD of 0.2mm whereas the lengths of the 5 plaster models rectified by prosthetist B indicated a SD of 2.9mm.
The quality of fit of a trans-tibial patellar tendon bearing (PTB) socket may be influenced by consistency in casting, rectification or alignment.For this study two distinctive different datacapturing concepts were tested in relation to prosthetist performance. The hands-on PTB and hands-off ICECAST compact ® concept were studied and compared for inter-and intraprosthetist consistency using a specially designed manikin stump model.A purpose designed digitiser was used to scan a selected surface area of the produced models, 5 for each concept, 10 in total. The extent of casting consistency at each of 936 locations per plaster model was calculated and the level of consistency was quantified.This study has shown that by using the manikin model there is a clear indication that the investigated hands-off concept produces more consistent results than the hands-on concept.
The objective of this study is to investigate the accuracy of the TracerCAD system in measuring a model of known dimensions and volumes. A cylindrical nylon 6.6 model was prepared. Landmarks were added to indicate proximal, distal, anterior, medial, and lateral. Four additional landmarks were added at regular intervals along the length of the cylinder with a view to calculating diameters and volumes relative to these landmarks. The model was measured using a comparator with a guaranteed accuracy of 0.01 mm and was traced using the TracerCAD system (Test 1). The test was repeated with the model rotated by 908 (Test 2), to determine whether there were any effects related to the orientation of the model in relation to the transmitter. The difference in average volume between measured results and TracerCAD scans was between 0.20% and -1.96%. Individual trace volumes varied between -0.0085% and -4.50%. In all volumes measured in Tests 1 and 2, all maximum volume percentage differences measured greater than 3%.
The TracerCAD system is one of the leading prosthetic CAD systems in the world and is increasingly used in clinics to replace traditional methods of residual limb shape capture. Accurate dimensional capture of the residuum is arguably the most important process in the production of a prosthetic socket. TracerCAD system accuracy has previously been tested on a cylindrical model but not a trans-tibial shape. Residual limbs are irregular in shape therefore it is important to assess if shape has an effect on the accuracy of data collected when using TracerCAD. The objective of this study is to investigate the accuracy of the TracerCAD system in measuring a model of a trans-tibial stump of known dimensions and volume. A model of a trans-tibial stump was produced and filled with plaster and measured using a data acquisition system with an accuracy of five micron (0.005 mm). The model was repeatedly traced using the TracerCAD system by an individual user. The mean value of measures taken by the dynamic indicator was calculated and compared to individual and mean values of TracerCAD measurement. Results showed that the TracerCAD measurement was not as consistent on the more complex trans-tibial model as for the cylindrical model.
Abstract-Investigations into the shape and volume of transtibial prosthetic sockets are complicated because of the difficulty in establishing an accurate reference grid. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) presents a possible solution to this problem. However, the reliability of MRI in defining the residual-limb/cast interface depends on the scanned image not being distorted by the materials present. We investigated the potential of MRI technology to establish the desired reference grid. Distortion from the so-called "chemical shift" may influence the MRI when certain materials are used during the casting process. These materials include plaster of paris (POP) and silicone (in the form of an interface liner). POP is commonly used to capture the shape of the residual limb. However, if the casting technique requires the use of a silicone liner, the liner is placed over the residual limb first and then the POP is applied over the liner. Experimental results indicate that the materials used do not distort or interfere with the scanned image. The object segmentation process that extracts the bone and skin from an MRI scan and enables the establishment of the required reference grid was explored. Results show that extracting the bone structure and using it as the reference grid to quantify the differences in volume and shape of the soft tissues of the residual limb is feasible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.