No abstract

The indications for neuroendoscopy are not only constantly increasing, but even the currently accepted indications are constantly being adjusted and tailored. This is also true for one of the most frequently used neuroendoscopic procedures, the endoscopic 3rd ventriculostomy (ETV) for obstructive hydrocephalus. ETV has gained popularity and widespread acceptance during the past few years, but little attention has been paid to the techniques of the procedure. After a short introduction describing the history of ETV, an overview is given of all the different techniques that have been and still are employed to open the floor of the 3rd ventricle. The spectrum of indications for ETV has been widely enlarged over the last years. Initially, the use of this procedure was restricted to patients older than 2 years, to patients with an obvious triventricular hydrocephalus, and to those with a bulging, translucent floor of the 3rd ventricle. Nowadays, indications include all kinds of obstructive hydrocephalus but also communicating forms of hydrocephalus. The results of endoscopic procedures in treating these pathologies are given under special consideration of shunt technologies. In summary, from the review of the publications since the first ETV performed by Mixter in 1923, this technique is the treatment of choice for obstructive hydrocephalus caused by different etiologies and is an alternative to cerebrospinal fluid shunt application.

Continued improvement of endoscopic techniques and instruments, together with good long-term results in endoscopically treated patients, have established this method as an alternative to microsurgical techniques and might even set a new standard for treatment.

Severe spinal spasticity has been shown to be a good indication for continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion (CIBI), but there is only limited experience with this treatment in patients with supraspinal spasticity. Eighteen patients with severe spasticity from traumatic or hypoxic brain injury were treated with CIBI. In all patients spasticity could be reduced significantly. The mean Ashworth score was reduced from 4.5 to 2.33 and the mean Spasm frequency score from 2.16 to 0.94. This reduction of spasticity led to a marked pain reduction. Nursing, perineal care and mobilization became much easier. The complication rate was low. In this series we saw one infection in the pump pocket, one epileptic seizure after a bolus application of baclofen and one spinal catheter displacement. The results are similar to those reported from series of patients with spinal spasticity and correspond to the limited experience we have so far with supraspinal spasticity patients. To prevent limb contractures CIBI should be performed as soon as the patient is in a stable clinical condition after brain injury. Further prospective clinical trials will be necessary to obtain more experience with patients suffering from supraspinal spasticity.

No abstract