One hospital sought to study the differences in using resterilizable permanent versus disposable ventilator circuits and changing the circuits on a 24-h versus a 48-h basis. Over a period of 13 months 656 condensate samples from 92 permanent and 72 disposable circuits were collected and plated by a loop dilution technique. Two samples were collected from the inspiratory limb (humidifier; tubing or nebulizer), and two were collected from the expiratory limb (tubing and trap) of each circuit. Contamination rates were higher for disposable circuits than for permanent circuits and for 48-h changes than for 24-h changes. Results of x2 testing by site indicated there was more contamination on the inspiratory and expiratory limbs each with use of disposàb1l circuits than with the use of permanent circuits. The total results (X2 analysis) showed significantly greater microbial growth with the use of disposable circuits (permanent versus disposable, P < 0.001) and extension of time to 48-h changes (24 h versus 48 h, P < 0.05). In the experience of this hospital permanent circuits proved more advantageous from the standpoint of contamination risk and cost.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.