No abstract

The morphology and the crystallization of blends of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) with polyamide-6 (PA-6), and with poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBTP), were investigated in detail by electron microscopy and by DSC. In some of the blends, the dispersed component exhibits rather small particle sizes and, followingly, a high number density of the dispersed particles which is in the order of magnitude of, or exceeds the number density of the usually nucleating heterogeneities. In these blends, the crystallization of the dispersed component proceeded in two steps, induced by different nucleating species ("fractionated crystallization"). The nuclei concentrations in the components and the specific interfacial energies of the PVDF nucleation steps were estimated. An unusual type of fractionated crystallization occurs in some cases: matrix and disperse phases crystallize completely coincident due to a specific mutual nucleating efficiency of both components. An estimation of the interracial energies involved suggests a nucleating activity of PVDF crystals for PA-6. Moreover, a rise of the crystallization temperatures of the PA-6 and PBTP matrix phases is observed that may indicate a migration of nucleating impurities during melt processing from PVDF towards the second component.

A survey is presented on the crystallization kinetics and the morphology of miscible crystalline/crystalline polymer blends. There are only few corresponding systems. In them, however, a number of strange kinetic and structural phenomena can be observed: (i) spherulitic crystallization of the components side‐by‐side, (ii) “interpenetrating crystallization,” (iii) “interlocking spherulitic crystallization,” and (iv) “interfilling crystallization.” Cocrystallization is forbidden for crystallographic reasons. The blend partners grow instead in their own lamellar stacks, and mixed lamellar stacks are a seldom and questionable exception. They crystallize also usually stepwise and not simultaneously. Upon step crystallization, the crystallization of the second component is determined by its redistribution with crystallization of the former. Those composition inhomogeneities are an independent issue that arises also with the development of the morphology in crystalline/amorphous blends, and a corresponding survey is yielded, too. The blend poly (vinylidene fluoride)/poly‐β‐hydroxybutyrate is a convenient model system as it can show all of these morphological and kinetic features after suitable thermal treatment. Some of them are demonstrated in the present publication. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 1917–1931, 2007

No abstract

No abstract

The equilibrium melting temperature, Tm,0, of poly(ferrocenyl dimethylsilane) (PFDMS) is re‐investigated using two PFDMS homopolymers and a PS‐b‐PFDMS copolymer (PS: polystyrene). The melting temperatures of samples crystallized at different crystallization temperatures, Tc, were found to depend in a nonlinear fashion on Tc. Consequently, the Hoffmann–Weeks approach fails in determining Tm,0. The more reliable Gibbs–Thomson approach results in a Tm,0 = (215 ± 11) °C for the PFDMS homopolymers, and a Tm,0 = (179 ± 5) °C for the PFDMS microphases in the lamellar PS‐b‐PFDMS diblock copolymer.magnified image

No abstract

The development of the poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) morphology in the presence of already existent poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) spherulites was studied by two‐stage solidification with two separate crystallization temperatures. PVDF formed irregular dendrites at lower temperatures and regular, banded spherulites at elevated temperatures. The transition temperature of the spherulitic morphology from dendrites to regular, banded spherulites increased with increasing PVDF content. A remarkable amount of PHB was included in the PVDF dendrites, whereas PHB was rejected into the remaining melt from the banded spherulites. When PVDF crystallized as banded spherulites, PHB could consequently crystallize only around them, if at all. In contrast, PHB crystallized with a common growth front, starting from a defined site in the interfibrillar regions of volume‐filling PVDF dendrites. It formed by itself dendritic spherulites that included a large number of PVDF spherulites. For blends with a PHB content of more than 80 wt %, for which the PVDF dendrites were not volume‐filling, PHB first formed regular spherulites. Their growth started from outside the PVDF dendrites but could later interpenetrate them, and this made their own morphology dendritic. These PHB spherulites melted stepwise because the lamellae inside the PVDF dendrites melted at a lower temperature than those from outside. This reflected the regularity of the two fractions of the lamellae because that of those inside the dendrites of PVDF was controlled by the intraspherulitic order of PVDF, whereas that from outside was only controlled by the temperature and the melt composition. The described morphologies developed without mutual nucleating efficiency of the components. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 873–882, 2003