BACKGROUND Cancer patients are considered a priority group for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination given their high risk of contracting severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, limited data exists regarding the efficacy of immunization in this population. In this study we assess the immunologic response after COVID-19 vaccination of cancer versus non-cancer population. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases were searched from March 01, 2020, through August 12, 2021. Primary endpoints were anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion rates, T-cell response, and documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after COVID-19 immunization. Data was extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Overall effects were pooled using random effects models. RESULTS This systematic review and meta-analysis included 35 original studies. Overall, 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-62) and 73% (95%CI, 64-81) of cancer patients developed anti-S IgG above the threshold level after partial and complete immunization, respectively. Patients with hematologic malignancies had a significantly lower seroconversion rate than those with solid tumors after complete immunization (65% vs 94%; P <0.0001). Compared to non-cancer controls, oncological patients were less likely to attain seroconversion after incomplete (RR 0.45 [95%CI 0.35-0.58]) and complete (RR 0.69 [95%CI 0.56-0.84]) COVID-19 immunization schemes. Cancer patients had a higher likelihood of having a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after partial (RR 3.21; 95%CI 0.35-29.04) and complete (RR 2.04; 95%CI 0.38-11.10) immunization. CONCLUSIONS Cancer patients have an impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccination compared to controls. Strategies that endorse the completion of vaccination schemes are warranted. Future studies should aim to evaluate different approaches that enhance oncological patients’ immune response.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial effect on cancer care. 1 The recent widespread availability of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is a promising strategy to prevent COVID-19associated mortality. However, previous reports have shown a high hesitancy rate to receive a COVID-19 vaccine among oncologic patients. 2,3 Because breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignant neoplasm, 4 it is imperative to evaluate the specific concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination among patients with this disease.Methods | From March 12 to March 26, 2021, any woman with breast cancer residing in Mexico who visited the social media channels of nongovernmental organizations dedicated to improving breast cancer care were invited to complete a webbased survey. To assess COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rates, participants were dichotomized into a vaccine-acceptant group (ie, willing to be vaccinated immediately) and a vaccinehesitant group (ie, prefer to wait, only if vaccine is mandatory, or refuse). Respondents who previously had been vaccinated against COVID-19 were excluded from the statistical analysis.Data analyses were performed using SPSS, version 27 (IBM Inc). Significance was defined as 2-tailed P < .05. The
Lambert-Eaton syndrome is a rare paraneoplastic disorder of the neuromuscular junction, characterized by impaired release of acetylcholine, which causes proximal muscle weakness, depressed tendon reflexes, and autonomic changes. Most cases of Lambert-Eaton syndrome present in small-cell lung carcinoma, and only a few cases have been reported in other lung subtypes. Herein, we report a case of 69 years old male patient with Lambert-Eaton syndrome as a rare association with a pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, which presented 5 months before neoplasm diagnosis. A lobectomy was auspiciously performed. A review of the literature is also presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.