Background: Multi-site stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab (SBRT+P) has demonstrated safety in advanced solid tumors (AST). However, no studies have examined the relationships between irradiated tumor response, SBRT-induced tumor gene expression, and overall survival (OS).

PurposeThe study assessed the outcomes of patients at a single institution with locally advanced primary and recurrent pelvic malignancies treated with interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT), using a modified Syed-Neblett template.Material and methodsBetween 1996 and 2010, 60 patients with primary or recurrent pelvic malignancies were treated with interstitial BT. Thirty three patients had primary malignancies with 6.1% being stage I, 33.3% stage II, 45.5% stage III, and 15.2% stage IV; the remaining 27 patients were recurrent malignancies. Fifty four patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as part of their treatment course. The median EBRT, BT, and EBRT + BT doses were 45 Gy, 20 Gy, and 65 Gy, respectively. Thirty eight patients received concurrent chemotherapy with EBRT. Complete response (CR) was defined by absence of clinical and radiographic disease on first follow-up. Toxicity was graded as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.ResultsThe median follow-up was 37 months (4-234 months) and initial CR was achieved in 91%. For primary cancers at diagnosis, 5-year local control (LC), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), 5-year overall survival (OS) were 65%, 64%, and 42% respectively. For recurrent cancers at diagnosis, 5-year LC, 5-year PFS, and 5-year OS were 80%, 51%, and 37%, respectively. There was a significant difference in both OS and PFS among different tumor sites (p < 0.05), with vaginal cancers having the best 5-year OS (55%) and PFS (84%). There was a total of 1 acute toxicity ≥ grade 3, 6 late grade 3 toxicities, and late grade 4 toxicity.ConclusionsOur series suggests that interstitial BT using a modified Syed-Neblett template is a safe and effective treatment for primary or recurrent pelvic malignancies. This technique allowed effective LC and 97% of patients had preservation of both bladder and rectal function.

Background and ObjectivesLymph node metastases (LNM) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the trunk and extremity are rare but are associated with worse survival. Established risk factors for LNM in this group are based on small institutional retrospective reviews. This study identifies the risk factors associated with LNM in otherwise non-metastatic trunk/extremity STS patients using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and sought out to delineate a high-risk group that may be considered for pathologic nodal evaluation.MethodsThe files of 10,731 patients with STS of the trunk/extremity without distant metastasis from 2004 - 2015 were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant therapy and a lack of pathologic nodal evaluation. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate variables associated with LNM.ResultsOf the total of 10,731 patients, 223 (2.1%) had LNM. On multivariable analysis, LNM was associated with Grade 3 tumors (odds ratio (OR) 15.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.36 - 38.04, p < 0.001) and clear cell/angiosarcoma/rhabdomyosarcoma/epithelioid (CARE) histology (OR 4.72, 95% CI 3.35 - 6.66, p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR 5.86, 95% CI 3.33 - 10.31, p < 0.001, and bone invasion (BI) (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.32 - 5.61, p = 0.006). Patients with Grade 3 CARE tumors (n = 402) had an 11.9% risk of LNM vs. 1.7% of adults without all these characteristics (p < 0.001). Patients with Grade 3 CARE tumors and either LVI or BI (n = 36) had a 33.3% risk of LNM.ConclusionsHigh-grade and CARE histology are associated with LNM in STS. Adult patients with both features have an overall 11.9% risk of LNM and may be considered for pathologic LN assessment, particularly with the presence of LVI or BI.

6.21 vs. 13.3 months, log-rank pZ0.0036; HRZ2.57, pZ0.005) compared to patients with high-RS. High RS values correlated with transcriptional activation of innate and adaptive immune signatures in biopsies from irradiated tumors (nZ35). Conclusions: The RS predicts local irradiated tumor control and OS for patients treated with combined SBRT and pembro. Transcriptional analysis from a subset of patients is concordant with immune activation in high RS tumors. The RS may allow clinicians to utilize imaging at the time of pretreatment CT to predict which patients will not benefit from combined therapy and avoid associated toxicity.

While it is well-established that hypoxia is a major factor that affects clinical outcomes in cervical cancer, widespread usage of clinically available methods to detect and evaluate hypoxia during the course of treatment have not been established. This review compares these methods, summarizes their strengths and weaknesses, and assesses the pathways for their useful employment to alter clinical practice. We conducted a search on PubMed for literature pertaining to imaging hypoxic cervical cancer, and implemented keywords related to oxygen measurement tools to improve the relevance of the search results. Oxygenation level-dependent applications of MRI have demonstrated hypoxia-induced radioresistance, and changes in cervix tumor oxygenation from hyperoxic therapy. The hypoxic areas within tumors can be indirectly identified in dynamic contrast-enhanced images, where they generally display low signal enhancement, and diffusion-weighted images, which demonstrates areas of restricted diffusion (which correlates with hypoxia). Positron emmision tomography, used independently and with other imaging modalities, has demonstrated utility in imaging hypoxia through tracers specific for low oxygen levels, like Cu-ATSM tracers and nitroimidazoles. Detecting hypoxia in the tumors of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer via medical imaging and non-imaging tools like electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry can be utilized clinically, such as for guiding radiation and post-treatment surveillance, for a more personalized approach to treatment. The merits of these methods warrant further investigation via comparative effectiveness research and large clinical trials into their clinical applications.