Controlled heart donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCD) is well established internationally with good outcomes and could be adopted in the United States to increase heart supply if ethical and logistical challenges are comprehensively addressed. The most effective and resource‐efficient method for mitigating warm ischemia after circulatory arrest is normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in situ. This strategy requires restarting circulation after declaration of death according to circulatory criteria, which appears to challenge the legal circulatory death definition requiring irreversible cessation. Permanent cessation for life‐saving efforts must be achieved to assuage this concern and ligating principal vessels maintains no blood flow to the brain, which ensures natural progression to cessation of brain function. This practice—standard in some countries—raises unique concerns about prioritizing life‐saving efforts, informed authorization from decision‐makers, and the clinician's role in the patient's death. To preserve public trust, medical integrity, and respect for the donor, the donation conversation must not take place until after an un‐coerced decision to withdraw life‐sustaining treatment made in accordance with the patient's treatment goals. The decision‐maker(s) must understand cDCD procedure well enough to provide genuine authorization and the preservation/procurement teams must be kept separate from the clinical care team.
We previously reported that ATP release from 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells could be stimulated either by activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) or by hypotonic stress. Cheema et al. (Cheema TA, Ward CE, Fisher SK. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 315: 755-763, 2005) have demonstrated that thrombin activation of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) in 1321N1 cells and primary astrocytes acts synergistically with hypotonic stress to gate the opening of volume-sensitive organic osmolyte and anion channels (VSOAC) and that hypertonic stress strongly inhibits PAR1 gating of VSOAC. We tested the hypothesis that a VSOAC-type permeability might comprise a GPCR-regulated pathway for ATP export by determining whether PAR1-sensitive ATP release from 1321N1 cells is similarly potentiated by hypotonicity but suppressed by hypertonic conditions. Strong hypotonic stress by itself elicited ATP release and positively modulated the response to thrombin. Thrombin-dependent ATP release was also potentiated by mild hypotonic stress that by itself did not stimulate ATP export. Notably, PAR1-sensitive ATP export was greatly inhibited in hypertonic medium. Neither the potency nor efficacy of thrombin as an activator of proximal PAR1 signaling was affected by hypotonicity or hypertonicity. 1,9-Dideoxyforskolin and carbenoxolone similarly attenuated PAR1-dependent ATP release and suppressed the PAR1-independent ATP elicited by strong hypotonic stress. Probenecid attenuated PAR1-stimulated ATP release under isotonic but not mild hypotonic conditions and had no effect on PAR1-independent release stimulated by strong hypotonicity. PAR1-dependent ATP export under all osmotic conditions required concurrent signaling by Ca(2+) mobilization and Rho-GTPase activation. In contrast, PAR1-independent ATP release triggered by strong hypotonicity required neither of these intracellular signals. Thus, we provide the new finding that GPCR-regulated ATP release from 1321N1 astrocytoma cells is remarkably sensitive to both positive and negative modulation by extracellular osmolarity. This supports a model wherein GPCR stimulation and osmotic stress converge on an ATP release pathway in astrocytes that exhibits several features of VSOAC-type channels.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.