Key PointsQuestionIs transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) noninferior to surgical aortic valve replacement (surgery) in patients aged 70 years or older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and moderately increased operative risk?FindingsIn this randomized clinical trial that included 913 patients at moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity, all-cause mortality at 1 year was 4.6% with TAVI vs 6.6% with surgery, a difference that met the prespecified noninferiority margin of 5%.MeaningAmong patients aged 70 years or older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and moderately increased operative risk, treatment with TAVI was noninferior to surgery with respect to all-cause mortality at 1 year.

Unlike general cardiothoracic surgery, blood transfusion had no effect on all-cause mortality, whereas a greater administration of platelets was observed to be associated with higher adjusted 1-year mortality. Transfusion rates were not significantly influenced by pretransplant diagnoses. Interestingly, lung function at 3 and 6 months was similar for patients who received more blood product transfusion.

All blood products administration regardless of amount transfused did not appear to affect early rejection outcomes or forced expiratory volume in 1 second expressed as percentage of forced vital capacity at 3 and 6 months. Use of RBC and FFP had no effect on survival. However, greater platelet usage appeared to adversely affect early but not late mortality.

The development of more than mild AI is rare in HVAD patients at our center. When encountered, it is more common with a closed AoV. Dilation of the aortic annulus, and root dilation in those with mild or more AI, is seen with HVAD support over time.

Most surgeons perform coronary bypass surgery with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass, which inflicts a massive systemic inflammatory response to the body leading to adverse clinical outcome. In an attempt to make CABG less invasive, interest have been diverted to the off pump technique.The current review attempts to bring an insight onto the last ten years knowledge on the off-pump impact in end organ function, with an aim to draw some clear conclusions in order to allow practitioners to reflect on the subject.