Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have gained great interest for rapid deployment in both civil and military applications. UAV communication has its own distinctive channel characteristics compared with widely used cellular and satellite systems. Thus, accurate channel characterization is crucial for the performance optimization and design of efficient UAV communication systems. However, several challenges exist in UAV channel modeling. For example, propagation characteristics of UAV channels are still less explored for spatial and temporal variations in non-stationary channels. Also, airframe shadowing has not yet been investigated for small size rotary UAVs. This paper provides an extensive survey on the measurement campaigns launched for UAV channel modeling using low altitude platforms and discusses various channel characterization efforts. We also review the contemporary perspective of UAV channel modeling approaches and outline some future research challenges in this domain.

The use of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) as the aerial base stations can provide wireless communication services in the form of UAV-based small cells (USCs). Thus, the major design challenge that needs to be addressed is the coverage maximization of such USCs in the presence of co-channel interference generated by multiple UAVs operating within a specific target area. Consequently, the efficient deployment strategy is imperative for USCs while optimizing the coverage area performance to compensate for the impact of interference. To this end, this paper presents a coordinated multi-UAV strategy in two scenarios. In the first scenario, symmetric placement of UAVs is assumed at a common optimal altitude and transmit power. In the second scenario, asymmetric deployment of UAVs with different altitudes and transmit powers is assumed. Then, the coverage area performance is investigated as a function of the separation distance between UAVs that are deployed in a certain geographical area to satisfy a target signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the cell boundary. Finally, the system-level performance of a boundary user is studied in terms of the coverage probability. The numerical results unveil that the SINR threshold, the separation distance, and the number of UAVs and their formations should be carefully selected to achieve the maximum coverage area inside and to reduce the unnecessary expansion outside the target area. Thus, this paper provides important design guidelines for the deployment of multiple UAVs in the presence of co-channel interference. INDEX TERMS Coverage area performance, interference management, UAV-based small cells, UAV communications, UAV separation distance. WEI FENG (S'06-M'10-SM'19) received the B.S. and Ph.D. degrees (Hons.

Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

No abstract

No abstract

Future wireless networks will be required to provide more wireless services at higher data rates and with global coverage. However, existing homogeneous wireless networks, such as cellular and satellite networks, may not be able to meet such requirements individually, especially in remote terrain, including seas and mountains. One possible solution is to use diversified wireless networks that can exploit the inter-connectivity between satellites, aerial base stations (BSs), and terrestrial BSs over inter-connected space, ground, and aerial networks. Hence, enabling wireless communication in one integrated network has attracted both the industry and the research fraternities. In this work, we provide a comprehensive survey of the most recent work on hybrid satellite–terrestrial networks (HSTNs), focusing on system architecture, performance analysis, design optimization, and secure communication schemes for different cooperative and cognitive HSTN network architectures. Different key technologies are compared. Based on this comparison, several open issues for future research are discussed.

No abstract