Background: With a prevalence of 170 000 adults in the US alone, meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors. The management of skull base meningiomas is challenging due to their complexity and proximity to crucial nearby structures. The identification of oncogenic mutations has provided further insights into the tumorigenesis of meningioma and the possibility of targeted therapy. This study aimed to further investigate the association of mutational profiles with anatomical distribution, histological subtype, WHO grade, and recurrence in patients with meningioma. Methods: Tissue samples were collected from 71 patients diagnosed with meningioma from 2008 to 2016. A total of 51 cases were skull based. Samples were subjected to targeted sequencing using a next generation customized cancer gene panel (n = 66 genes analyzed). Results: We detected genomic alterations (GAs) in 68 tumors, averaging 1.56 ± 1.07 genomic alterations (GAs) per sample. NF2 was the most frequently altered gene (36/71 cases). Interestingly, we identified a number of mutations in non-NF2 genes, including a hotspot TERTp c.−124: G > A mutation that may be related to poor prognosis and FGFR3 mutations that may represent biomarkers of a favorable prognosis as reported in other cancers. Conclusions: We demonstrate that comprehensive genomic profiling in our population can reveal a potential new prognostic biomarkers of skull base meningioma. These mutations can enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making. Among our findings were the identification of a TERTp mutation and the first report of FGFR3 mutations that may represent biomarkers for the identification of skull base meningioma patients with a favorable prognosis.
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Multiple skull fractures, including bilateral parietal skull fractures (BPSFs) in infants are considered to be suspicious for abusive head trauma (AHT). The aim of this report is to describe a series of BPSF cases in infants which occurred due to accidental falls. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We searched our neuroradiology database for BPSF in infants (<1 year old) diagnosed between 2006 and 2019; we reviewed initial presentation, mechanisms of injury, clinical course, head imaging, skeletal survey X-rays, ophthalmology, social work and child abuse physicians (CAP) assessments, and long-term follow-up. “Confirmed accidental BPSF” were strictly defined as having negative skeletal survey and ophthalmology evaluation and a CAP conclusion of accidental injury. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twelve cases of BPSF were found; 3 were confirmed to be accidental, with a mean age at presentation of 3 months. Two infants had single-impact falls, and 1 had a compression injury; all 3 had small intracranial hemorrhages. None had bruises or other injuries, and all remained clinically well. A literature search found 10 similar cases and further biomechanical evidence that these fractures can occur from accidental falls. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> While AHT should be kept in the differential diagnosis whenever BPSFs are seen, these injuries can occur as a result of accidental falls.
Introduction:Numerical classification systems for the internal carotid artery (ICA) are available, but modifications have added confusion to the numerical systems. Furthermore, previous classifications may not be applicable uniformly to microsurgical and endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinically useful classification system.Materials and Methods:We performed cadaver dissections of the ICA in 5 heads (10 sides) and evaluated 648 internal carotid arteries with computed tomography angiography. We identified specific anatomic landmarks to define the beginning and end of each ICA segment.Results:The ICA was classified into eight segments based on the cadaver and imaging findings: (1) Cervical segment; (2) cochlear segment (ascending segment of the ICA in the temporal bone) (relation of the start of this segment to the base of the styloid process: Above, 425 sides [80%]; below, 2 sides [0.4%]; at same level, 107 sides [20%]; P < 0.0001) (relation of cochlea to ICA: Posterior, 501 sides [85%]; posteromedial, 84 sides [14%]; P < 0.0001); (3) petrous segment (horizontal segment of ICA in the temporal bone) starting at the crossing of the eustachian tube superolateral to the ICA turn in all 10 samples; (4) Gasserian-Clival segment (ascending segment of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the petrolingual ligament (PLL) (relation to vidian canal on imaging: At same level, 360 sides [63%]; below, 154 sides [27%]; above, 53 sides [9%]; P < 0.0001); in this segment, the ICA projected medially toward the clivus in 275 sides (52%) or parallel to the clivus with no deviation in 256 sides (48%; P < 0.0001); (5) sellar segment (medial loop of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the takeoff of the meningeal hypophyseal trunk (ICA was medial into the sella in 271 cases [46%], lateral without touching the sella in 127 cases [23%], and abutting the sella in 182 cases [31%]; P < 0.0001); (6) sphenoid segment (lateral loop of ICA within the cavernous sinus) starting at the crossing of the fourth cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the cavernous ICA and located directly lateral to the sphenoid sinus; (7) ring segment (ICA between the 2 dural rings) starting at the crossing of the third cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the ICA; (8) cisternal segment starting at the distal dural ring.Conclusions:The classification may be applied uniformly to all skull base surgical approaches including lateral microsurgical and ventral endoscopic approaches, obviating the need for 2 separate classification systems. The classification allows extrapolation of relevant clinical information because each named segment may indicate potential surgical risk to specific structures.
BACKGROUND: TRK fusions are detected in less than 3% of CNS tumors. Given their rarity, there are limited data on the clinical course of these patients. METHODS: We contacted 166 oncology centers worldwide to retrieve data on patients with TRK fusion-driven CNS tumors. Data extracted included demographics, histopathology, NTRK gene fusion, treatment modalities and outcomes. Patients less than 18 years of age at diagnosis were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-three pediatric patients with TRK fusion-driven primary CNS tumors were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 2.4 years (range 0.0–17.8) and 60.2 % were male. NTRK2 gene fusions were found in 37 patients (50.7%), NTRK1 and NTRK3 aberrations were detected in 19 (26.0%) and 17 (23.3%), respectively. Tumor types included 38 high-grade gliomas (HGG; 52.1%), 20 low-grade gliomas (LGG; 27.4%), 4 embryonal tumors (5.5%) and 11 others (15.1%). Median follow-up was 46.5 months (range 3-226). During the course of their disease, a total of 62 (84.9%) patients underwent surgery with a treatment intent, 50 (68.5%) patients received chemotherapy, 35 (47.9%) patients received radiation therapy, while 34 (46.6%) patients received NTRK inhibitors (3 as first line treatment). Twenty-four (32.9%) had no progression including 9 LGG (45%) and 9 HGG (23.6%). At last follow-up, only one (5.6%-18 evaluable) patient with LGG died compared to 11 with HGG (35.5%-31 evaluable). For LGG the median progression-free survival (PFS) after the first line of treatment was 17 months (95% CI: 0.0-35.5) and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. For patients with HGG the median PFS was 30 months (95% CI: 11.9-48.1) and median OS was 182 months (95% CI 20.2-343.8). CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest cohort of pediatric patients with TRK fusion-driven primary CNS tumors. These results will help us to better understand clinical evolution and compare outcomes with ongoing clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION:The management of skull base meningiomas is challenging due to their complexity and proximity to crucial nearby structures. The identification of oncogenic mutations has provided further insights into the tumorigenesis of meningioma and the possibility of targeted therapy.METHODS:Tissue samples were collected from 71 patients diagnosed with meningioma from 2008 to 2016. Tissues were treated and archived as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE). Samples were subjected to targeted sequencing using a customized gene panel.RESULTS:The study cohort comprised 71 patients with histologically proven meningioma (grades I, II, and III) .The median patient age was 54.8 years (range 27-96 years). Most of the patients were female (51/71, 72.82%), while 19/71 (27.14%) were male. 56/71 patients had grade I (80.0%), 13/71 (18.57%) had grade II and 1/71 (1.428%) had grade III tumors. A total of 51/71 of the tumors were found in the skull base (72.82%). 22/71 (31.42%) of the tumors were meningothelial, 6/71 (8.57%) were atypical, 6/71 (8.57%) were transitional, 3/71 (4.28) were secretory, and 2/71 (2.86%) were chordoid. We detected an average of 1.56 ± 1.07 genomic alterations (GAs) per patient. the most common mutations were in NF2 (52/71), PIK3CA (22/71), FGFR3 (13/71), SMO (11/71) and AKT1 (10/71), with Tertp (1/71) mutations being the least frequent. The NF2-positive tumors were predominantly of grade I 43/52 (82.69%) with lower rates of recurrence (7/52, 13.41%) in tumors harboring NF2 mutations compared to tumor harboring non-NF2 mutations (8/18, 44.44%). Single FGFR3 mutations reported in three patients, all had WHO grade I tumors, with no recurrence in our cohort.CONCLUSIONS:This cohort focusing skull base meningiomas, highlights a range of mutations outside the known cancer driver NF2 that may be linked to meningioma prognosis. Among our findings were the identification of a rare TERTp mutation and the first report of FGFR3 mutations that may represent biomarkers for the identification of skull base meningioma patients with a favorable prognosis. Taken together, these findings highlight how genetic profiling can guide optimal treatment strategies, prognostic prediction, and patient management for skull meningioma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.