Aim: Although malpractice has been on the agenda in various fields of medicine in recent years, the literature data on this subject is still insufficient, especially in the field of mental health. In the literature review, it has been determined that there is a need for a detailed analysis of the publications on psychiatric malpractice in order to guide the researchers in the next process and to examine the studies done so far in a holistic manner. This study aims to analyze the publications on psychiatric malpractices so far. Material and Methods: Publications on psychiatric malpractice published between 1980-2022 were analyzed using bibliometric methods. The data of the publications were accessed from the Web of Science database, and in the first stage of the research, the numerical data of the researches in this field were examined with performance analyzes. In the second stage, visual network maps were created using the Vosviewer package program. Results: As a result of the search, a total of 426 publications and 8,901 citation were found. The field with the highest number of publications is Psychiatry with 219 publications, and the authors with the highest number of publications in this field are S.C.Charles with 11 publications and T.G.Gutheil with 10 publications. The institution with the largest number of publications is Harvard University with 46 publications. The most common type of publication is articles and their total number is 312. It has been determined that the journal with the highest number of publications in this field is the Journal Of The American Academy Of Psychiatry And The Law with 35 publications. It has been determined that USA has the highest number of publications with 279 publications. Conclusion: This comprehensive bibliometric analysis study examined the studies on malpractice in the field of psychiatry, and as far as we know, it is the first bibliometric analysis in the field of psychiatric malpractice. It is thought that our study will guide researchers interested in this field by providing a holistic perspective on the characteristics of the publications made so far in the field of malpractice in psychiatry.
Aim: We aimed to examine the frequency of plans to practice medicine abroad in medical school students and the related variables, in relation to the recently increasing brain drain in physicians in our country. Material and Method: A total of 82 volunteer students in the 5th and 6th grades were included in the study. Our study is a descriptive and cross-sectional study. A questionnaire was directed to the participants about sociodemographic data, attitudes towards the medical profession, the reasons that make it difficult to practice medicine in our country, the idea of working abroad, and the attractive features of abroad opportunities for students. In addition, the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-Bref) to measure the quality of life of the students and the Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14) to measure the stress level were applied. The data were analyzed in SPSS (21.0) program. Results: 56% Of the participants were female (n=46), 44% (n=39) were male, and the mean age was 24.07 ±1.65. Majority of the students (94%, n=77) stated that they thought of doing medicine abroad, and nearly half of them (46%, n=38) stated that they were determined on this issue. The answers given by the students to the question why they preferred medical school were as follows: Job guarantee (79%), income comfort (77%) and prestige (70%). Majority of the participants stated that they felt regret from time to time for choosing medical school (58.5%, n=48) and 45% (n=37) stated that they thought of leaving medical school in the past. The following answers were frequently given to the question of the most important reasons that make it difficult to practice the profession of medicine in our country: Heavy working conditions and long working hours (90%), verbal/physical violence against physicians (87%), mobbing and pressure applied by seniors/administrators in the workplace. (67%). The countries respondents considered to immigrate frequently were: Germany, UK and USA. The mean PSS-14 score of the participants was found to be 1.98±0.49, and there was no significant difference between those who thought to practice medicine abroad and those who did not. In the Pearson correlation test, it was determined that there was a significant and negative correlation between the WHOQOL-Bref and PSS-14 scores (r=-0.620, p
Amaç Psikiyatri polikliniğimize başvuran hasta ve onların yakınlarında bilişsel davranışçı terapi ile ilgili temel bilgi düzeyleri ve tutumlarının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem Mersin Üniversitesi Hastanesi Psikiyatri Polikliniği’ne Ağustos 2021-Kasım 2021 tarihileri arasında başvuran 110 hasta ve hasta yakınına 24 soruluk bir anket uygulanmıştır. Bulgular Katılımcıların %52,7’si kadın, %47,3’ü erkekti, yaş ortalaması 38,1 ± 14 idi. Katılımcıların % 48,2’si daha önce bilişsel davranışçı terapiyi hiç duymamıştı. Bilişsel davranışçı terapi kullanım alanları hakkında katılımcıların çoğu (%65,5) depresyon yanıtını vermiştir. Katılımcıların %48,2’u bilişsel davranışçı terapi ve ilaç tedavisinin birlikte kullanımının daha etkili olduğunu, %62,7’si bilişsel davranışçı terapi ve ilaç tedavisinin birlikte kullanımının daha uzun etki süresi ile ilişkili olduğunu belirtmiştir. Katılımcıların %55,5’i ruhsal bir hastalık varlığında bilişsel davranışçı terapi ve farmakoterapinin her ikisini birden almayı tercih ettiğini bildirmiştir. Sonuç Bilişsel davranışçı terapi hakkında psikiyatri hastalarının ve genel toplumun bilgi düzeyinin yetersiz olduğu düşünülmesine rağmen bu çalışmadaki katılımcıların çoğu bilişsel davranışçı terapi ve farmakoterapinin birlikte kullanıldığında daha etkili ve daha uzun süreli bir iyileşme sağlayacağını düşünmüş, ruhsal bozukluk durumunda her iki tedavinin birden kullanılmasını tercih edeceğini belirtmiştir. Hastalara tedavi seçenekleri arasında fırsat eşitliğinin sağlanması açısından, konuyla ilgili eğitimlerin ruh sağlığı çalışanlarına temel eğitim olarak sunulmasına, uygulama önündeki engeller ile mücadeleye, sağlık çalışanlarının ve ilgili birimlerin, toplumda bilişsel davranışçı terapi hakkında farkındalığı artırmaya yönelik bilgilendirici faaliyetlerinin arttırılmasına ihtiyaç duyulduğu anlaşılmaktadır.
Ağır ruhsal hastalıklarda toplumsal damgalama sık karşılaşılan bir durum olup damgalamanın içselleştirilmesi bireylerin psikolojik iyilik halini, tedavi uyum ve seyrini etkileyen bir durum olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu nedenle damgalanma ile ilişkili faktörleri ortaya koymak önemlidir. Bu araştırmadaki amacımız şizoaffektif bozuklukta dini başa çıkmanın içselleştirilmiş damgalanma ile olan ilişkisini ortaya koymaktır. Toplum ruh sağlığı merkezi tarafından ayaktan takip edilen ve araştırmaya dahil edilme kriterlerini karşılayan şizoaffektif bozukluk hastalarında Dini Başa Çıkma Ölçeği ve Ruhsal Hastalıklarda İçselleştirilmiş Damgalanma Ölçeği (RHİDO) uygulanmış ve elde edilen sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Pozitif dini başa çıkma ile içselleştirilmiş damgalanma toplam skoru, yabancılaşma ve kalıp yargıların onaylanması alt boyutu arasında anlamlı ve negatif bir korelasyon saptanmıştır. Negatif dini başa çıkma ile içselleştirilmiş damgalanma ölçeği toplam skoru, yabancılaşma, kalıp yargıların onaylanması ve algılanan ayrımcılık alt boyutları arasında anlamlı ve pozitif bir korelasyon saptanmıştır. Ayrıca negatif ve pozitif dini başa çıkma arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve güçlü bir negatif korelasyon saptanmıştır. İçselleştirilmiş damgalanmanın ilişkili olduğu faktörlerden olumlu veya olumsuz dini başa çıkma tutumlarının tedavi sürecinde ele alınması, hasta ile görüşmede bu tutumların saptanması, bunların içselleştirilmiş damgalanmaya etkisinin araştırılması, psikoterapötik müdahalelerin parçası olarak tedavi sürecine katkıda bulunabilir.
Aims: Functional dyspepsia is a common disorder characterized by persistent or recurrent upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms without underlying disease or structural abnormalities that can have a significant impact on an individual's overall quality of life. Studies in the literature indicate that anxiety also plays an important role in the etiology of functional dyspepsia. Early diagnosis and treatment of the underlying anxiety disorder are important to relieve dyspeptic symptoms. In this study, the aim was to examine the studies related to functional dyspepsia and anxiety using the bibliometric method. Methods: Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science database was used to search for articles and reviews on functional dyspepsia and anxiety between 1980 and 2022. VOSviewer, Tableau, and IBM SPSS Statistics were used for bibliometric network visualization and statistical analyses. A regression analysis using a nonlinear exponential model was used to forecast the number of publications in the next years. Keyword network visualization maps were used to identify recent trends and relationships. Results: The Web of Science database included 560 articles and reviews about functional dyspepsia and anxiety between 1991 and 2023, with the top 5 research areas being Gastroenterology, Clinical Neurology, Neurosciences, Psychiatry, and General Internal Medicine. The collaborative clustering network map shows four distinct clusters based on total link strength scores, and the correlation between Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the number of studies published suggests that countries with higher GDP tend to publish more studies. Since 2015, the amount of published materials on the topic has dramatically increased and is continuing to rise. Conclusion: There has been an upward trend in publications about the relationship between functional dyspepsia and anxiety since the 2010s, with the top ten countries with the greatest number of publications being mostly wealthy nations. The most cited journal on the topic was the American Journal of Gastroenterology, with 1441 total citations. Our findings suggest that this is a rapidly evolving field with a broad range of research topics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.