Background Racist interactions in clinical practice remain a pervasive reality for Black healthcare providers. Objective We sought to provide supervisors with guidance to inform their actions when confronting racism in daily clinical practice. Methods We conducted in 2021 an empirical study in which experienced supervisors responded to seven short, videotaped interactions between 1) a simulated participant (SP) and different clinicians-in-training; 2) the trainees and their respective supervisors; and 3) the trainees and their supervisors together with the SP. The clinical exchanges exemplified different types of racist (entrenching)or antiracist (uprooting) behaviors. After viewing each clip, participants wrote their reflections confidentially before joining together for a structured debriefing. For our qualitative approach to the data we used thematic analysis. Results Based on the input of 52 participants recruited into five two-hour-long sessions, we categorized the behaviors of supervisors facing anti-Black racial injuries involving learners under their oversight. We organized supervisor behaviors into five interlocking domains, each with a range of possible responses: 1) Gradation: from conciliatory to confrontational; 2) Explicitness: from avoiding to naming; 3) Ownership: from individual to shared; 4) Involvement: from excusing to including; and 5) Stance: from protective to paternalistic. Conclusions Our qualitative findings provide a rubric for supervisors to engage in reflective practice and for medical educators to inform faculty development to fight anti-Black racism in clinical practice. In addition, they can serve as a framework for facilitated discussion among healthcare providers who may have experienced or witnessed anti-Black racist interactions.
IntroductionRacist interactions in clinical practice remain a pervasive reality for Black healthcare providers. Supervisors charged with the oversight, protection, and support of their racially minoritized trainees are often inconsistent in their approach and have limited guidance to inform their actions. MethodsWe designed an empirical study in which experienced supervisors responded to seven short, videotaped interactions between 1) a simulated participant (SP) and different clinicians-in-training; 2) the trainees and their respective supervisors; and 3) the trainees and their supervisors together with the SP. The clinical exchanges exemplified different types of racist (entrenching) or antiracist (uprooting) behaviors. After viewing each clip, participants wrote their reflections confidentially before joining together in a structured debriefing. We analyzed the corpus of free-text entries and debriefing transcripts using a thematic-phenomenological qualitative approach. ResultsBased on the input of 52 participants recruited into five two-hour-long sessions, we developed a behavioral typology for supervisors facing anti-Black racial injuries involving learners under their oversight. We organized supervisor behaviors into five interlocking domains, each with a range of possible responses: 1) Gradation: from conciliatory to confrontational; 2) Explicitness: from eliding to naming; 3) Ownership: from individual to shared; 4) Involvement: from deferred (excusing) to cotemporaneous (including); and 5) Stance: from protective to paternalistic. DiscussionA behavioral typology can serve as a rubric for supervisors to engage in reflective practice and for medical educators to inform faculty development initiatives to fight anti-Black racism in clinical practice. In addition, the typology can serve as a framework for facilitated discussion among healthcare providers who may have experienced or witnessed anti-Black racist interactions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.