Compared with indices including weight, the simpler height-based ratio (excluding weight and BSA calculations) yields satisfactory results for evaluating the risk of natural complications in patients with TAAA.

No abstract

Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is an increasingly recognized condition that is often diagnosed incidentally. This review discusses ten of the most relevant epidemiological and clinical secrets of this disease; (1) the difference in pathogenesis between ascending and descending TAAs. TAAs at these two sites act as different diseases, which is related to the different embryologic origins of the ascending and descending aorta. (2) The familial pattern and genetics of thoracic aneurysms. Syndromic TAAs only explain 5% of the pattern of inheritance. (3) The effect of female sex on TAA growth and outcome. Females have been found to have worse outcomes compared to males. (4) Guilt by Association. TAAs are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms, intracranial aneurysms, bicuspid aortic valve, and inflammatory disorders. (5) Natural history of TAAs. Important findings have been made regarding the expansion rate (in relation to familial pattern, location and size), and also regarding the risk of rupture or dissection. (6) The aortic size paradox. Size only is not a sufficient predictor of risk of dissection. (7) Biomarker void. Although many serum biomarkers have been studied, imaging remains the only reliable method for diagnosis and follow-up. (8) Indications for repair. Decisions are made depending on symptoms, location, size, and familial patterns. (9) Types of repair. Both open and endovascular repair options are available for certain TAAs. (10) Medical treatment. The efficacy of prescribing beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers remains dubious.

No abstract

Objective: The risk of rupture and dissection in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms increases as the aortic diameter exceeds 5 cm. This study evaluates the clinical effectiveness of a specific algorithm based on size and symptoms for preemptive surgery to prevent complications.

Background: Cardiovascular complications account for a significant proportion of the shortened lifespan of Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients, with aortic dissection being the most dreadful complication. The aortic root dilates initially in MFS patients, and given its important hemodynamic role, this can lead to aortic regurgitation and poses a substantial risk of aortic dissection. This study seeks to evaluate the natural history of aortic root aneurysms in MFS patients, with a focus on growth rates and correlation of root diameter with the risk of developing aortic complications.Methods: Seventy-eight patients confirmed to have MFS and aortic root dilatation were retrospectively reviewed, and their aortic root diameters serially analyzed. Annual growth rate estimates and yearly rates of adverse events were computed and correlated with aortic diameter. Results:The mean annual growth rate of the aortic root was estimated to be 0.26±0.05 cm/year (range 0.13 to 0.35 cm). Larger aneurysms grew faster, reaching up to 0.46 cm/year for aneurysms >6 cm. Mean age at onset of aortic dissection was 36±4 years. Annual rates of adverse events (rupture, dissection and death) were obtained using a logistic regression model at sizes 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 and 6 cm. A sharp increase of 23% in the probability of the risk of complications at diameters 5.5 to 6 cm was recognized.Conclusions: Aortic root aneurysms in MFS patients tend to have a faster expansion rate compared to non-MFS individuals, with aortic root diameter having a significant impact on the yearly risk of developing aortic complications.

No abstract

The use of blood transfusion in cardiac surgery varies widely. The beneficial effects of blood products are offset by an increase in morbidity and mortality. Despite multiple studies showing an association between blood product exposure and adverse short- and long-term events, it is difficult to determine causality. Nevertheless, the implication is sufficient to warrant the search for alternative strategies to reduce the use of blood products while providing a standard of care that optimizes postoperative outcomes. Aortic surgery, in particular, is associated with an increased risk of bleeding requiring a blood transfusion. There is a paucity of evidence within aortic surgery regarding the deleterious effects of blood products. Here, we review the current evidence regarding patient outcomes after blood transfusion in cardiac surgery, with special emphasis on aortic surgery.