We performed this study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) to coronary angiography (CA) in detecting coronary total occlusion (CTO) lesion characteristics. Moreover, we analyzed the association between these characteristics and the risk of revascularization failure. Fifty patients with confirmed CTO diagnosis were tried for revascularization using the antegrade (all 50) or retrograde (in failed nine antegrade interventions) approaches. Each patient underwent CA and MSCT before the intervention and data from both modalities were compared using the SPSS software. Successful revascularization occurred in 36 (72%) and 6 (66.7%) patients of the antegrade and retrograde groups, respectively. Compared to CA, MSCT exhibited high sensitivity in detecting CTO segment calcification (100%), size of the affected vessel (100%, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82), distal filling of the affected segment (97.7%) and side-branching at the CTO segment (93.3%). However, it had lower sensitivity in detecting collaterals (75%) and the length of the affected segment (87.5%, AUC = 0.77). According to MSCT data, increased occlusion length > 18 mm (p = 0.01), atherosclerotic vessel wall (p = 0.02), small distal vessel size ≤ 2.75 mm (p = 0.002), proximal side-branching (p = 0.01) and calcification of the proximal cap (p = 0.007) or distal stump (p = 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of revascularization failure. MSCT exhibited high sensitivity in identifying several CTO lesion characteristics, such as lesional calcification and size of the affected vessel. However, further research is needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this modality and define the predictors of revascularization failure in CTO patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.