Plants use diverse mechanisms influenced by vast regulatory networks of indefinite scale to adapt to their environment. These regulatory networks have an unknown potential for epistasis between genes within and across networks. To test for epistasis within an adaptive trait genetic network, we generated and tested 47 double mutant combinations for 20 transcription factors, which all influence the accumulation of aliphatic glucosinolates, the defense metabolites that control fitness. The epistatic combinations were used to test if there is more or less epistasis depending on gene membership within the same or different phenotypic subnetworks. Extensive epistasis was observed between the transcription factors, regardless of subnetwork membership. Metabolite accumulation displayed antagonistic epistasis, suggesting the presence of a buffering mechanism. Epistasis affecting enzymatic estimated activity was highly conditional on the tissue and environment and shifted between both antagonistic and synergistic forms. Transcriptional analysis showed that epistasis shifts depend on how the trait is measured. Because the 47 combinations described here represent a small sampling of the potential epistatic combinations in this genetic network, there is potential for significantly more epistasis. Additionally, the main effect of the individual gene was not predictive of the epistatic effects, suggesting that there is a need for further studies.

Plants integrate internal and external signals to finely coordinate growth and defense for maximal fitness within a complex environment. A common model suggests that growth and defense show a trade-offs relationship driven by energy costs. However, recent studies suggest that the coordination of growth and defense likely involves more conditional and intricate connections than implied by the trade-off model. To explore how a transcription factor (TF) network may coordinate growth and defense, we used a high-throughput phenotyping approach to measure growth and flowering in a set of single and pairwise mutants previously linked to the aliphatic glucosinolate (GLS) defense pathway. Supporting a link between growth and defense, 17 of the 20 tested defense-associated TFs significantly influenced plant growth and/or flowering time. The TFs’ effects were conditional upon the environment and age of the plant, and more critically varied across the growth and defense phenotypes for a given genotype. In support of the coordination model of growth and defense, the TF mutant’s effects on short-chain aliphatic GLS and growth did not display a simple correlation. We propose that large TF networks integrate internal and external signals and separately modulate growth and the accumulation of the defensive aliphatic GLS.

Extensive research has been conducted to identiff specific EAA that limit milk production or milk protein yield of dairy cows. Much of this research has concentrated on manipulating the quantities of EAA delivered postruminally for digestion and absorption and subsequent delivery to the mammary gland.Free AA that are presented to the rumen are rapidly deaminated (Chalupa 1975 Les vaches etaient diviseeri r.f"r r" dispositif exp6rimental .n 'blo., aleatoires complets, en I 2 blocs de 3 vaches chacun' presentant un stade de lactation ;"y"t 6 54J: et un re;de;;;iluiii". -oy.n Ae -lf t5l1-t-es traitements compares etaient: 1 ) tourteau de soja (TS),2) tourteau de soja tanne (TST) et 3).;;;'1"6;;-;pioieiqu.ruit ai r"sr' ae farine de

No abstract

Plants integrate internal and external signals to finely coordinate growth and defense allowing for maximal fitness within a complex environment. One common model for the relationship between growth and defense is a trade-off model in which there is a simple negative interaction between growth and defense theoretically driven by energy costs. However, there is a developing consensus that the coordination of growth and defense likely involves a more conditional and intricate connection. To explore how a transcription factor network may coordinate growth and defense, we used high-throughput phenotyping to measure growth and flowering in a set of single and pairwise mutants previously linked to the aliphatic glucosinolate defense pathway. Showing the link between growth and aliphatic glucosinolate defense, 17 of the 20 tested TFs significantly influence plant growth and/or flowering time. These effects were conditional upon the environment, age of the plant and more critically varied amongst the phenotypes when using the same genotype. The phenotypic effects of the TF mutants on SC GLS accumulation and on growth were not correlated, which indicating that there is not a simple energetic trade-off for growth and defense. We propose that large transcription factor networks create a system to integrate internal and external signals and separately modulate growth and defense traits. Significant StatementThe relationship between plant growth and plant defense is critical to understanding plant fitness or yield and is often described as a simple trade-off model. However, this model is under extensive research and is a highly debated research topic. We used a large-scale phenotyping approach to study the dynamics of plant growth in a transcriptional factor (TF) mutant population in the model plant Arabidopsis that regulates the defense pathway, aliphatic glucosinolates (GLS). We showed that these TFs have significant effects on plant growth that is heavily influenced by epistasis and the environment. Critically, the effects of these TFs on growth and defense were largely independent and had little evidence supporting a simple trade off model. Instead, we propose that the TFs independently coordinate plant growth and plant defense. As our study tested a fraction of the total potential TFs influencing growth, our findings indicate that there is high potential to use TFs to promote both plant growth and defense simultaneously for modern agriculture in the ever-changing environment.