No abstract

No abstract

Although alfacalcidol is widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis, its mechanism of action in bone is not fully understood. Alfacalcidol stimulates intestinal calcium (Ca) absorption, increases urinary Ca excretion and serum Ca levels, and suppresses parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion. It remains to be clarified, especially under vitamin D-replete conditions, whether alfacalcidol exerts skeletal effects solely via these Ca-related effects, whether the resultant suppression of PTH is a prerequisite for the skeletal actions of alfacalcidol, and, by inference, whether alfacalcidol has an advantage over vitamin D in the treatment of osteoporosis. To address these issues, we (1) compared the effects of alfacalcidol p.o. (0.025-0.1 microg/kg BW) vis-à-vis vitamin D(3) (50-400 microg/kg BW) on bone loss in 8-month-old, ovariectomized (OVX) rats as a function of their Ca-related effects, and (2) examined whether the skeletal effects of alfacalcidol occur independently of suppression of PTH, using parathyroidectomized (PTX) rats continuously infused with hPTH(1-34). The results indicate that (1) in OVX rats, alfacalcidol increases BMD and bone strength more effectively than vitamin D(3) at given urinary and serum Ca levels: larger doses of vitamin D(3) are required to produce a similar BMD-increasing effect, in the face of hypercalcemia and compromised bone quality; (2) at doses that maintain serum Ca below 10 mg/dl, alfacalcidol suppresses urinary deoxypyridinoline excretion more effectively than vitamin D(3); and (3) alfacalcidol is capable of increasing bone mass in PTX rats with continuous infusion of PTH, and therefore acts independently of PTH levels. It is suggested that alfacalcidol exerts bone-protective effects independently of its Ca-related effects, and is in this respect superior to vitamin D(3), and that the skeletal actions of alfacalcidol take place, at least in part, independently of suppression of PTH. Together, these results provide a rationale for the clinical utility of alfacalcidol and its advantage over vitamin D(3) in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Although alfacalcidol has been widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis in certain countries, its mechanism of action in bone, especially in the vitamin D-replete state, remains unclear. Here we provide histomorphometric as well as biochemical evidence that alfacalcidol suppresses osteoclastic bone resorption in an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis. Furthermore, when compared with 17␤-estradiol, a representative antiresorptive drug, it is evident that alfacalcidol causes a dose-dependent suppression of bone resorption, and yet maintains or even stimulates bone formation, as reflected in increases in serum osteocalcin levels and bone formation rate at both trabecular and cortical sites. 17␤-Estradiol, which suppresses bone resorption to the same extent as alfacalcidol, causes a parallel reduction in the biochemical and histomorphometric markers of bone formation. As a final outcome, treatment with alfacalcidol increases bone mineral density and improves mechanical strength more effectively than 17␤-estradiol, with a more pronounced difference in cortical bone. We conclude that estrogens depress bone turnover primarily by suppressing bone resorption and, as a consequence, bone formation as well, whereas alfacalcidol "supercouples" these processes, in that it suppresses bone resorption while maintaining or stimulating bone formation. (J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:770 -779)

Background Esketamine nasal spray (Spravato) in conjunction with oral antidepressants (ADs) is approved in the European Union, United States, and other markets for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of esketamine nasal spray in Japanese patients with TRD needs to be assessed. Methods This Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled study was conducted in adult Japanese patients with TRD meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fifth edition) criteria of major depressive disorder with nonresponse to ≥ 1 but < 5 different ADs in the current episode at screening. Patients were treated with a new oral AD for 6 weeks (prospective lead-in phase); nonresponders were randomized (2:1:1:1) to placebo or esketamine (28-, 56-, or 84-mg) nasal spray along with the continued use of AD for 4 weeks (DB induction phase). Responders (≥50% reduction from baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score) from the DB induction phase continued into the 24-week posttreatment phase and patients who relapsed could participate in a 4-week open-label (OL) second induction (flexibly-dosed esketamine). The primary efficacy endpoint, change from baseline in the MADRS total score at Day 28 in the DB induction phase, was based on mixed-effects model using repeated measures pairwise comparisons using a Dunnett adjustment. Results Of the 202 patients randomized in the DB induction phase (esketamine [n = 122] or placebo [n = 80]), the MADRS total scores decreased from baseline to Day 28 of the DB induction phase (− 15.2, − 14.5, − 15.1, and − 15.3 for esketamine 28 mg, 56 mg, 84 mg, and placebo groups, respectively), indicating an improvement in depressive symptoms; however, the difference between the esketamine and placebo groups was not statistically significant. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events during the DB induction phase in the combined esketamine group (incidences ranging from 12.3 to 41.0%) were blood pressure increased, dissociation, dizziness, somnolence, nausea, hypoaesthesia, vertigo, and headache; the incidence of each of these events was > 2-fold higher than the corresponding incidence in the placebo group. Conclusions Efficacy of esketamine plus oral AD in Japanese TRD patients was not established; further investigation is warranted. All esketamine doses were safe and tolerated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02918318. Registered: 28 September 2016.

We conducted this study to evaluate the characteristic effects of alfacalcidol (ALF) and menatetrenone (VK) in preventing bone loss using an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis. Bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) or sham operation was performed on 10-month-old female Wistar rats. OVX caused a significant decrease in the bone mass and the mechanical strength of the lumbar vertebra as well as the femur 6 months after surgery. VK treatment (30 mg/kg, food intake) required a 6-month period to prevent the bone loss induced by estrogen deficiency, whereas ALF (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg, p.o.) increased the bone mass and the mechanical strength of the lumbar vertebra as well as the femur in a 3-month treatment period, far above the level in the sham-operated rats. Neither ALF or VK caused hypercalcemia, despite administration for as long as 6 months. By doing a micro-CT analysis of the vertebral trabecular microstructure, it was revealed that ALF treatment increased the interconnections and the plate-like structures and that VK significantly increased the trabecular number. It was also indicated that the increase in spinal strength by ALF treatment was closely associated with improvement of the microstructure, but not VK. The results of histomorphometric analysis showed that ALF caused a significant suppression of bone resorption yet maintained formation in the endocortical perimeter, and also stimulated bone formation in the periosteal perimeter, thereby causing an increase in cortical area. No marked effect of VK on histomorphometric parameters was observed, whereas VK as well as ALF maintained the material strength at femoral midshaft of the normal level, suggesting that VK affected bone quality and thereby prevented the decrease in mechanical strength of femur caused by OVX. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that the two drugs, ALF and VK, differed markedly in their potency and mechanisms for improving bone strength. These results have important implications in understanding the characteristic actions of vitamin K and active vitamin D on bone metabolism.

1-Alpha, 25-dihydroxy vitamin D(3) (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)), an active form of vitamin D(3), plays a critical role in calcium and bone metabolism. Although 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) has been used for osteoporosis therapy, the direct role of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) on human osteoclastogenesis has not been well characterized. Here we show that 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) treatment significantly inhibited human osteoclast formation at the early stage of differentiation in a concentration-dependent manner. 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) inhibited the expression of nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1, also referred as NFAT2), an essential transcription factor for osteoclast differentiation, and upregulated the expression of interferon-beta (IFN-beta), a strong inhibitor of osteoclastogenesis in osteoclast progenitors. Inhibitory effects of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) on osteoclastogenesis and NFATc1 expression were restored by treatment with an antibody against IFN-beta, suggesting that upregulation of IFN-beta by 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) treatment results in inhibition of NFATc1 expression, in turn interfering with osteoclast formation. Thus, our study may provide a molecular basis for the treatment of human bone diseases by 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) through regulation of the IFN-beta and NFATc1 axis.

The bone phenotype of mice overexpressing MIF was studied. These mice showed decreased trabecular bone, increased bone formation rate, and increased MMP-3, -9, and -13 mRNA expression in the femora and tibias. This model provides evidence of the role played by MIF in bone remodeling and balance in vivo.Introduction: The role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in in vivo bone remodeling remains unelucidated. We describe disordered bone metabolism in transgenic mice overexpressing MIF. Materials and Methods: For in vivo study, CT, bone histomorphometry, blood and urine biochemical data, and gene expression of MIF transgenic (MIF Tg) mice and littermate wildtype (WT) mice were examined. For in vitro study, osteoclastogenesis in the co-culture of bone marrow cells and osteoblasts from MIF Tg and WT were assessed. Results: CT analyses revealed a significant reduction in the trabecular bone of distal femur in MIF Tg at 8-12 weeks of age. Histomorphometric analysis revealed increase in several measures of bone formation. Osteoclastogenesis was not influenced by the origin of bone marrow cells or osteoblasts. Urine level of deoxypyridinoline/creatinine and the mRNA levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -3, -9, and -13 in femurs were elevated in MIF Tg. Conclusions: Overexpression of MIF causes high-turnover osteoporosis in mice. The increased expression of MMPs in bone was suggested, at least in part, as one cause of this phenotype, because MMPs plays important roles for bone resorption without affecting the formation of osteoclasts. This model provides evidence of the role played by MIF in bone remodeling and balance.