There are limited data regarding whether albuminuria and reduced estimated GFR (eGFR) are separate and independent risk factors for cardiovascular and renal events among individuals with type 2 diabetes. The Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study examined the effects of routine BP lowering on adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes. We investigated the effects of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and eGFR on the risk for cardiovascular and renal events in 10,640 patients with available data. During an average 4.3-yr follow-up, 938 (8.8%) patients experienced a cardiovascular event and 107 (1.0%) experienced a renal event. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular events was 2.48 (95% confidence interval 1.74 to 3.52) for every 10-fold increase in baseline UACR and 2.20 (95% confidence interval 1.09 to 4.43) for every halving of baseline eGFR, after adjustment for regression dilution. There was no evidence of interaction between the effects of higher UACR and lower eGFR. Patients with both UACR Ͼ300 mg/g and eGFR Ͻ60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 at baseline had a 3.2-fold higher risk for cardiovascular events and a 22.2-fold higher risk for renal events, compared with patients with neither of these risk factors. In conclusion, high albuminuria and low eGFR are independent risk factors for cardiovascular and renal events among patients with type 2 diabetes.

BP is an important determinant of kidney disease among patients with diabetes. The recommended thresholds to initiate treatment to lower BP are 130/80 and 125/75 mmHg for people with diabetes and nephropathy, respectively. We sought to determine the effects of lowering BP below these currently recommended thresholds on renal outcomes among 11,140 patients who had type 2 diabetes and participated in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study. Patients were randomly assigned to fixed combination perindopril-indapamide or placebo, regardless of their BP at entry. During a mean follow-up of 4.3 yr, active treatment reduced the risk for renal events by 21% (P < 0.0001), which was driven by reduced risks for developing microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (both P < 0.003). Effects of active treatment were consistent across subgroups defined by baseline systolic or diastolic BP. Lower systolic BP levels during follow-up, even to <110 mmHg, was associated with progressively lower rates of renal events. In conclusion, BP-lowering treatment with perindopril-indapamide administered routinely to individuals with type 2 diabetes provides important renoprotection, even among those with initial BP <120/70 mmHg. We could not identify a BP threshold below which renal benefit is lost.

2328 -2336 DOI 10.1007 /s00125-009-1484 scores 28-30 ('normal', n=8,689), 24-27 ('mild dysfunction', n=2,231) and <24 ('severe dysfunction', n=212). Risks of major cardiovascular events, death and hypoglycaemia and interactions with treatment were assessed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results Relative to normal function, both mild and severe cognitive dysfunction significantly increased the multipleadjusted risks of major cardiovascular events (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46 and 1.42, 95% CI 1.01-1.99; both p< 0.05), cardiovascular death (1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.71 and 1.56, 95% CI 0.99-2.46; both p≤0.05) and all-cause death (1.33, 95% CI 1.16-1.54 and 1.50, 95% CI 1

Atrial fibrillation is relatively common in type 2 diabetes and is associated with substantially increased risks of death and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. This arrhythmia identifies individuals who are likely to obtain greater absolute benefits from blood pressure-lowering treatment. Atrial fibrillation in diabetic patients should be regarded as a marker of particularly adverse outcome and prompt aggressive management of all risk factors.

Strengths of associations and discrimination statistics suggested that WHR was the best predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type-2 diabetes and BMI the worst.

Background:According to the current schizophrenia treatment guidelines, 3 levels of responsiveness to antipsychotic medication exist: those who respond to first-line antipsychotics, those with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who respond to clozapine, and those with clozapine-resistant or ultra-treatment resistant schizophrenia. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies indicate that antipsychotic medication decreases glutamate or total glutamate + glutamine in the brains of patients with schizophrenia and may represent a biomarker of treatment response; however, the 3 levels of treatment responsiveness have not been evaluated.Methods:Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy spectra were acquired at 3 Tesla from patients taking a second generation non-clozapine antipsychotic (first-line responders), patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia taking clozapine, patients with ultra-treatment resistant schizophrenia taking a combination of antipsychotics, and healthy comparison subjects.Results:Group differences in cerebrospinal fluid-corrected total glutamate + glutamine levels scaled to creatine were detected in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [df(3,48); F = 3.07, P = .04, partial η2 = 0.16] and the putamen [df(3,32); F = 2.93, P = .05, partial η2 = 0.22]. The first-line responder group had higher dorsolateral prefrontal cortex total glutamate + glutamine levels scaled to creatine than those with ultra-treatment resistant schizophrenia [mean difference = 0.25, standard error = 0.09, P = .04, family-wise error-corrected]. Those with treatment-resistant schizophrenia had higher total glutamate + glutamine levels scaled to creatine in the putamen than the first-line responders (mean difference = 0.31, standard error = 0.12, P = .05, family-wise error-corrected) and those with ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia (mean difference = 0.39, standard error = 0.12, P = .02, family-wise error-corrected).Conclusions:Total glutamate + glutamine levels scaled to creatine in the putamen may represent a marker of response to clozapine. Future studies should investigate glutamatergic anomalies prior to clozapine initiation and following successful treatment.

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000952246.

Acetaminophen improved pain and well-being without major side effects in patients with cancer and persistent pain despite a strong opioid regimen. Its addition is worth considering in all such patients.