Speakers use a variety of contextual information, such as facial emotional expressions for the successful transmission of their message. Listeners must decipher the meaning by understanding the intention behind it (Recanati, 1986). A traditional approach to the study of communicative intention has been through speech acts (Escandell, 2006). The objective of the present study is to further the understanding of the influence of facial expression to the recognition of communicative intention. The study sought to: verify the reliability of facial expressions recognition, find if there is an association between a facial expression and a category of speech acts, test if words contain an intentional load independent of the facial expression presented, and test whether facial expressions can modify an utterance’s communicative intention and the neural correlates associated using univariate and multivariate approaches. We found that previous observation of facial expressions associated with emotions can modify the interpretation of an assertive utterance that followed the facial expression. The hemodynamic brain response to an assertive utterance was moderated by the preceding facial expression and that classification based on the emotions expressed by the facial expression could be decoded by fluctuations in the brain’s hemodynamic response during the presentation of the assertive utterance. Neuroimaging data showed activation of regions involved in language, intentionality and face recognition during the utterance’s reading. Our results indicate that facial expression is a relevant contextual cue that decodes the intention of an utterance, and during decoding it engages different brain regions in agreement with the emotion expressed.
Is brain structure related to function? Can one predict the other? These are questions that are still waiting to be answered definitively. In this paper we seek to investigate these questions, in particular, we are interested in the relation between brain structure and theory of mind (ToM). ToM is defined as the ability to attribute mental states to others. Previous studies have observed correlations between performance on ToM tasks, and gray-matter size/volume in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and precuneus (PCu). Despite these findings, there are concerns about false positive results and replicability issues. In this study we used two different tasks to evaluate ToM, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and the Short Story Task (SST). Performance in these tasks was correlated to brain anatomy measures including voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and cortical thickness (CT) analysis, from ninety-one neurotypical participants. High-resolution structural brain images were acquired, and whole-brain and region of interest (ROI) analyses were implemented. The analyses did not show statistically significant associations between ToM performance and brain structural measures after correction. Significant associations between performance on ToM tests and a widespread array of regions loosely associated with ToM were observed only for whole brain uncorrected analysis (p < 0.001). These results do not replicate a previous study with neurotypical participants. We tested two different ToM tests, two different softwares for VBM and CT, and we used two samples, one with 91 and a sub-sample with 69 participants. Neither of these conditions made a difference in the results obtained. Consequently, these results suggest that if the population is neurotypical and homogenous, it is unlikely that a reliable association between brain anatomy measures and ToM performance, as measured with these tasks, may be found.
Is brain structure related to function? Can one predict the other? These are questions that are still waiting to be answered definitively. In this paper we seek to investigate these questions, in particular, we are interested in the relation between brain structure and theory of mind (ToM). ToM is defined as the ability to attribute mental states to others. Previous studies have observed correlations between performance on ToM tasks, and grey-matter size/volume in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and precuneus (PCu). Despite these findings, there are concerns about false positive results and replicability issues. In this study we used two different tasks to evaluate ToM, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and the Short Story Task (SST). Performance in these tasks was correlated to brain anatomy measures including voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and cortical thickness (CT) analysis, from ninety-one neurotypical participants. High-resolution structural brain images were acquired, and whole-brain and region of interest (ROI) analyses were implemented. The analyses did not show statistically significant associations between ToM performance and brain structural measures after correction. Significant associations between performance on ToM tests and a widespread array of regions loosely associated with ToM were observed only for whole brain uncorrected analysis analysis (p < 0.001). These results do not replicate a previous study with neurotypical participants (Sato et al., 2016). We tested two different ToM tests, two different softwares for VBM and CT, and we used two samples, one with 91 and a sub-sample with 69 participants. Neither of these conditions made a difference in the results obtained. Consequently, these results suggest that if the population is neurotypical and homogenous, it is unlikely that a reliable association between brain anatomy measures and ToM performance, as measured with these tasks, may be found.
BackgroundNeuroinflammation may be associated with global vascular dysfunction and damage. APOE‐ε4, a major genetic risk factor for late onset AD, is expressed in neuroinflammatory cells and may lead to increased pro‐inflammatory cytokine and nitric oxide production in response to injury. We examined the relationship of vascular dysfunction and damage with a magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) marker of neuroinflammation in APOE‐ε4 carriers and non‐carriers.MethodSingle proton MRS, pulsed arterial spin labeling (PASL), and T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) were collected in a sample of racially/ethnically diverse, middle‐aged adults (n=313, women=67%, age=55±11, years of education=13±3, 72% Latinx/22% Non‐Latinx Black/6% Non‐Latinx White) and used to derive hippocampal Inositol/creatine ratios (Ins/Cr) as a measure of neuroinflammation. Global cerebral blood flow (CBF) was used as a measure of vascular function, and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume as a measure of small vessel cerebrovascular damage. APOE genotype was categorized as the presence or absence of at least one ε4 alleles. We estimated general linear models to test main effects and the interaction of APOE‐ε4 and Ins/Cr on WMH or CBF, adjusting for age and stratified by race/ethnicity due to differential prevalence and effects of APOE ε4.ResultsIn the whole sample, being an ε4 non‐carrier (β=‐12.0 95%CI: [‐24.8, 0.83], p=0.067) and having greater Ins/Cr (β=‐1.1[‐2.2, 0.1], p=0.062) were associated with lower CBF. Within Non‐Latinx Black participants, being an APOE‐ε4 non‐carrier (β=‐40.2[‐73.3, ‐7.1], p=0.02) and having greater Ins/Cr (β=‐3.7[‐73.3, ‐7.1], p=0.007) were associated with lower CBF. The negative association with Ins/Cr was stronger in APOE‐ε4 carriers compared to non‐carriers (β=3.9[0.65, 7.1], p=0.02). No associations of Ins/Cr were observed with WMH.ConclusionGlobal vascular dysfunction, but not vascular damage, was related to hippocampal inflammation in APOE‐ε4 carriers among Non‐Latinx Black middle‐aged adults. Neuroinflammation may be linked to vascular brain health which is particularly important for groups with higher APOE‐ε4 prevalence or with greater exposure to social determinants of health that can lead to greater inflammation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.