BackgroundParavertebral nerve blocks (PVBs) are frequently used to treat pain during and following breast surgery, but have various undesirable risks such as pneumothorax. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) also provides perioperative breast analgesia, but is purported to be easier to administer with a favorable safety profile. However, it remains unknown if the new ESPB provides comparable analgesia as the decades-old PVB technique.MethodsSubjects undergoing unilateral or bilateral non-mastectomy breast surgery were randomized to a single-injection ESPB or PVB in a subject-blinded fashion (ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine; 20 mL unilateral or 16 mL/side for bilateral). We hypothesized that (1) analgesia would be non-inferior in the recovery room as measured on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with ESPB, and (2) opioid consumption would be non-inferior in the operating and recovery rooms with ESPB.ResultsBoth pain scores and opioid consumption were higher in subjects with ESPBs (n=50) than PVBs (n=50; median NRS 3.0 vs 0; 95% CI −3.0 to 0; p=0.0011; and median morphine equivalents 2.0 vs 1.5 mg; 95% CI −1.2 to −0.1; p=0.0043). No block-related adverse events occurred in either group.ConclusionsPVBs provided superior analgesia and reduced opioid requirements following non-mastectomy breast surgery. To compare the relatively rare complications between the techniques will require a sample size 1–2 orders of magnitude greater than the current investigation; however, without a dramatic improvement in safety profile for ESPBs, it appears that PVBs are superior to ESPBs for postoperative analgesia after non-mastectomy breast surgery.Trial registration numberNCT03549234.
Highlights d Duodenal microbiome diversity decreases and coliforms increase in older subjects d Prevalence of phylum Proteobacteria and anaerobes increase in older subjects d Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, and Escherichia increase with chronological age alone d Klebsiella increases with medication use and Clostridium with number of conditions
The pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) begins years prior to clinical diagnosis. The development of antecedent biomarkers that indicate the presence of AD pathology and predict risk for decline in both cognitively normal and mildly impaired individuals will be useful as effective therapies are developed. While cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers such as amyloid-β (Aβ) 42 and tau are useful, additional biomarkers are needed. To identify new markers, we utilized 2-D difference gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) of individual CSF samples from subjects with very mild AD versus controls after depletion of high-abundant proteins. Protein spots displaying differential abundance between the two groups were identified with MS. A number of candidate biomarkers were identified in 18 gel features. Selected candidates were quantified in a larger clinical set using ELISA. The mean levels of α1-antichymotrypsin (ACT), antithrombin III (ATIII), and zinc-α2-glycoprotein (ZAG) were significantly higher in the mild AD group, and the mean level of carnosinase 1 (CNDP1) was decreased. When these biomarkers are optimally combined, there is a strong trend toward greater specificity and sensitivity based on clinical diagnosis than when used individually. Our findings provide novel biomarker candidates for very mild and mild AD that can be further assessed as antecedent markers and predictors of clinical progression.
Adrenal neoplasms can be resected laparoscopically under ICG fluorescence guidance and can be used to clearly identify vascular structures and enhance the borders of the tumor. This technique allows for clear identification of the adrenal vein and has the potential to improve the safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy.
INTRODUCTION:Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) includes diarrhea-predominant (IBS-D) and constipation-predominant (IBS-C) subtypes. We combined breath testing and stool microbiome sequencing to identify potential microbial drivers of IBS subtypes.METHODS:IBS-C and IBS-D subjects from 2 randomized controlled trials (NCT03763175 and NCT04557215) were included. Baseline breath carbon dioxide, hydrogen (H2), methane (CH4), and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) levels were measured by gas chromatography, and baseline stool microbiome composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Microbial metabolic pathways were analyzed using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes collection databases.RESULTS:IBS-C subjects had higher breath CH4 that correlated with higher gut microbial diversity and higher relative abundance (RA) of stool methanogens, predominantly Methanobrevibacter, as well as higher absolute abundance of Methanobrevibacter smithii in stool. IBS-D subjects had higher breath H2 that correlated with lower microbial diversity and higher breath H2S that correlated with higher RA of H2S-producing bacteria, including Fusobacterium and Desulfovibrio spp. The predominant H2 producers were different in these distinct microtypes, with higher RA of Ruminococcaceae and Christensenellaceae in IBS-C/CH4+ (which correlated with Methanobacteriaceae RA) and higher Enterobacteriaceae RA in IBS-D. Finally, microbial metabolic pathway analysis revealed enrichment of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes modules associated with methanogenesis and biosynthesis of methanogenesis cofactor F420 in IBS-C/CH4+ subjects, whereas modules associated with H2S production, including sulfate reduction pathways, were enriched in IBS-D.DISCUSSION:Our findings identify distinct gut microtypes linked to breath gas patterns in IBS-C and IBS-D subjects, driven by methanogens such as M. smithii and H2S producers such as Fusobacterium and Desulfovibrio spp, respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.