The availabilities of water and nitrogen resources are among the main abiotic factors modifying plant physiology and growth. Consequently, via bottom‐up processes, they also can have an impact on the performance of herbivorous insects. However, the extent to which the modification of plant growth is responsible for such an impact remains unclear. We conducted a factorial experiment quantifying Myzus persicae aphid abundance and the vegetative growth of Prunus persica peach tree shoots under contrasting levels of nitrogen and water supplies. We used a hierarchical analysis of multiple regression models to determine whether the consequences of the availability of nitrogen and water on aphid abundance could be the result of a modification of plant growth. Maximum aphid abundance was achieved under nitrogen and water comfort conditions. The best model explaining variance in aphid abundance took into account vegetative growth and water supply, as well as their interaction. The results of the present study suggest that a higher nitrogen supply increases aphid abundance by fostering plant growth. Additionally, the positive response of aphid abundance to vegetative growth is lower in the case of water restriction because, under such conditions, aphids cannot take full advantage of tree vigour. Such a result provides new insights into aphid control in agriculture, as well as on the possible effects of climate change.

Apple and peach orchards are chemicalintensive systems, and aphids are one of their major pests. Aphids alter fruiting and shoot development, and they can spread viruses. Decades of insecticide use have developed aphid resistance, which calls on research to provide alternatives to chemicals for pest management. Here, we review the literature to identify, for each stage of the aphid life cycle, existing alternatives based on either top-down (i.e. aphid predation or parasitism) or bottom up (i.e. increase of host plant resistance) processes. Firstly, it was found that most studies focus on topdown processes, namely on conservation biological control aiming to preserve existing populations of natural enemies: predators, parasitoids and nematodes. This is achieved by (i) providing shelters (i.e. planting hedges, weed or flower strips) or alternative preys in periods of aphid scarcity or (ii) choosing chemicals with the lowest disruptive effects. Those methods prove more efficient when used early in the season, i.e. before the exponential increase of aphid populations. Fostering the complex of natural enemies is also preferable than just supporting one single enemy. Secondly, other techniques, like (i) releasing biological control agents (entomopathogenic fungi, nematodes) or (ii) using pheromone lures to prevent autumnal sexual reproduction, are currently adapted for their use in orchard conditions. Thirdly, bottom-up regulation has to be devised as a long-term strategy, which could start by choosing a cultivar enabling genetic avoidance or developing genetic resistance. Then, aphid development can be reduced by the control of shoot growth or nitrogen accumulation in response to pruning or moderate water and nutrient inputs. At last, autumnal return of aphids could be disrupted by techniques such as kaolin applications that impair aphid host plant location. It is concluded that these alternative methods have to be adapted to local conditions and combined in long-term strategies in order to decrease the infestation risks throughout the orchard lifespan.

Rosy apple aphid abundance is positively correlated to plant vegetative growth at both the shoot and tree scales. Water restriction has a negative impact on aphid abundance only at the tree scale. HighlightsRosy apple aphid abundance on apple is related to growth at both the shoot and the tree scale This relation is modulated by genotype and water supply At the shoot level the effect of water restriction on aphid abundance depends on genotype At the tree level, water restriction always has a negative impact on aphid abundance

No abstract