No abstract

Objective: The effect of advanced carbohydrate counting (ACC) on metabolic and quality of life (QOL) outcomes is uncertain in children with type 1 diabetes. Our aim was to determine whether ACC would improve HbA1c and QOL scores as compared with standard nutrition in this population. Methods: We randomized 87 patients using pump and rapid-acting analogs in a 1 year randomized multicenter study (age 9.6 ± 3.5 years, diabetes duration 4.6 ± 2.7 years, HbA1c 7.8 ± 0.5% [62 ± 5 mmol/mol]). The ACC group received CC education and the control group received traditional dietary education. HbA1c was measured every 3 months. At 0 and 1 year, general, diabetes-specific, and dietrelated QOL were respectively assessed by the KIDSCREEN and WHO-5 questionnaires, the diabetes-specific module of the DISABKIDS, and the diet restriction items of the DSQOLS. Results: Mean HbA1c was lower in the ACC than the control group at 3 months (P < .05) and tended to be lower at 6 months (P = .10), 9 months (P = .10), but not at 12 months. The mean of individual average HbA1c during the one-year study period (from M3 to M12) was 7.63 ± 0.43 in the ACC vs 7.85 ± 0.47% in the control group (60 ± 5 vs 62 ± 5 mmol/mol)(P < .05). ACC was associated with significantly higher scores at 1 year on the KIDSCREEN children's psychological scale and the KIDSCREEN parents' physical scale, the DISABKIDS children's treatment scale, and the children's and parents' dietary restriction scales of the DSQOLS (indicating better QOL or lower perceived diet restriction). Conclusions: ACC may be associated with small improvements in metabolic control and QOL scores in children.

This randomized control trial investigated glucose control with closed-loop (CL) versus threshold-low-glucose-suspend (TLGS) insulin pump delivery in pre-pubertal children with type 1 diabetes in supervised hotel conditions. The patients [n = 24, age range: 7-12, HbA1c: 7.5 ± 0.5% (58 ± 5 mmol/mol)] and their parents were admitted twice at a 3-week interval. CL control to range or TLGS set at 3.9 mmoL/L were assessed for 48 hour in randomized order. Admissions included three meals and one snack, and physical exercise. Meal boluses followed individual insulin/carb ratios. While overnight (22:00-08:00) per cent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) time below 3.9 mmol/L (primary outcome) was similar, time in ranges 3.9 to 10.0 and 3.9 to 7.8 mmoL/L and mean CGM were all significantly improved with CL (P < 0.001). These results were confirmed over the whole 48 hour. Disconnections between devices and limited accuracy of glucose sensors in the hypoglycaemic range appeared as limiting factors for optimal control. CL mode was well accepted while fear of hypoglycaemia was unchanged. CL did not minimize nocturnal hypoglycaemia exposure but improved time in target range compared to TLGS. Although safe and well-accepted, CL systems would benefit from more integrated devices.

No abstract

STUDY QUESTION Are GnRH tests and serum inhibin B levels sufficiently discriminating to distinguish transient constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) from congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) that affects reproductive health for life? SUMMARY ANSWER Both parameters lack the specificity to discriminate CDGP from CHH. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY GnRH tests and inhibin B levels have been proposed to differentiate CDGP from CHH. However, their diagnostic accuracies have been hampered by the small numbers of CHH included and enrichment of CHH patients with more severe forms. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of GnRH tests and inhibin B measurements in a large cohort of CHH male patients with the whole reproductive spectrum. From 2008 to 2018, 232 males were assessed: 127 with CHH, 74 with CDGP and 31 healthy controls. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The participants were enrolled in two French academic referral centres. The following measurements were taken: testicular volume (TV), serum testosterone, inhibin B, LH and FSH, both at baseline and following the GnRH test. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Among CHH patients, the LH response to the GnRH test was very variable and correlated with TV. Among CDGP patients, the LH peak was also variable and 47% of CHH patients had peak LH levels overlapping with the CDGP group. However, no patients with CDGP had an LH peak below 4.0 IU/l, while 53% CHH patients had LH peak below this threshold. Among CHH patients, inhibin B levels were also variable and correlated with TV and peak LH. Inhibin B was significantly lower in CHH patients than in CDGP patients but 50% of CHH values overlapped with CDGP values. Interestingly, all patients with CDGP had inhibin B levels above 35 pg/ml but 50% of CHH patients also had levels above this threshold. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION As CHH is very rare, an international study would be necessary to recruit a larger CHH cohort and consolidate the conclusion reached here. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Peak LH and basal inhibin B levels are variable in both CHH and CDGP with significant overlap. Both parameters lack specificity and sensitivity to efficiently discriminate CHH from CDGP. This reflects the varying degree of gonadotropin deficiency inherent to CHH. These two diagnostic procedures may misdiagnose partial forms of isolated (non-syndromic) CHH, allowing them to be erroneously considered as CDGP. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by Agence Française de Lutte contre le Dopage: Grant Hypoproteo AFLD-10 (to J.Y.); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR): Grant ANR-09-GENO-017-01 (to J.Y.); European Cooperation in Science and Technology, COST Action BM1105; Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC), French Ministry of Health: PHRC-2009 HYPO-PROTEO (to J.Y.); and Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC) “Variété”, French Ministry of Health, N° P081216/IDRCB 2009-A00892-55 (to P.C.). There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A