Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-associated disease with maternal symptoms but placental origin. Epigenetic inheritance is involved in some populations. By sequence analysis of 17 genes in the 10q22 region with maternal effects, we narrowed the minimal critical region linked with preeclampsia in the Netherlands to 444 kb. All but one gene in this region, which lies within a female-specific recombination hotspot, encode DNA- or RNA-binding proteins. One gene, STOX1 (also called C10orf24), contained five different missense mutations, identical between affected sisters, cosegregating with the preeclamptic phenotype and following matrilineal inheritance. Four STOX1 transcripts are expressed in early placenta, including invasive extravillus trophoblast, generating three different isoforms. All contain a winged helix domain related to the forkhead (FOX) family. The largest STOX1 isoform has exclusive nuclear or cytoplasmic expression, indicating activation and inactivation, respectively, of the PI3K-Akt-FOX pathway. Because all 38 FOX proteins and all 8 STOX1 homologs have either tyrosine or phenylalanine at position 153, the predominant Y153H variation is highly mutagenic by conservation criteria but subject to incomplete penetrance. STOX1 is a candidate for preeclampsia controlling polyploidization of extravillus trophoblast.
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and its potential to test for multiple disorders has received much attention. This study explores attitudes of women and men towards NIPT, and their views on widening the scope of prenatal testing in a country with a low uptake of prenatal screening (The Netherlands). Five focus groups with low-risk pregnant women (n ¼ 28), three focus groups with men (n ¼ 19) and 13 interviews with high-and low-risk pregnant women were conducted. Participants felt that current prenatal screening has great disadvantages such as uncertain results and risk of miscarriage from follow-up diagnostics. Characteristics of NIPT (accurate, safe and early testing) could therefore diminish these disadvantages of prenatal screening and help lower the barrier for participation. This suggests that NIPT might allow couples to decide about prenatal testing based mostly on their will to test or not, rather than largely based on fear of miscarriage risk or the uncertainty of results. The lower barrier for participation was also seen as a downside that could lead to uncritical use or pressure to test. Widening the scope of prenatal testing was seen as beneficial for severe disorders, although it was perceived difficult to determine where to draw the line. Participants argued that there should be a limit to the scope of NIPT, avoiding testing for minor abnormalities. The findings suggest that NIPT could enable more meaningful decision-making for prenatal screening. However, to ensure voluntary participation, especially when testing for multiple disorders, safeguards on the basis of informed decision-making will be of utmost importance. INTRODUCTIONNon-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) allows detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in the foetus by using circulating cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in the plasma of pregnant women. 1 This technique makes it possible to detect foetal trisomies 21, 13 and 18 as early as 9 weeks into the pregnancy, and perhaps even earlier. 2 As the procedure of NIPT consists of only drawing a blood sample, it eliminates the risk of miscarriage associated with invasive diagnostic procedures, that is, chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis. Consequently, NIPT assures both earlier and safer prenatal testing, although diagnostic confirmation of abnormal NIPT results by invasive testing is still required due to the chance of false positive test results. 3 In 2010, Lo et al 4 showed that it is possible to deduce the entire genomic sequence of a foetus through NIPT, implying that NIPT could identify a much wider range of genetic disorders in the future. These major developments in the field of prenatal testing are generating a great amount of debate regarding the potential impact, benefits and drawbacks of NIPT. Greely 5 , for example, provides a summary of the ethical questions that have been raised with regard to the implications of NIPT on the current prenatal screening setting and
Branchio-oculo-facial syndrome (BOFS; OMIM#113620) is a rare autosomal dominant craniofacial disorder with variable expression. Major features include cutaneous and ocular abnormalities, characteristic facies, renal, ectodermal, and temporal bone anomalies. Having determined that mutations involving TFAP2A result in BOFS, we studied a total of 30 families (41 affected individuals); 26/30 (87%) fulfilled our cardinal diagnostic criteria. The original family with the 3.2 Mb deletion including the TFAP2A gene remains the only BOFS family without the typical CL/P and the only family with a deletion. We have identified a hotspot region in the highly conserved exons 4 and 5 of TFAP2A that harbors missense mutations in 27/30 (90%) families. Several of these mutations are recurrent. Mosaicism was detected in one family. To date, genetic heterogeneity has not been observed. Although the cardinal criteria for BOFS have been based on the presence of each of the core defects, an affected family member or thymic remnant, we documented TFAP2A mutations in three (10%) probands in our series without a classic cervical cutaneous defect or ectopic thymus. Temporal bone anomalies were identified in 3/5 patients investigated. The occurrence of CL/P, premature graying, coloboma, heterochromia irides, and ectopic thymus, are evidence for BOFS as a neurocristopathy. Intrafamilial clinical variability can be marked. Although there does not appear to be mutation-specific genotype-phenotype correlations at this time, more patients need to be studied. Clinical testing for TFAP2A mutations is now available and will assist geneticists in confirming the typical cases or excluding the diagnosis in atypical cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.