Background: Previous research has shown that meniscal and articular cartilage lesions increase with time in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–deficient knee. Purpose: To analyze the association between increased time from ACL injury to reconstruction and the presence of intra-articular lesions. Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who sustained an ACL injury and underwent reconstruction from January 1, 2009, to May 14, 2015. Factors analyzed included age, sex, and body mass index, as well as time from injury to surgery, the presence of meniscal tears, and the presence of cartilage lesions. The data were evaluated to quantify the association between time from ACL injury to reconstruction and presence of intra-articular lesions. Results: Overall, 405 patients were included in this study. Regarding time from injury, 27.3% patients were treated at <3 months, 23.6% at 3 to <6 months, 18% at 6 to <12 months, 13.6% at 12 to <24 months, 10.6% at 24 to <60 months, and 6.9% at ≥60 months. When compared with the group treated <3 months from injury, a significant increase in the rate of medial meniscal tears was seen in the groups treated at 6 to <12 months (odds ratio [OR], 2.2), 12 to <24 months (OR, 3.5), 24 to <60 months (OR, 7.0), and ≥60 months (OR, 6.3). A similar trend was seen with medial femoral condyle lesions in the groups treated at 6 to <12 months (OR, 2.5), 12 to <24 months (OR, 2.6), 24 to <60 months (OR, 2.6), and ≥60 months (OR, 6.9). The prevalence of lateral tibial plateau and lateral femoral condyle lesions also significantly increased with increased time between ACL injury and reconstruction, but this association was not seen until 24 to <60 months (ORs, 5.1 and 11.5, respectively). Conclusion: For patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, an interval >6 months between injury and surgery was associated with an increased prevalence of medial meniscal tears and medial compartment chondral lesions at the time of surgery. An interval >24 months between injury and surgery was associated with an increased prevalence of lateral compartment chondral lesions at the time of surgery.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Delays from the time of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear to surgical reconstruction are associated with an increased incidence of meniscal and chondral injuries. Purpose: To evaluate the association between delays in ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and risk factors for intra-articular injuries across 8 patient demographic subsets. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent ACLR from January 2009 to May 2015 at a single institution. Variables collected were age, sex, body mass index, time from injury to surgery, and presence of meniscal tears and chondral injuries. Demographic subsets were created according to sex, age (<27 vs ≥27 years), body mass index (<25 vs ≥25 kg/m2), and injury setting (sports vs non–sports related). Subsets were divided by time from injury to ACLR: 0 to <6 months (control group), 6 to <12 months, and ≥12 months. Multivariate logistic regression–generated odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Results: Overall, 410 patients were included. ORs were significant for an increased incidence of medial meniscal tears (MMTs) (OR, 1.12-3.72; P = .02), medial femoral condyle (MFC) injuries (OR, 1.18-4.81; P = .02), and medial tibial plateau (MTP) injuries (OR, 1.33-31.07; P = .02) with surgical delays of 6 to <12 months. With ≥12-month delays, significance was found for MMTs (OR, 2.92-8.64; P < .001), MFC injuries (OR, 1.86-5.88; P < .001), MTP injuries (OR, 1.37-21.22; P = .02), lateral femoral condyle injuries (OR, 2.41-14.94; P < .001), and lateral tibial plateau injuries (OR, 1.15-5.27; P = .02). In the subset analysis, differences in the timing, location, rate, and pattern of chondral and meniscal injuries became evident. Female patients and patients with non–sports-related ACL tears had less risk of associated injuries with delayed surgery, while other demographic groups showed an increased injury risk. Conclusion: When analyzing patients who were symptomatic enough to eventually require surgery, an increased incidence of MMTs and medial chondral injuries was associated with ≥6-month delays in ACLR, and an increased incidence of lateral chondral injuries was associated with ≥12-month delays. Female patients and patients with non–sports-related ACL tears had less risk of injuries with delayed ACLR.

Background The 36-month Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) or Physiatry residency provides a number of multidisciplinary clinical experiences. These experiences often translate to novel research questions, which may not be pursued by residents due to several factors, including limited research exposure and uncertainty of how to begin a project. Limited resident participation in clinical research negatively affects the growth of Physiatry as a field and medicine as a whole. The two largest Physiatry organizations – the Association of Academic Physiatrists and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation – participate in the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Coalition (DRRC), seeking to improve the state of rehabilitation and disability research through funding opportunities by way of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). A paucity of new Physiatry researchers neutralizes these efforts. Results This paper details the creation of a novel, multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Resident Research program that promotes resident research culture and production. Mirroring our collaborative clinical care paradigm, this program integrates faculty mentorship, institutional research collaborates (Neuroscience Nursing Research Center, Neuroscience Research Development Office) and departmental resources (Shark Tank competition) to provide resident-centric research support. Conclusions The resident-centric rehabilitation research team has formed a successful research program that was piloted from the resident perspective, facilitating academic productivity while respecting the clinical responsibilities of the 36-month PM&R residency. Resident research trainees are uniquely positioned to become future leaders of multidisciplinary and multispecialty collaborative teams, with a focus on patient function and health outcomes.

The aim of this study was to investigate differences in postacute rehabilitation discharge recommendations, actual disposition, and rehabilitation duration by ethnicity at an urban Joint Commission Comprehensive Stroke Center. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult acute stroke hospital admissions between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019 (n = 1717) who were discharged to home with or without outpatient therapy, inpatient rehabilitation facility, or skilled nursing facility (SNF). Lognormal and multinomial regressions were used to create statistical models evaluating ethnicity-related differences in discharge recommendation and disposition as well as rehabilitation duration while controlling for age, stroke type and severity, insurance type, and medical comorbidities; non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients served as the comparison group. Results: Hispanic patients were less likely to have therapy recommendations of SNF, with a trend toward significance ( P = 0.06), yet statistically more likely to have the actual disposition of SNF ( P = 0.01) than NHW patients. There were no statistically significant differences comparing disposition rates for black and Asian patients to NHW patients for both inpatient rehabilitation facility and SNF. There was no statistically significant difference in rehabilitation duration for black or Hispanic patients compared with NHW patients. Conclusions: Hispanic patients were less likely to have therapy recommended SNF disposition, with a trend toward significance, but significantly more likely to have actual SNF disposition compared with NHW patients after acute stroke.

percent underwent horizontal AMZ with an average anteriorization of 10.7mm and medialization of 13.4mm. Ninety-four percent (16/17) were satisfied and would reopt for surgery. Eighty two percent reported being active at last follow-up. Nearly half engaged in moderate to high intensity sports. Thirty-five percent engaged in recreational activities while 18% were minimally active. Four of sixteen reported substantial activity-related pain at last follow-up (all grade III arthrosis at surgery). The average pain score [range 0-10] for the remaining 75% was 2.1 (p<0.001); and the majority of these patients demonstrated grade I-II arthrosis. Post-AMZ symptomatic medial patellar subluxation was corrected successfully in two patients. Fifty-nine percent underwent removal of hardware and 41% required additional procedures. There were no cases of post-op PF instability or conversion to knee arthroplasty. Conclusion: AMZ is effective in ameliorating symptoms and facilitating active lifestyles 15-20 years out in select young patients with lateral or distal PF arthrosis. Ninetyfour percent were satisfied and would choose the procedure again.

Introduction: Several AHA Guidelines recommend inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) care to enhance post-stroke recovery. We evaluated the IRF treatment effect on modified Rankin scale (mRS) score change at 90 days in ischemic stroke (IS) patients. Methods: Using prospectively collected data from Get With the Guidelines-Stroke, the Uniformed Data System for Medical Rehabilitation registry and the electronic medical record, we identified IS patients with discharge disposition of home or IRF between 1/1/2018-12/31/2020. Sociodemographics, clinical variables and IS treatment rates were summarized. IRF outcomes, including length of stay (LOS), improvement in mobility and self-care scores and discharge disposition were compared in thrombectomy vs no thrombectomy groups. mRS at IRF discharge was calculated with a Cronbach interrater score of 0.88; shift analyses of mRS at hospital discharge and 90 days were completed for IS patients in the Home and IRF care groups. Results: Among 738 patients, 499 went home, 239 went to IRF. IRF patients were more likely to have Medicare insurance (49.2 vs 28.9%), undergo thrombectomy (16.3 vs 4.6%) have increased LOS (12.7 vs 4.8 days) and stroke severity (mean NIHSS 7.8 vs 4.8; mean mRS 3.1 vs 1.7) compared to Home (Table 1). At IRF, 39 patients previously underwent thrombectomy, 200 did not. Both groups had a IRF LOS >14 days and considerable recovery in the self-care and mobility domains (Table 2). Shift analysis of mRS at hospital discharge compared to 90 days yielded significant improvements in mRS of 0-2 and lower mortality in the IRF group compared to home group (Figure). Conclusion: In ischemic stroke patients with higher disease severity, IRF treatment is a catalyst for improved functional recovery.