The idea that invasive or nonindigenous species produce a societal cost has become a cultural cliché. Despite the high level of societal concern, the risk assessment process has not been widely used to quantify the risks of invasive species.The study of invasive species has been approached largely on a case-by-case basis, and field studies often have been too idiosyncratic to be used to derive general hypothesis of invasive species establishment (Vermeij 1996). Laboratory and garden studies are hampered by problems of scale, replication, and control (Wardle 2001, Doak et al. 1998. Hypothesized mechanisms for invasive species establishment and spread abound and most may be separated into two general categories: (1) attributes of the nonindigenous species and (2) attributes of the community into which the invasive species has arrived. Studies considering the former are typically searches for lists of common traits among the various species of invasive species, and exceptions to these lists are common (Mack et al. 2000).One of the strongest predictors of plant introductions is if the species has established in another location (Kolar and Lodge 2001). In fish invasions of the Great Lakes, the factors that determined establishment were relatively faster growth, toleration of a wider range of temperature and salinity, and a past history of invasiveness (Kolar and Lodge 2002). Quickly spreading fish have the features of slower relative Environmental Risk and Management from a Landscape Perspective, edited by Kapustka and Landis
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.