No abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, nevirapine (NVP)-associated hepatotoxicity and rash in HIV-infected Thai men and women, including pregnant women, receiving NVP-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). MethodsNVP-containing HAART was prescribed to eligible men and women enrolled in the Prevention of Mother-To-Child Transmission of HIV (PMTCT) and MTCT-Plus programmes. All pregnant women received zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine (3TC)/NVP from 414 weeks of gestational age if their CD4 cell count was 200 cells/mL or from 428 weeks if their CD4 cell count was 4200 cells/mL. Patients followed for at least 8 weeks after starting HAART or until delivery were included in the analyses. ResultsOf 409 patients, 244 were pregnant women, 87 were nonpregnant women and 78 were men. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 15.6% of all patients. Men had a significantly higher rate of asymptomatic hepatotoxicity (P 5 0.021). Pregnant women receiving HAART for PMTCT (92% had CD4 cell counts 4250 cells/mL) had a significantly higher rate of symptomatic hepatotoxicity (P 5 0.0003) than pregnant women receiving HAART for therapy. Rash occurred in 16.1% of all patients. The patients' sex and baseline CD4 cell count were not associated with the risk of hepatotoxicity or rash. NVP was discontinued in 4.2% and 6.8% of patients because of hepatotoxicity and rash, respectively. ConclusionsThe incidence of NVP-related hepatotoxicity and rash in Thai adults is similar to incidences reported for other populations. While larger studies are needed, our data support continued use of NVP-containing regimens as first-line treatment in developing countries for HIV-infected patients, including pregnant women. Pregnant women with high CD4 cell counts may experience higher rates of symptomatic hepatotoxicity and thus require careful clinical and laboratory monitoring.

IntroductionThe number of pediatric COVID-19 infections is increasing; however, the data on long COVID conditions in children is still limited. Our study aimed to find the prevalence of long COVID in children during the Delta and Omicron waves, as well as associated factors.MethodsA single-center prospective cohort study was conducted. We included 802 RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 pediatric patients in the Delta and Omicron periods. Long COVID was defined as having symptoms for ≥3 months after infection. Parents and/or patients were interviewed by phone. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to find associated factors with long COVID.ResultsThe overall prevalence of long COVID was 30.2%. The Delta period had more prevalence than the Omicron (36.3% vs. 23.9%). Common symptoms for patients 0–3 years’ old were loss of appetite, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Conversely, patients 3–18 years’ old had hair loss, dyspnea on exertion, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. However, there was no significant negative impact on daily life. Most symptoms improved after a 6-month follow-up. Factors associated with long COVID-19 conditions were infection during the Omicron period (adjusted OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39–0.74, P < 0.001), fever (adjusted OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.01–2.20, P = 0.04) and rhinorrhea (adjusted OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.06–2.02, P = 0.02).ConclusionInfection during the Omicron wave has a lower prevalence of long COVID. The prognosis is often favorable, and most symptoms gradually become less. However, pediatricians may schedule appointments to surveil long COVID in children with fever or rhinorrhea as an initial symptom.

With better knowledge and availability of antiretroviral treatments, the Thai National HIV Guidelines Working Group has issued treatment guidelines for children in Thailand in March 2010. The most important aspects of these new guidelines are detailed below. ART should be initiated in infants less than 12 months of age at any CD4 level regardless of symptoms and in all children at CDC clinical stage B and C or WHO clinical stages 3 and 4. For children with no or mild symptoms consider CD4-guided thresholds of CD4 <25% (children aged one to five years) or CD4 <350 cells/mm3 (children 5 years or older). The preferred first-line regimen in children aged < 3 years is AZT+3TC+NVP. For children >3 years of age the preferred regimen is AZT+3TC+EFV. If an infant has previously been exposed to NVP perinatally, use AZT+3TC+LPV/r as empirical first regimen. In adolescents, consider TDF+3TC+EFV. The preferred ARV treatment in children who failed first line regimens of 2NRTI+NNRTI (Salvage treatment) comprises 2NRTI (guided by genotype) +LPV/r, and an alternative regimen is 2NRTI (guided by genotype) +ATV/ r (use in cases with dyslipidemia who are six years or older). In cases with extensive NRTI resistance with no effective NRTI option available, double boosted PI with LPV/r+SQV or LPV/r+IDV can be considered. Consultation with an expert is recommended. Laboratory monitoring is recommended for CD4 and every six months. Viral load at least at 6 and 12 months after initiation or change of regimen, then yearly thereafter. More frequent viral load monitoring is advised for cases with unsuccessful virologic response, infants, children with imperfect adherence, or those using of third line regimens. Toxicity monitoring depends on the drug received, at least every six months, and more often as clinically indicated. These include, but are not limited to, complete blood count, renal function tests, liver function tests, urinanalysis, and lipid profiles. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in cases that have ARV-related toxicity, receiving non-standard dosing or regimens, using double boosted PI, and in those with renal or hepatic impairment.

No abstract