Study Design. A retrospective multicenter observational study. Objective. To investigate correction surgeries that were performed in relatively aged patients in terms of mechanical complications (MCs) and their predictive factors. Summary of Background Data. The risk factors associated with MCs have not yet been well examined, especially in aged populations. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 230 surgically treated ASD patients with an average age of 72.2 years. Twenty-eight patients with ASD caused by vertebral fractures were excluded. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Postoperative MCs were defined as proximal junction kyphosis, distal junction kyphosis, pseudoarthrosis, rod breakage, and vertebral fractures. We divided all the ASD patients into two groups: patients with MC (the MC (+) group) and patients without MC (the MC (−) group). Radiographic parameters were evaluated before and immediately after surgery. The SRS-Schwab ASD classification and global alignment and proportion (GAP) score were also evaluated. Results. Of the 202 patients, 91 (45.0%) had MCs. The age at surgery was significantly higher in the MC (+) group than in the MC (−) group. Regarding radiographic parameters, postoperative global tilt (GT), pre- and postoperative thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and postoperative thoracic kyphosis were significantly higher in the MC (+) group than in the MC (−) group. Other parameters, such as the proposed ideal alignment target of PI-LL<10, did not significantly affect MC rates. The GAP score was high in both groups and not significantly related to a higher rate of MC. Forward stepwise logistic regression indicated that the age at surgery, postoperative GT, and preoperative TLK were significant risk factors for MCs. Conclusion. Older age, higher postoperative GT, and higher pre and postoperative TLK can be risk factors for MCs. The GAP score was high in both groups and not significantly related to a higher rate of MC. Level of Evidence: 4

Study Design: Prospective observational single-center study. Objective: To evaluate anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) or posterior surgery (PS) for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) using the modified K-line (mK-line) and to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between these 2 techniques. Summary of Background Data: The authors have previously reported that insufficient posterior decompression is often seen after laminoplasty for CSM in patients with preoperative anterior clearance of the spinal cord <4 mm on the basis of the mK-line. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated the role, if any, of the mK-line in surgical decision making for patients with CSM. Methods: A total of 87 patients were enrolled who underwent surgery for treatment of CSM between 2011 and 2015 at our hospital and who could be followed up for at least 2 years. ADF was selected as a more favorable procedure than PS in patients with anterior spinal clearance of <4 mm on preoperative midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging. On the basis of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy, the rate of recovery of the JOA scores at 2 years after surgery was investigated as a clinical outcome to compare these 2 groups. Results: Mean age was 65.1 (±12.9) years in the ADF group (n=26) and 70.5 (±8.6) years in the PS group (n=61). In the PS group, 10 patients underwent posterior decompression with fusion. Mean preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were 10.5 and 14.1 points in the ADF group and 9.8 and 13.1 points in the PS group, respectively, showing no significant difference in recovery rate of JOA score between the ADF (58.9%) and PS (47.1%) groups. However, patients with a minimum interval between the mK-line and the anterior compression factor on the midsagittal image (minimum interval of the spinal cord) <4 mm tended to have unsatisfactory outcomes (recovery rate 29.6%) compared with patients with minimum interval of the spinal cord >4 mm (53.6%, P=0.07) in the PS group. Conclusion: Preoperative intervention using the mK-line is useful to predict residual cord compression and might homogenize postoperative clinical outcomes in both anterior surgery and PS.

4.

Background: The optimal treatment of osteoporosis after reconstruction surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) remains unclear. In this multicentre retrospective study, we investigated the effects of typically used agents for osteoporosis, namely, bisphosphonates (BP) and teriparatide (TP), on surgical results in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods: Retrospectively registered data were collected from 27 universities and affiliated hospitals in Japan. We compared the effects of BP vs TP on postoperative mechanical complication rates, implant-related reoperation rates, and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent posterior instrumented fusion for OVF. Data were analysed according to whether the osteoporosis was primary or glucocorticoid-induced.

Various studies have found a high incidence of early graft dislodgement after multilevel corpectomy. Although a hybrid fusion technique was developed to resolve implant failure, the hybrid and conventional techniques have not been clearly compared in terms of perioperative complications in patients with severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving three or more levels. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) and anterior hybrid fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL. We therefore retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiologic data of 53 consecutive patients who underwent anterior fusion to treat cervical OPLL: 30 underwent ACCF and 23 underwent anterior hybrid fusion. All patients completed 2 years of follow-ups. Implant migration was defined as subsidence > 3 mm. There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics between the ACCF and hybrid groups. Early implant failure occurred significantly more frequently in the ACCF group (5 cases, 16.7%) compared with the hybrid group (0 cases, 0%). The fusion rate was 80% in the ACCF group and 100% in the hybrid group. Although both procedures can achieve satisfactory neurologic outcomes for multilevel OPLL patients, hybrid fusion likely provides better biomechanical stability than the conventional ACCF technique.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly performed as corrective surgery for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). This paper compares the surgical results of LLIF and conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in ASD using a propensity score matching analysis. We retrospectively reviewed patients with ASD who received LLIF and PLIF/TLIF, and investigated patients’ backgrounds, radiographic parameters, and complications. The propensity scores were calculated from patients’ characteristics, including radiographic parameters and preoperative comorbidities, and one–to-one matching was performed. Propensity score matching produced 21 matched pairs of patients who underwent LLIF and PLIF/TLIF. All radiographic parameters significantly improved in both groups at the final follow-up compared with those of the preoperative period. The comparison between both groups demonstrated no significant difference in terms of postoperative pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis (LL), or pelvic incidence–LL at the final follow-up. However, the sagittal vertical axis tended to be smaller in the LLIF at the final follow-up. Overall, perioperative and late complications were comparable in both procedures. However, LLIF procedures demonstrated significantly less intraoperative blood loss and a smaller incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma compared with PLIF/TLIF procedures in patients with ASD.

No abstract

Background Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a structural abnormality of the thoracic spine that is known to impair posture. However, the relationship between DISH and sagittal balance in the whole spine is unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of DISH in patients with cervical myelopathy caused by cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) or cervical spondylosis and to compare sagittal alignment of the spine between patients with and without DISH. Methods A total of 103 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of cervical myelopathy due to cervical OPLL or spondylosis were retrospectively enrolled in this single-center study. DISH was defined as an ossified lesion that was seen to be completely bridging at least four contiguous adjacent vertebral bodies in the thoracic spine on computed tomography scans. Cervical and spinopelvic sagittal parameters were measured in whole spine radiographs. Results The study population included 28 cases with DISH [DISH (+) group] and 75 without DISH [DISH (−) group]. OPLL was more prevalent in the DISH (+) group than in the DISH (−) group; however, there were no significant differences in other clinical findings. Propensity score matching produced 26 pairs. C7 slope, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C-SVA), whole thoracic kyphotic angles, upper thoracic kyphosis, and T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis values were significant higher in the DISH (+) group than in the DISH (−) group. There was no significant between-group difference in the other sagittal spinopelvic parameters. Conclusions This study is the first to compare sagittal alignment in patients with cervical myelopathy according to whether or not they have DISH. Patients with DISH are more likely to have excessive kyphosis in the thoracic spine, a high C7 slope, and a high C2-7 SVA.