The tumor microenvironment is considered to play a pivotal role in various human malignancies. Neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are considered to have different tumor microenvironments. However, owing to differences in the systemic and/or local immune statuses, tumor microenvironments in different patients may be difficult to compare. Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), although rare, could be useful for exploring the effects of neuroendocrine differentiation on the tumor microenvironment, because both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components are present in the same tumor. Here, we examined 33 cases of histologically confirmed MiNENs and evaluated the influence of neuroendocrine differentiation on the tumor microenvironment by comparing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and other relevant factors in the two components the same tumor. The immunoreactivity of those examined above was evaluated quantitatively. The values of vasohibin-1-positive density (p < 0.0001) and immunoreactivity (p < 0.0001) (representing the neoangiogenesis status) were significantly higher in neuroendocrine as compared to non-neuroendocrine areas of the same tumors. In addition, the Foxp3/CD8 (p = 0.0717) and the PD-1/CD8 ratios (p = 0.0176) (representing tumor immunity suppression) tend to increase in neuroendocrine carcinomas. Immunoreactivity of CD163, a marker of M2-like macrophages, was also higher in the neuroendocrine areas. Our findings indicate that neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors differ from each other with respect to the characteristics of both tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment.
An 87-year-old woman visited her primary-care doctor because of nausea and epigastric pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed a giant bezoar in her stomach. She was referred to our hospital after carbonated beverage dissolution proved ineffective and underwent endoscopic mechanical crushing. After crushing, the symptoms disappeared, and she began eating. Later, however, the crushed fragments reassembled in the duodenal bulb and caused intestinal obstruction. The patient underwent emergency EGD for crushing once more, and all of the fragments were extracted from the body. This case highlights the need for bezoars to be removed from the body after crushing in order to avoid reassembly.
Background The DNA mismatch repair system is one of the defense mechanisms in the body, and the inactivation of mismatch repair plays a pivotal role in secondary carcinogenesis and progression. However, the significance of mismatch repair in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been established. In this study, we explored the diagnostic and prognostic significance of mismatch repair markers, mutL homologue 1 (MLH1), post-meiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2), mutS homologue 2 (MSH2), and mutS homologue 6 (MSH6), in patients with ESCC. Methods We used a notation based on the proportion of immunoreactivity/expression for immunohistochemistry (PRIME notation), which allows the comparison of mismatch repair expression by assigning a score to PRIME notation. MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 were examined immunohistochemically in 189 surgically resected ESCC specimens. Results A total of 100/189 patients with ESCC (53%) received preoperative chemotherapy. The rates of ESCC cases with decreased mismatch repair status were 13.2%, 15.3%, 24.8%, and 12.6% for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6, respectively. The decreased status of individual mismatch repair markers was significantly correlated with worse prognosis in patients with ESCC. Additionally, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were significantly associated with response to preoperative chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that MLH1, PMS2, and MSH2 are independent prognostic factors. Conclusion Our results suggest that mismatch repair is a prognostic biomarker for ESCC and could contribute to the selection of appropriate adjuvant therapy for patients with ESCC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.