SummaryBackgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common infections associated with health care, but its importance as a global health priority is not fully understood. We quantified the burden of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery in countries in all parts of the world.MethodsThis international, prospective, multicentre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection within 2-week time periods at any health-care facility in any country. Countries with participating centres were stratified into high-income, middle-income, and low-income groups according to the UN's Human Development Index (HDI). Data variables from the GlobalSurg 1 study and other studies that have been found to affect the likelihood of SSI were entered into risk adjustment models. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day SSI incidence (defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for superficial and deep incisional SSI). Relationships with explanatory variables were examined using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02662231.FindingsBetween Jan 4, 2016, and July 31, 2016, 13 265 records were submitted for analysis. 12 539 patients from 343 hospitals in 66 countries were included. 7339 (58·5%) patient were from high-HDI countries (193 hospitals in 30 countries), 3918 (31·2%) patients were from middle-HDI countries (82 hospitals in 18 countries), and 1282 (10·2%) patients were from low-HDI countries (68 hospitals in 18 countries). In total, 1538 (12·3%) patients had SSI within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of SSI varied between countries with high (691 [9·4%] of 7339 patients), middle (549 [14·0%] of 3918 patients), and low (298 [23·2%] of 1282) HDI (p<0·001). The highest SSI incidence in each HDI group was after dirty surgery (102 [17·8%] of 574 patients in high-HDI countries; 74 [31·4%] of 236 patients in middle-HDI countries; 72 [39·8%] of 181 patients in low-HDI countries). Following risk factor adjustment, patients in low-HDI countries were at greatest risk of SSI (adjusted odds ratio 1·60, 95% credible interval 1·05–2·37; p=0·030). 132 (21·6%) of 610 patients with an SSI and a microbiology culture result had an infection that was resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic used. Resistant infections were detected in 49 (16·6%) of 295 patients in high-HDI countries, in 37 (19·8%) of 187 patients in middle-HDI countries, and in 46 (35·9%) of 128 patients in low-HDI countries (p<0·001).InterpretationCountries with a low HDI carry a disproportionately greater burden of SSI than countries with a middle or high HDI and might have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. In view of WHO recommendations on SSI prevention that highlight the absence of high-quality interventional research, urgent, pragmatic, randomised trials based in LMICs are needed to assess measures aiming to reduce this preventable complication.FundingDFID-MRC-Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trial Development Grant,...
Citation Systematic ReviewPage 16 ABSTRACTIntroduction: Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is one of the commonest forms of intracranial haemorrhage. Surgical drainage of CSDH is a routine operation in the modern neurosurgical practice which has shown to be the most effective way in treating this entity; however, the incidence of recurrence of the haematoma post operatively remains as high as 26.5%. The risk factors for CSDH recurrence remains an area of ongoing research. Objective: We have conducted a systematic review to evaluate the available literature addressing the risk factors for CSDH recurrence, aiming to minimise or at least identify patients at higher risk of recurrence in order to decrease associated morbidity. Methods: Ovid via Medline, PubMed, and Google scholar databases were searched for eligible studies, search results were then limited to studies in English language, Humans and studies published within the last 5 years. The included studies were critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool, and each study has then been ranked using the Harbour and Miller hierarchy of ranking.Results: Based on available evidence, we classified the risk factors associated with recurrence to patients', radiological, and surgical factors. Patient factors include history of seizures, trauma, alcoholism, brain atrophy, and presence of CSF shunts, while the role of diabetes in relation to the recurrence is controversial. Radiologically the presence of air in the subdural space post-operatively, the width of the haematoma, and the presence of bilateral CSDHs are associated with increased risk of recurrence. While the predictive value of multiple membranes in the CSDH remains controversial. Surgically, the risk of recurrence was noted to be higher in patients with parietal or occipital compared to those who had frontal burr hole drainage, also placing a subdural drain decreases the chance of recurrence and some evidence showed better outcomes for frontally placed drains. The role of anti-inflammatory agents (including steroids) remains an area of ongoing debate. Conclusions: Risk factors for CSDH can be divided into patients', radiological, and surgical factors. We encourage health care providers to minimize if not prevent potentially avoidable factors. Patients with increased risks for recurrence should be identified early by the treating team and when possible should be informed about their higher than usual risk of recurrence. Moreover this review highlights the general lack of a sufficiently powered class I evidence addressing this topic and that further research is required in this topic.
We present an unusual case of steroid responsive inflammatory condition, involving sellar suprasellar region with further ependymal lesions. This is complicated by previous surgery due to pituitary adenoma, not thought to related to inflammatory process. The patient responded well to steroids, but deteriorated due to development of hydrocephalus caused by obstruction due to adhesions. Despite extensive literature review and consideration of all known pathological conditions, it was concluded that the condition represented another inflammatory entity not yet fully characterised. The case also highlights that despite the steroid responsive nature of the condition, the ependymal involvement can result in progressive acute obstructive hydrocephalus with clinical deterioration. This case also suggests close follow-up and early imaging for early detection and treatment of this complication. CASE REPORTThis case report pertains to a 46-year-old male Caucasian who had endoscopic treatment for a pituitary adenona three years previously. He required replacement hydrocortisone and testosterone. Prior to the surgery, he was not known to have any other neurological issues.A year after surgery following minor trauma, he underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan of the head. This confirmed no residual pituitary tumour (Figure 1). He was somewhat non-compliant with endocrine follow-up. Surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging 2 years following initial surgery demonstrated post-up change with some enhancing tissue scaling the pituitary stalk and hypothalamic region; this was not clearly seen on the previous CT scan, possibly due to different modalities and absence of contrast imaging. Two months later, he developed polydipsia, fatigue and a partial left-sided homonymous visual field deficit. There was progressive confusion with fluent dysphasia and inattention. He was pyrexial. Gaze evoked nystagmus was present to the right. The rest of his examination was unremarkable. MRI brain demonstrated significant progression of the abnormalities seen on the earlier scan with increased enhancing tissue involving the pituitary stalk, hypothalamic area and floor of the 3 rd ventricle, also including the optic chiasm (Figure 2). Associated signal
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.